mbox series

[0/2] drm/i915/dsi: couple of fixing

Message ID cover.1743682608.git.jani.nikula@intel.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series drm/i915/dsi: couple of fixing | expand

Message

Jani Nikula April 3, 2025, 12:21 p.m. UTC
When I was reviewing [1] these oddities caught my eye.

BR,
Jani.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250311100626.533888-1-william.tseng@intel.com

Cc: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>

Jani Nikula (2):
  drm/i915/dsi: separate clock and data lane prepare timing
  drm/i915/dsi: unify naming and simplify checks for dphy params

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 90 ++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

Comments

Tseng, William April 8, 2025, 9:04 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Jani

Both patches look good to me after reviewing and testing the
two patches with the hardware. The MIPI DSI panel is working
with the patches. In the test, both clock and data timing have
no change before and after patch.

Please let me know if you have any questions.


Regards
William

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 8:22 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Tseng, William
> <william.tseng@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/dsi: couple of fixing
> 
> When I was reviewing [1] these oddities caught my eye.
> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250311100626.533888-1-
> william.tseng@intel.com
> 
> Cc: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
> 
> Jani Nikula (2):
>   drm/i915/dsi: separate clock and data lane prepare timing
>   drm/i915/dsi: unify naming and simplify checks for dphy params
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 90 ++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.39.5
Jani Nikula April 9, 2025, 7:54 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 08 Apr 2025, "Tseng, William" <william.tseng@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Jani
>
> Both patches look good to me after reviewing and testing the
> two patches with the hardware. The MIPI DSI panel is working
> with the patches. In the test, both clock and data timing have
> no change before and after patch.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.

If you think we should merge these, please provide your Reviewed-by and
Tested-by, and I will. :)

BR,
Jani.





>
>
> Regards
> William
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 8:22 PM
>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Tseng, William
>> <william.tseng@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/dsi: couple of fixing
>> 
>> When I was reviewing [1] these oddities caught my eye.
>> 
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>> 
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250311100626.533888-1-
>> william.tseng@intel.com
>> 
>> Cc: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
>> 
>> Jani Nikula (2):
>>   drm/i915/dsi: separate clock and data lane prepare timing
>>   drm/i915/dsi: unify naming and simplify checks for dphy params
>> 
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 90 ++++++++------------------
>>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>> 
>> --
>> 2.39.5
>
Tseng, William April 9, 2025, 9:28 a.m. UTC | #3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2025 3:55 PM
> To: Tseng, William <william.tseng@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/dsi: couple of fixing
> 
> On Tue, 08 Apr 2025, "Tseng, William" <william.tseng@intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jani
> >
> > Both patches look good to me after reviewing and testing the two
> > patches with the hardware. The MIPI DSI panel is working with the
> > patches. In the test, both clock and data timing have no change before
> > and after patch.
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> If you think we should merge these, please provide your Reviewed-by and
> Tested-by, and I will. :)
> 
Yes, we should merge these patches for sure.  Here are the tags.

Reviewed-by: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
Tested-by: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>

Thank you for contacting me.


Regards
William



> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > William
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 8:22 PM
> >> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> >> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Tseng, William
> >> <william.tseng@intel.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/dsi: couple of fixing
> >>
> >> When I was reviewing [1] these oddities caught my eye.
> >>
> >> BR,
> >> Jani.
> >>
> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250311100626.533888-1-
> >> william.tseng@intel.com
> >>
> >> Cc: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Jani Nikula (2):
> >>   drm/i915/dsi: separate clock and data lane prepare timing
> >>   drm/i915/dsi: unify naming and simplify checks for dphy params
> >>
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 90
> >> ++++++++------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.39.5
> >
> 
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
Jani Nikula April 9, 2025, 12:01 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, 09 Apr 2025, "Tseng, William" <william.tseng@intel.com> wrote:
> Yes, we should merge these patches for sure.  Here are the tags.
>
> Reviewed-by: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
> Tested-by: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting me.

Thanks a lot, pushed to drm-intel-next.

BR,
Jani.