mbox series

[RFC,v2,0/4] Containerised NFS clients and teardown

Message ID cover.1742502819.git.trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Containerised NFS clients and teardown | expand

Message

Trond Myklebust March 20, 2025, 8:40 p.m. UTC
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

When a NFS client is started from inside a container, it is often not
possible to ensure a safe shutdown and flush of the data before the
container orchestrator steps in to tear down the network. Typically,
what can happen is that the orchestrator triggers a lazy umount of the
mounted filesystems, then proceeds to delete virtual network device
links, bridges, NAT configurations, etc.

Once that happens, it may be impossible to reach into the container to
perform any further shutdown actions on the NFS client.

This patchset proposes to allow the client to deal with these situations
by treating the two errors ENETDOWN  and ENETUNREACH as being fatal.
The intention is to then allow the I/O queue to drain, and any remaining
RPC calls to error out, so that the lazy umounts can complete the
shutdown process.

In order to do so, a new mount option "fatal_errors" is introduced,
which can take the values "default", "none" and "enetdown:enetunreach".
The value "none" forces the existing behaviour, whereby hard mounts are
unaffected by the ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH errors.
The value "enetdown:enetunreach" forces ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH errors
to always be fatal.
If the user does not specify the "fatal_errors" option, or uses the
value "default", then ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH will be fatal if the
mount was started from inside a network namespace that is not
"init_net", and otherwise not.

The expectation is that users will normally not need to set this option,
unless they are running inside a container, and want to prevent ENETDOWN
and ENETUNREACH from being fatal by setting "-ofatal_errors=none".

---
v2:
- Fix NFSv4 client cl_flag initialisation
- Add RPC task flag trace decoding

Trond Myklebust (4):
  NFS: Add a mount option to make ENETUNREACH errors fatal
  NFS: Treat ENETUNREACH errors as fatal in containers
  pNFS/flexfiles: Treat ENETUNREACH errors as fatal in containers
  pNFS/flexfiles: Report ENETDOWN as a connection error

 fs/nfs/client.c                        |  5 ++++
 fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c | 24 ++++++++++++++--
 fs/nfs/fs_context.c                    | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/nfs/nfs3client.c                    |  2 ++
 fs/nfs/nfs4client.c                    |  7 +++++
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c                      |  3 ++
 fs/nfs/super.c                         |  2 ++
 include/linux/nfs4.h                   |  1 +
 include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h              |  2 ++
 include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h            |  5 +++-
 include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h           |  1 +
 include/trace/events/sunrpc.h          |  1 +
 net/sunrpc/clnt.c                      | 30 ++++++++++++++------
 13 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

Jeff Layton March 21, 2025, 2:36 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 16:40 -0400, trondmy@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> 
> When a NFS client is started from inside a container, it is often not
> possible to ensure a safe shutdown and flush of the data before the
> container orchestrator steps in to tear down the network. Typically,
> what can happen is that the orchestrator triggers a lazy umount of the
> mounted filesystems, then proceeds to delete virtual network device
> links, bridges, NAT configurations, etc.
> 
> Once that happens, it may be impossible to reach into the container to
> perform any further shutdown actions on the NFS client.
> 
> This patchset proposes to allow the client to deal with these situations
> by treating the two errors ENETDOWN  and ENETUNREACH as being fatal.
> The intention is to then allow the I/O queue to drain, and any remaining
> RPC calls to error out, so that the lazy umounts can complete the
> shutdown process.
> 
> In order to do so, a new mount option "fatal_errors" is introduced,
> which can take the values "default", "none" and "enetdown:enetunreach".
> The value "none" forces the existing behaviour, whereby hard mounts are
> unaffected by the ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH errors.
> The value "enetdown:enetunreach" forces ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH errors
> to always be fatal.
> If the user does not specify the "fatal_errors" option, or uses the
> value "default", then ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH will be fatal if the
> mount was started from inside a network namespace that is not
> "init_net", and otherwise not.
> 
> The expectation is that users will normally not need to set this option,
> unless they are running inside a container, and want to prevent ENETDOWN
> and ENETUNREACH from being fatal by setting "-ofatal_errors=none".
> 
> ---
> v2:
> - Fix NFSv4 client cl_flag initialisation
> - Add RPC task flag trace decoding
> 
> Trond Myklebust (4):
>   NFS: Add a mount option to make ENETUNREACH errors fatal
>   NFS: Treat ENETUNREACH errors as fatal in containers
>   pNFS/flexfiles: Treat ENETUNREACH errors as fatal in containers
>   pNFS/flexfiles: Report ENETDOWN as a connection error
> 
>  fs/nfs/client.c                        |  5 ++++
>  fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c | 24 ++++++++++++++--
>  fs/nfs/fs_context.c                    | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/nfs/nfs3client.c                    |  2 ++
>  fs/nfs/nfs4client.c                    |  7 +++++
>  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c                      |  3 ++
>  fs/nfs/super.c                         |  2 ++
>  include/linux/nfs4.h                   |  1 +
>  include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h              |  2 ++
>  include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h            |  5 +++-
>  include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h           |  1 +
>  include/trace/events/sunrpc.h          |  1 +
>  net/sunrpc/clnt.c                      | 30 ++++++++++++++------
>  13 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 

With the bug in patch #3 fixed, you can add:

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Trond Myklebust March 21, 2025, 3:14 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 10:36 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 16:40 -0400, trondmy@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> > 
> > When a NFS client is started from inside a container, it is often
> > not
> > possible to ensure a safe shutdown and flush of the data before the
> > container orchestrator steps in to tear down the network.
> > Typically,
> > what can happen is that the orchestrator triggers a lazy umount of
> > the
> > mounted filesystems, then proceeds to delete virtual network device
> > links, bridges, NAT configurations, etc.
> > 
> > Once that happens, it may be impossible to reach into the container
> > to
> > perform any further shutdown actions on the NFS client.
> > 
> > This patchset proposes to allow the client to deal with these
> > situations
> > by treating the two errors ENETDOWN  and ENETUNREACH as being
> > fatal.
> > The intention is to then allow the I/O queue to drain, and any
> > remaining
> > RPC calls to error out, so that the lazy umounts can complete the
> > shutdown process.
> > 
> > In order to do so, a new mount option "fatal_errors" is introduced,
> > which can take the values "default", "none" and
> > "enetdown:enetunreach".
> > The value "none" forces the existing behaviour, whereby hard mounts
> > are
> > unaffected by the ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH errors.
> > The value "enetdown:enetunreach" forces ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH
> > errors
> > to always be fatal.
> > If the user does not specify the "fatal_errors" option, or uses the
> > value "default", then ENETDOWN and ENETUNREACH will be fatal if the
> > mount was started from inside a network namespace that is not
> > "init_net", and otherwise not.
> > 
> > The expectation is that users will normally not need to set this
> > option,
> > unless they are running inside a container, and want to prevent
> > ENETDOWN
> > and ENETUNREACH from being fatal by setting "-ofatal_errors=none".
> > 
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Fix NFSv4 client cl_flag initialisation
> > - Add RPC task flag trace decoding
> > 
> > Trond Myklebust (4):
> >   NFS: Add a mount option to make ENETUNREACH errors fatal
> >   NFS: Treat ENETUNREACH errors as fatal in containers
> >   pNFS/flexfiles: Treat ENETUNREACH errors as fatal in containers
> >   pNFS/flexfiles: Report ENETDOWN as a connection error
> > 
> >  fs/nfs/client.c                        |  5 ++++
> >  fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c | 24 ++++++++++++++--
> >  fs/nfs/fs_context.c                    | 38
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  fs/nfs/nfs3client.c                    |  2 ++
> >  fs/nfs/nfs4client.c                    |  7 +++++
> >  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c                      |  3 ++
> >  fs/nfs/super.c                         |  2 ++
> >  include/linux/nfs4.h                   |  1 +
> >  include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h              |  2 ++
> >  include/linux/sunrpc/clnt.h            |  5 +++-
> >  include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h           |  1 +
> >  include/trace/events/sunrpc.h          |  1 +
> >  net/sunrpc/clnt.c                      | 30 ++++++++++++++------
> >  13 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> With the bug in patch #3 fixed, you can add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

Thanks for both the bugfix and the testing! I'll send out a v3.

In addition to the above fix, I want to change the name of the mount
option to be "fatal_neterror", and then capitalise the
ENETDOWN:ENETUNREACH, so that it is more obvious that it refers to the
POSIX errors. At some point, we may want to add support for further
such errors, hence the fussiness.