Message ID | 20250307120004.959980-1-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: dts: rockchip: Add pwm nodes for RK3528 | expand |
On Fri, 07 Mar 2025 20:00:02 +0800, Chukun Pan wrote: > Add pwm nodes for RK3528. Most rk3528 boards use pwm-regulator to > supply to CPU, add node to enable them. The PWM core on RK3528 is > the same as RK3328, but the driver doesn't support interrupts yet. > > Unlike other SoCs, pinctrl-names need to be in "active" state, > I'm not sure about this, but otherwise the pwm-regulator will > not work properly. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add pwm nodes for RK3528 commit: 2973d077aedfc114affab96c3b2c7286163cc8c9 Best regards,
Hi Heiko, On 2025-03-12 08:45, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > On Fri, 07 Mar 2025 20:00:02 +0800, Chukun Pan wrote: >> Add pwm nodes for RK3528. Most rk3528 boards use pwm-regulator to >> supply to CPU, add node to enable them. The PWM core on RK3528 is >> the same as RK3328, but the driver doesn't support interrupts yet. >> >> Unlike other SoCs, pinctrl-names need to be in "active" state, >> I'm not sure about this, but otherwise the pwm-regulator will >> not work properly. >> >> [...] > > Applied, thanks! The pinctrl-names should be changed to "default" and not "active", something you can fixup or do you want a patch? In commit 96d8d3253246 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix PWM pinctrl names") similar issue was corrected for current rockchip boards. Regards, Jonas > > [2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add pwm nodes for RK3528 > commit: 2973d077aedfc114affab96c3b2c7286163cc8c9 > > Best regards,
Am Mittwoch, 12. März 2025, 16:00:00 MEZ schrieb Jonas Karlman: > Hi Chukun, > > On 2025-03-12 15:35, Chukun Pan wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> The pinctrl-names should be changed to "default" and not "active", > >> something you can fixup or do you want a patch? so yes of course the pinctrl needs to be default - simply because that's the only pinctrl state mainline supports. But judging by the fact that you're discussing working vs. non-working below, can you please check if we should drop the patch for 6.15 till that is solved? Thanks a lot Heiko > > Sorry I've been a bit busy this week and forgot to send the v2 patch. > > In rk3528.dtsi, the uart and upcoming i2c nodes do not have pinctrl, > > so I prefer to remove them. > > > >>> Unlike other SoCs, pinctrl-names need to be in "active" state, > >>> I'm not sure about this, but otherwise the pwm-regulator will > >>> not work properly. > > > > BTW, setting the pinctrl of pwm corresponding to pwm-regulator > > to "default" will cause kernel boot suspended. > > Sorry but do you know why? > > Not an issue I have seen, do you have any more logs or details? E.g. > what board you use, full regulator node, do you have operating points > defined etc. > > I have runtime tested a branch at [1], that use pinctrl-names = default, > have vdd_arm and vdd_logic defined, also an opp table for cpu and gpu. > > For E20C there is a commit to enable the vdd_logic, however without gpu > enabled and a mali-supply the pwm-regulator is initialized to > max-microvolt by Linux. Have instead updated U-Boot to initialize the > pwm-regulator's: > > ``` > &vdd_arm { > regulator-init-microvolt = <953000>; > }; > > &vdd_logic { > regulator-init-microvolt = <900000>; > }; > ``` > > [1] https://github.com/Kwiboo/linux-rockchip/commits/next-20250311-rk3528/ > > Regards, > Jonas > > > > > e.g. > > ``` > > vdd_arm: regulator-vdd-arm { > > compatible = "pwm-regulator"; > > pwms = <&pwm1 0 5000 1>; > > ... > > }; > > > > &pwm1 { > > pinctrl-0 = <&pwm1m0_pins>; > > pinctrl-names = "default"; > > status = "okay"; > > }; > > ``` > > > > Thanks, > > Chukun > > > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > > >