| Message ID | 20250317155102808MZdMkiovw52X0oY7n47wI@zte.com.cn (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | net: atm: use sysfs_emit_at() instead of scnprintf() | expand |
On 17/03/2025 08:51, tang.dongxing@zte.com.cn wrote: > From: TangDongxing <tang.dongxing@zte.com.cn> > > Follow the advice in Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst: > show() should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting > the value to be returned to user space. > > Signed-off-by: TangDongxing <tang.dongxing@zte.com.cn> Dear ZTE, Can you slow down? You sent a bunch of emails with similar issues which means that dozen of maintainers will deal with the same issues independently. This looks like another vivo or huawei style submission, leading to bugs sneaked via flood of patches. First, fix the name used in the SoB (see submitting patches) to match Latin transcription. Second, use proper SoB chain, see submitting patches. Third, really, really be sure that what you send is correct. You already got quite responses, but you still keep sending patches. Fourth, respond to received feedback instead of flooding us with more of this! Best regards, Krzysztof
>On 17/03/2025 08:51, tang.dongxing@zte.com.cn wrote:> From: TangDongxing <tang.dongxing@zte.com.cn> >> >> Follow the advice in Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst: >> show() should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting >> the value to be returned to user space. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tang Dongxing <tang.dongxing@zte.com.cn>Dear ZTE, > >Can you slow down? You sent a bunch of emails with similar issues which >means that dozen of maintainers will deal with the same issues >independently. This looks like another vivo or huawei style submission, >leading to bugs sneaked via flood of patches. > >First, fix the name used in the SoB (see submitting patches) to match >Latin transcription. > >Second, use proper SoB chain, see submitting patches. > >Third, really, really be sure that what you send is correct. You already >got quite responses, but you still keep sending patches. > >Fourth, respond to received feedback instead of flooding us with more of >this! Dear Krzysztof, Thank you for your feedback. I apologize for my previous submissions. Regarding the issues you've pointed out: I will correct the name used in the SoB to ensure it matches the Latin transcription as required. I will double-check my work before sending any further updates. I appreciate your guidance and will follow the submission guidelines more carefully going forward. If you have any further advice or resources to help me improve my submissions, I would be grateful for your input. Best regards, Tang Dongxing
diff --git a/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c b/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c index 54e7fb1a4ee5..d06ffadc5139 100644 --- a/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c +++ b/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static ssize_t atmaddress_show(struct device *cdev, spin_lock_irqsave(&adev->lock, flags); list_for_each_entry(aaddr, &adev->local, entry) { - count += scnprintf(buf + count, PAGE_SIZE - count, + count += sysfs_emit_at(buf, count, "%1phN.%2phN.%10phN.%6phN.%1phN\n", &aaddr->addr.sas_addr.prv[0], &aaddr->addr.sas_addr.prv[1],