Message ID | 20250414034626.3491489-2-ziqiaokong@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Fix endless translation loop of riscv | expand |
Hi, On 14/4/25 05:46, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > On big endian systems, pte and updated_pte hold big endian host data > while pte_pa points to little endian target data. This means the branch > at cpu_helper.c:1669 will be always satisfied and restart translation, > causing an endless translation loop. > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Fixes: 0c3e702aca7 ("RISC-V CPU Helpers") > Signed-off-by: Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> > --- > target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > index 6c4391d96b..bc146771c8 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > @@ -1662,9 +1662,9 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env, hwaddr *physical, > target_ulong *pte_pa = qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1); > target_ulong old_pte; > if (riscv_cpu_sxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, cpu_to_le32(pte), cpu_to_le32(updated_pte)); > } else { > - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, cpu_to_le64(pte), cpu_to_le64(updated_pte)); > } > if (old_pte != pte) { > goto restart; If PTEs are always stored in LE order, maybe what we want is earlier: -- >8 -- diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c index 619c76cc001..b6ac2800240 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c @@ -1464,5 +1464,5 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env, hwaddr *physical, if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { - pte = address_space_ldl(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); + pte = address_space_ldl_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); } else { - pte = address_space_ldq(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); + pte = address_space_ldq_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); } ---
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:41 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 14/4/25 05:46, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > > On big endian systems, pte and updated_pte hold big endian host data > > while pte_pa points to little endian target data. This means the branch > > at cpu_helper.c:1669 will be always satisfied and restart translation, > > causing an endless translation loop. > > > > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > Fixes: 0c3e702aca7 ("RISC-V CPU Helpers") > > > Signed-off-by: Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> > > --- > > target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > index 6c4391d96b..bc146771c8 100644 > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > @@ -1662,9 +1662,9 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env, hwaddr *physical, > > target_ulong *pte_pa = qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1); > > target_ulong old_pte; > > if (riscv_cpu_sxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > > - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > > + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, cpu_to_le32(pte), cpu_to_le32(updated_pte)); > > } else { > > - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > > + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, cpu_to_le64(pte), cpu_to_le64(updated_pte)); > > } > > if (old_pte != pte) { > > goto restart; > > If PTEs are always stored in LE order, maybe what we want is earlier: > > -- >8 -- > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > index 619c76cc001..b6ac2800240 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > @@ -1464,5 +1464,5 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState > *env, hwaddr *physical, > if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > - pte = address_space_ldl(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > + pte = address_space_ldl_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > } else { > - pte = address_space_ldq(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > + pte = address_space_ldq_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); Unfortunately, this doesn't work in two ways: 1. Note pte is used in the following code and that means pte must hold a correct value from the view of host endian (in my case, big endian not little endian). 2. address_space_ldq_le will dispatch to ldq_le_p, while address_space_leq will dispatch to ldq_p. However, on little endian targets, ldq_p is an alias of ldq_le_p so making no effects. Per my testing, this patch doesn't have any effect indeed. To have a brief view what is happening, see the logs just before atomic_cmpxchg: pte_pa 0xf14000000000000 == pte 0x140f ? updated_pte 0x144f > } > ---
Hello Philippe, Any further concern regarding this series? I certainly would like to investigate and help =). Bests, Ziqiao On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 7:17 PM Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:41 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 14/4/25 05:46, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > > > On big endian systems, pte and updated_pte hold big endian host data > > > while pte_pa points to little endian target data. This means the branch > > > at cpu_helper.c:1669 will be always satisfied and restart translation, > > > causing an endless translation loop. > > > > > > > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > > Fixes: 0c3e702aca7 ("RISC-V CPU Helpers") > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 4 ++-- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > > index 6c4391d96b..bc146771c8 100644 > > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > > @@ -1662,9 +1662,9 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env, hwaddr *physical, > > > target_ulong *pte_pa = qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1); > > > target_ulong old_pte; > > > if (riscv_cpu_sxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > > > - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > > > + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, cpu_to_le32(pte), cpu_to_le32(updated_pte)); > > > } else { > > > - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > > > + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, cpu_to_le64(pte), cpu_to_le64(updated_pte)); > > > } > > > if (old_pte != pte) { > > > goto restart; > > > > If PTEs are always stored in LE order, maybe what we want is earlier: > > > > -- >8 -- > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > index 619c76cc001..b6ac2800240 100644 > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > @@ -1464,5 +1464,5 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState > > *env, hwaddr *physical, > > if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > > - pte = address_space_ldl(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > > + pte = address_space_ldl_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > > } else { > > - pte = address_space_ldq(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > > + pte = address_space_ldq_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > > Unfortunately, this doesn't work in two ways: > > 1. Note pte is used in the following code and that means pte must hold > a correct value from the > view of host endian (in my case, big endian not little endian). > 2. address_space_ldq_le will dispatch to ldq_le_p, while > address_space_leq will dispatch to ldq_p. > However, on little endian targets, ldq_p is an alias of ldq_le_p so > making no effects. > > Per my testing, this patch doesn't have any effect indeed. To have a > brief view what is happening, > see the logs just before atomic_cmpxchg: > > pte_pa 0xf14000000000000 == pte 0x140f ? updated_pte 0x144f > > > } > > ---
Hi, On 14/4/25 18:59, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > Hello Philippe, > > Any further concern regarding this series? I certainly would like to investigate > and help =). Short term I can't keep looking because I'm busy with other stuffs and tagged this patch for another review, because there is some endianness code smell in get_physical_address(). I understand your change fixes your issue, but I'm skeptical about it, in part because there are no such use in the whole code base. My change suggestion is just a starting point, more is needed. > > Bests, > Ziqiao > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 7:17 PM Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:41 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé >> <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 14/4/25 05:46, Ziqiao Kong wrote: >>>> On big endian systems, pte and updated_pte hold big endian host data >>>> while pte_pa points to little endian target data. This means the branch >>>> at cpu_helper.c:1669 will be always satisfied and restart translation, >>>> causing an endless translation loop. >>>> >>> >>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org >>> Fixes: 0c3e702aca7 ("RISC-V CPU Helpers") >>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 4 ++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c >>>> index 6c4391d96b..bc146771c8 100644 >>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c >>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c >>>> @@ -1662,9 +1662,9 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env, hwaddr *physical, >>>> target_ulong *pte_pa = qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1); >>>> target_ulong old_pte; >>>> if (riscv_cpu_sxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { >>>> - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); >>>> + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, cpu_to_le32(pte), cpu_to_le32(updated_pte)); >>>> } else { >>>> - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); >>>> + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, cpu_to_le64(pte), cpu_to_le64(updated_pte)); >>>> } >>>> if (old_pte != pte) { >>>> goto restart; >>> >>> If PTEs are always stored in LE order, maybe what we want is earlier: >>> >>> -- >8 -- >>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c >>> index 619c76cc001..b6ac2800240 100644 >>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c >>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c >>> @@ -1464,5 +1464,5 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState >>> *env, hwaddr *physical, >>> if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { >>> - pte = address_space_ldl(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); >>> + pte = address_space_ldl_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); >>> } else { >>> - pte = address_space_ldq(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); >>> + pte = address_space_ldq_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); >> >> Unfortunately, this doesn't work in two ways: >> >> 1. Note pte is used in the following code and that means pte must hold >> a correct value from the >> view of host endian (in my case, big endian not little endian). >> 2. address_space_ldq_le will dispatch to ldq_le_p, while >> address_space_leq will dispatch to ldq_p. >> However, on little endian targets, ldq_p is an alias of ldq_le_p so >> making no effects. >> >> Per my testing, this patch doesn't have any effect indeed. To have a >> brief view what is happening, >> see the logs just before atomic_cmpxchg: >> >> pte_pa 0xf14000000000000 == pte 0x140f ? updated_pte 0x144f >> >>> } >>> ---
Accidentally not cc all recipients. Sorry for the confusion. Below is the duplicated message: Hello Philippe, On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 1:38 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 14/4/25 18:59, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > > Hello Philippe, > > > > Any further concern regarding this series? I certainly would like to investigate > > and help =). > > Short term I can't keep looking because I'm busy with other stuffs and > tagged this patch for another review, because there is some endianness > code smell in get_physical_address(). I understand your change fixes > your issue, but I'm skeptical about it, in part because there are no > such use in the whole code base. My change suggestion is just a starting > point, more is needed. Thanks for responding. Actually, the pattern of this usage is actually very common in the code base and that's why I fixed in this way. Sorry I should have put this in the cover letter to justify my fix. Below is an incomplete list of the code using this pattern: - target/i386/tcg/system/excp_helper.c:129 if (likely(in->haddr)) { old = cpu_to_le32(old); new = cpu_to_le32(new); return qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)in->haddr, old, new) == old; } - target/arm/ptw.c: 840 if (ptw->out_be) { old_val = cpu_to_be64(old_val); new_val = cpu_to_be64(new_val); cur_val = qatomic_cmpxchg__nocheck((uint64_t *)host, old_val, new_val); cur_val = be64_to_cpu(cur_val); } else { old_val = cpu_to_le64(old_val); new_val = cpu_to_le64(new_val); cur_val = qatomic_cmpxchg__nocheck((uint64_t *)host, old_val, new_val); cur_val = le64_to_cpu(cur_val); } You might want to do a `grep -rn "qatomic_cmpxchg" .` to see all matches. > > > > > Bests, > > Ziqiao > > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 7:17 PM Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:41 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > >> <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On 14/4/25 05:46, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > >>>> On big endian systems, pte and updated_pte hold big endian host data > >>>> while pte_pa points to little endian target data. This means the branch > >>>> at cpu_helper.c:1669 will be always satisfied and restart translation, > >>>> causing an endless translation loop. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > >>> Fixes: 0c3e702aca7 ("RISC-V CPU Helpers") > >>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> > >>>> --- > >>>> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 4 ++-- > >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > >>>> index 6c4391d96b..bc146771c8 100644 > >>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > >>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > >>>> @@ -1662,9 +1662,9 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env, hwaddr *physical, > >>>> target_ulong *pte_pa = qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1); > >>>> target_ulong old_pte; > >>>> if (riscv_cpu_sxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > >>>> - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > >>>> + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, cpu_to_le32(pte), cpu_to_le32(updated_pte)); > >>>> } else { > >>>> - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > >>>> + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, cpu_to_le64(pte), cpu_to_le64(updated_pte)); > >>>> } > >>>> if (old_pte != pte) { > >>>> goto restart; > >>> > >>> If PTEs are always stored in LE order, maybe what we want is earlier: > >>> > >>> -- >8 -- > >>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > >>> index 619c76cc001..b6ac2800240 100644 > >>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > >>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > >>> @@ -1464,5 +1464,5 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState > >>> *env, hwaddr *physical, > >>> if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > >>> - pte = address_space_ldl(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > >>> + pte = address_space_ldl_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > >>> } else { > >>> - pte = address_space_ldq(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > >>> + pte = address_space_ldq_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > >> > >> Unfortunately, this doesn't work in two ways: > >> > >> 1. Note pte is used in the following code and that means pte must hold > >> a correct value from the > >> view of host endian (in my case, big endian not little endian). > >> 2. address_space_ldq_le will dispatch to ldq_le_p, while > >> address_space_leq will dispatch to ldq_p. > >> However, on little endian targets, ldq_p is an alias of ldq_le_p so > >> making no effects. > >> > >> Per my testing, this patch doesn't have any effect indeed. To have a > >> brief view what is happening, > >> see the logs just before atomic_cmpxchg: > >> > >> pte_pa 0xf14000000000000 == pte 0x140f ? updated_pte 0x144f > >> > >>> } > >>> --- >
On 15/4/25 09:04, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > Accidentally not cc all recipients. Sorry for the confusion. Below is > the duplicated message: > > Hello Philippe, > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 1:38 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 14/4/25 18:59, Ziqiao Kong wrote: >>> Hello Philippe, >>> >>> Any further concern regarding this series? I certainly would like to investigate >>> and help =). >> >> Short term I can't keep looking because I'm busy with other stuffs and >> tagged this patch for another review, because there is some endianness >> code smell in get_physical_address(). I understand your change fixes >> your issue, but I'm skeptical about it, in part because there are no >> such use in the whole code base. My change suggestion is just a starting >> point, more is needed. > > Thanks for responding. > > Actually, the pattern of this usage is actually very common in the code base and > that's why I fixed in this way. Sorry I should have put this in the > cover letter to > justify my fix. Below is an incomplete list of the code using this pattern: > > - target/i386/tcg/system/excp_helper.c:129 > > if (likely(in->haddr)) { > old = cpu_to_le32(old); > new = cpu_to_le32(new); > return qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)in->haddr, old, new) == old; > } > > - target/arm/ptw.c: 840 > > if (ptw->out_be) { > old_val = cpu_to_be64(old_val); > new_val = cpu_to_be64(new_val); > cur_val = qatomic_cmpxchg__nocheck((uint64_t *)host, old_val, new_val); > cur_val = be64_to_cpu(cur_val); > } else { > old_val = cpu_to_le64(old_val); > new_val = cpu_to_le64(new_val); > cur_val = qatomic_cmpxchg__nocheck((uint64_t *)host, old_val, new_val); > cur_val = le64_to_cpu(cur_val); > } Doh OK... > > You might want to do a `grep -rn "qatomic_cmpxchg" .` to see all matches. > > >> >>> >>> Bests, >>> Ziqiao >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 7:17 PM Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:41 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé >>>> <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On 14/4/25 05:46, Ziqiao Kong wrote: >>>>>> On big endian systems, pte and updated_pte hold big endian host data >>>>>> while pte_pa points to little endian target data. This means the branch >>>>>> at cpu_helper.c:1669 will be always satisfied and restart translation, >>>>>> causing an endless translation loop. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org >>>>> Fixes: 0c3e702aca7 ("RISC-V CPU Helpers") >>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 4 ++-- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c >>>>>> index 6c4391d96b..bc146771c8 100644 >>>>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c >>>>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c >>>>>> @@ -1662,9 +1662,9 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env, hwaddr *physical, >>>>>> target_ulong *pte_pa = qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1); >>>>>> target_ulong old_pte; >>>>>> if (riscv_cpu_sxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { >>>>>> - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); >>>>>> + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, cpu_to_le32(pte), cpu_to_le32(updated_pte)); Then don't we need: old_pte = le32_to_cpu(old_pte); >>>>>> } else { >>>>>> - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); >>>>>> + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, cpu_to_le64(pte), cpu_to_le64(updated_pte)); old_pte = le64_to_cpu(old_pte); ? >>>>>> } >>>>>> if (old_pte != pte) { >>>>>> goto restart; >>>>> >>>>> If PTEs are always stored in LE order, maybe what we want is earlier: >>>>> >>>>> -- >8 -- >>>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c >>>>> index 619c76cc001..b6ac2800240 100644 >>>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c >>>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c >>>>> @@ -1464,5 +1464,5 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState >>>>> *env, hwaddr *physical, >>>>> if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { >>>>> - pte = address_space_ldl(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); >>>>> + pte = address_space_ldl_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); >>>>> } else { >>>>> - pte = address_space_ldq(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); >>>>> + pte = address_space_ldq_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); >>>> >>>> Unfortunately, this doesn't work in two ways: >>>> >>>> 1. Note pte is used in the following code and that means pte must hold >>>> a correct value from the >>>> view of host endian (in my case, big endian not little endian). >>>> 2. address_space_ldq_le will dispatch to ldq_le_p, while >>>> address_space_leq will dispatch to ldq_p. >>>> However, on little endian targets, ldq_p is an alias of ldq_le_p so >>>> making no effects. >>>> >>>> Per my testing, this patch doesn't have any effect indeed. To have a >>>> brief view what is happening, >>>> see the logs just before atomic_cmpxchg: >>>> >>>> pte_pa 0xf14000000000000 == pte 0x140f ? updated_pte 0x144f >>>> >>>>> } >>>>> --- >>
Hello Philippe, On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 3:15 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 15/4/25 09:04, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > > Accidentally not cc all recipients. Sorry for the confusion. Below is > > the duplicated message: > > > > Hello Philippe, > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 1:38 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > > <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 14/4/25 18:59, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > >>> Hello Philippe, > >>> > >>> Any further concern regarding this series? I certainly would like to investigate > >>> and help =). > >> > >> Short term I can't keep looking because I'm busy with other stuffs and > >> tagged this patch for another review, because there is some endianness > >> code smell in get_physical_address(). I understand your change fixes > >> your issue, but I'm skeptical about it, in part because there are no > >> such use in the whole code base. My change suggestion is just a starting > >> point, more is needed. > > > > Thanks for responding. > > > > Actually, the pattern of this usage is actually very common in the code base and > > that's why I fixed in this way. Sorry I should have put this in the > > cover letter to > > justify my fix. Below is an incomplete list of the code using this pattern: > > > > - target/i386/tcg/system/excp_helper.c:129 > > > > if (likely(in->haddr)) { > > old = cpu_to_le32(old); > > new = cpu_to_le32(new); > > return qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)in->haddr, old, new) == old; > > } > > > > - target/arm/ptw.c: 840 > > > > if (ptw->out_be) { > > old_val = cpu_to_be64(old_val); > > new_val = cpu_to_be64(new_val); > > cur_val = qatomic_cmpxchg__nocheck((uint64_t *)host, old_val, new_val); > > cur_val = be64_to_cpu(cur_val); > > } else { > > old_val = cpu_to_le64(old_val); > > new_val = cpu_to_le64(new_val); > > cur_val = qatomic_cmpxchg__nocheck((uint64_t *)host, old_val, new_val); > > cur_val = le64_to_cpu(cur_val); > > } > > Doh OK... > > > > > You might want to do a `grep -rn "qatomic_cmpxchg" .` to see all matches. > > > > > >> > >>> > >>> Bests, > >>> Ziqiao > >>> > >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 7:17 PM Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:41 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > >>>> <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> On 14/4/25 05:46, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > >>>>>> On big endian systems, pte and updated_pte hold big endian host data > >>>>>> while pte_pa points to little endian target data. This means the branch > >>>>>> at cpu_helper.c:1669 will be always satisfied and restart translation, > >>>>>> causing an endless translation loop. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > >>>>> Fixes: 0c3e702aca7 ("RISC-V CPU Helpers") > >>>>> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> > >>>>>> --- > >>>>>> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 4 ++-- > >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > >>>>>> index 6c4391d96b..bc146771c8 100644 > >>>>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > >>>>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > >>>>>> @@ -1662,9 +1662,9 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env, hwaddr *physical, > >>>>>> target_ulong *pte_pa = qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1); > >>>>>> target_ulong old_pte; > >>>>>> if (riscv_cpu_sxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > >>>>>> - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > >>>>>> + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, cpu_to_le32(pte), cpu_to_le32(updated_pte)); > > Then don't we need: > > old_pte = le32_to_cpu(old_pte); > > >>>>>> } else { > >>>>>> - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > >>>>>> + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, cpu_to_le64(pte), cpu_to_le64(updated_pte)); > > old_pte = le64_to_cpu(old_pte); > > ? Note old_pte is no longer used later (it is defined within the scope here) and dropped immediately after qatomic_cmpxchg so we don't need that extra bswap. > > >>>>>> } > >>>>>> if (old_pte != pte) { > >>>>>> goto restart; > >>>>> > >>>>> If PTEs are always stored in LE order, maybe what we want is earlier: > >>>>> > >>>>> -- >8 -- > >>>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > >>>>> index 619c76cc001..b6ac2800240 100644 > >>>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > >>>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > >>>>> @@ -1464,5 +1464,5 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState > >>>>> *env, hwaddr *physical, > >>>>> if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > >>>>> - pte = address_space_ldl(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > >>>>> + pte = address_space_ldl_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > >>>>> } else { > >>>>> - pte = address_space_ldq(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > >>>>> + pte = address_space_ldq_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > >>>> > >>>> Unfortunately, this doesn't work in two ways: > >>>> > >>>> 1. Note pte is used in the following code and that means pte must hold > >>>> a correct value from the > >>>> view of host endian (in my case, big endian not little endian). > >>>> 2. address_space_ldq_le will dispatch to ldq_le_p, while > >>>> address_space_leq will dispatch to ldq_p. > >>>> However, on little endian targets, ldq_p is an alias of ldq_le_p so > >>>> making no effects. > >>>> > >>>> Per my testing, this patch doesn't have any effect indeed. To have a > >>>> brief view what is happening, > >>>> see the logs just before atomic_cmpxchg: > >>>> > >>>> pte_pa 0xf14000000000000 == pte 0x140f ? updated_pte 0x144f > >>>> > >>>>> } > >>>>> --- > >> >
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 3:19 PM Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Philippe, > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 3:15 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On 15/4/25 09:04, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > > > Accidentally not cc all recipients. Sorry for the confusion. Below is > > > the duplicated message: > > > > > > Hello Philippe, > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 1:38 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > > > <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> On 14/4/25 18:59, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > > >>> Hello Philippe, > > >>> > > >>> Any further concern regarding this series? I certainly would like to investigate > > >>> and help =). > > >> > > >> Short term I can't keep looking because I'm busy with other stuffs and > > >> tagged this patch for another review, because there is some endianness > > >> code smell in get_physical_address(). I understand your change fixes > > >> your issue, but I'm skeptical about it, in part because there are no > > >> such use in the whole code base. My change suggestion is just a starting > > >> point, more is needed. > > > > > > Thanks for responding. > > > > > > Actually, the pattern of this usage is actually very common in the code base and > > > that's why I fixed in this way. Sorry I should have put this in the > > > cover letter to > > > justify my fix. Below is an incomplete list of the code using this pattern: > > > > > > - target/i386/tcg/system/excp_helper.c:129 > > > > > > if (likely(in->haddr)) { > > > old = cpu_to_le32(old); > > > new = cpu_to_le32(new); > > > return qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)in->haddr, old, new) == old; > > > } > > > > > > - target/arm/ptw.c: 840 > > > > > > if (ptw->out_be) { > > > old_val = cpu_to_be64(old_val); > > > new_val = cpu_to_be64(new_val); > > > cur_val = qatomic_cmpxchg__nocheck((uint64_t *)host, old_val, new_val); > > > cur_val = be64_to_cpu(cur_val); > > > } else { > > > old_val = cpu_to_le64(old_val); > > > new_val = cpu_to_le64(new_val); > > > cur_val = qatomic_cmpxchg__nocheck((uint64_t *)host, old_val, new_val); > > > cur_val = le64_to_cpu(cur_val); > > > } > > > > Doh OK... > > > > > > > > You might want to do a `grep -rn "qatomic_cmpxchg" .` to see all matches. > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Bests, > > >>> Ziqiao > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 7:17 PM Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:41 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > > >>>> <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 14/4/25 05:46, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > > >>>>>> On big endian systems, pte and updated_pte hold big endian host data > > >>>>>> while pte_pa points to little endian target data. This means the branch > > >>>>>> at cpu_helper.c:1669 will be always satisfied and restart translation, > > >>>>>> causing an endless translation loop. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > > >>>>> Fixes: 0c3e702aca7 ("RISC-V CPU Helpers") > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> > > >>>>>> --- > > >>>>>> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 4 ++-- > > >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > >>>>>> index 6c4391d96b..bc146771c8 100644 > > >>>>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > >>>>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > >>>>>> @@ -1662,9 +1662,9 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env, hwaddr *physical, > > >>>>>> target_ulong *pte_pa = qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1); > > >>>>>> target_ulong old_pte; > > >>>>>> if (riscv_cpu_sxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > > >>>>>> - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > > >>>>>> + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, cpu_to_le32(pte), cpu_to_le32(updated_pte)); > > > > Then don't we need: > > > > old_pte = le32_to_cpu(old_pte); > > > > >>>>>> } else { > > >>>>>> - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > > >>>>>> + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, cpu_to_le64(pte), cpu_to_le64(updated_pte)); > > > > old_pte = le64_to_cpu(old_pte); > > > > ? > > Note old_pte is no longer used later (it is defined within the scope here) and > dropped immediately after qatomic_cmpxchg so we don't need that extra bswap. Also pte is not modified inplace previously, unlike the code samples above. > > > > > >>>>>> } > > >>>>>> if (old_pte != pte) { > > >>>>>> goto restart; > > >>>>> > > >>>>> If PTEs are always stored in LE order, maybe what we want is earlier: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- >8 -- > > >>>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > >>>>> index 619c76cc001..b6ac2800240 100644 > > >>>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > >>>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > >>>>> @@ -1464,5 +1464,5 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState > > >>>>> *env, hwaddr *physical, > > >>>>> if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > > >>>>> - pte = address_space_ldl(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > > >>>>> + pte = address_space_ldl_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > > >>>>> } else { > > >>>>> - pte = address_space_ldq(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > > >>>>> + pte = address_space_ldq_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > > >>>> > > >>>> Unfortunately, this doesn't work in two ways: > > >>>> > > >>>> 1. Note pte is used in the following code and that means pte must hold > > >>>> a correct value from the > > >>>> view of host endian (in my case, big endian not little endian). > > >>>> 2. address_space_ldq_le will dispatch to ldq_le_p, while > > >>>> address_space_leq will dispatch to ldq_p. > > >>>> However, on little endian targets, ldq_p is an alias of ldq_le_p so > > >>>> making no effects. > > >>>> > > >>>> Per my testing, this patch doesn't have any effect indeed. To have a > > >>>> brief view what is happening, > > >>>> see the logs just before atomic_cmpxchg: > > >>>> > > >>>> pte_pa 0xf14000000000000 == pte 0x140f ? updated_pte 0x144f > > >>>> > > >>>>> } > > >>>>> --- > > >> > >
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 3:22 PM Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 3:19 PM Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello Philippe, > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 3:15 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > > <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > On 15/4/25 09:04, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > > > > Accidentally not cc all recipients. Sorry for the confusion. Below is > > > > the duplicated message: > > > > > > > > Hello Philippe, > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 1:38 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > > > > <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> On 14/4/25 18:59, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > > > >>> Hello Philippe, > > > >>> > > > >>> Any further concern regarding this series? I certainly would like to investigate > > > >>> and help =). > > > >> > > > >> Short term I can't keep looking because I'm busy with other stuffs and > > > >> tagged this patch for another review, because there is some endianness > > > >> code smell in get_physical_address(). I understand your change fixes > > > >> your issue, but I'm skeptical about it, in part because there are no > > > >> such use in the whole code base. My change suggestion is just a starting > > > >> point, more is needed. > > > > > > > > Thanks for responding. > > > > > > > > Actually, the pattern of this usage is actually very common in the code base and > > > > that's why I fixed in this way. Sorry I should have put this in the > > > > cover letter to > > > > justify my fix. Below is an incomplete list of the code using this pattern: > > > > > > > > - target/i386/tcg/system/excp_helper.c:129 > > > > > > > > if (likely(in->haddr)) { > > > > old = cpu_to_le32(old); > > > > new = cpu_to_le32(new); > > > > return qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)in->haddr, old, new) == old; > > > > } > > > > > > > > - target/arm/ptw.c: 840 > > > > > > > > if (ptw->out_be) { > > > > old_val = cpu_to_be64(old_val); > > > > new_val = cpu_to_be64(new_val); > > > > cur_val = qatomic_cmpxchg__nocheck((uint64_t *)host, old_val, new_val); > > > > cur_val = be64_to_cpu(cur_val); > > > > } else { > > > > old_val = cpu_to_le64(old_val); > > > > new_val = cpu_to_le64(new_val); > > > > cur_val = qatomic_cmpxchg__nocheck((uint64_t *)host, old_val, new_val); > > > > cur_val = le64_to_cpu(cur_val); > > > > } > > > > > > Doh OK... > > > > > > > > > > > You might want to do a `grep -rn "qatomic_cmpxchg" .` to see all matches. > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> Bests, > > > >>> Ziqiao > > > >>> > > > >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 7:17 PM Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:41 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > > > >>>> <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Hi, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On 14/4/25 05:46, Ziqiao Kong wrote: > > > >>>>>> On big endian systems, pte and updated_pte hold big endian host data > > > >>>>>> while pte_pa points to little endian target data. This means the branch > > > >>>>>> at cpu_helper.c:1669 will be always satisfied and restart translation, > > > >>>>>> causing an endless translation loop. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > > > >>>>> Fixes: 0c3e702aca7 ("RISC-V CPU Helpers") > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>> --- > > > >>>>>> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 4 ++-- > > > >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > > >>>>>> index 6c4391d96b..bc146771c8 100644 > > > >>>>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > > >>>>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > > >>>>>> @@ -1662,9 +1662,9 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env, hwaddr *physical, > > > >>>>>> target_ulong *pte_pa = qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1); > > > >>>>>> target_ulong old_pte; > > > >>>>>> if (riscv_cpu_sxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > > > >>>>>> - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > > > >>>>>> + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, cpu_to_le32(pte), cpu_to_le32(updated_pte)); > > > > > > Then don't we need: > > > > > > old_pte = le32_to_cpu(old_pte); > > > > > > >>>>>> } else { > > > >>>>>> - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); > > > >>>>>> + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, cpu_to_le64(pte), cpu_to_le64(updated_pte)); > > > > > > old_pte = le64_to_cpu(old_pte); > > > > > > ? Oh you are correct. I will draft a v3. > > > > Note old_pte is no longer used later (it is defined within the scope here) and > > dropped immediately after qatomic_cmpxchg so we don't need that extra bswap. > > Also pte is not modified inplace previously, unlike the code samples above. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> } > > > >>>>>> if (old_pte != pte) { > > > >>>>>> goto restart; > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> If PTEs are always stored in LE order, maybe what we want is earlier: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- >8 -- > > > >>>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > > >>>>> index 619c76cc001..b6ac2800240 100644 > > > >>>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > > >>>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c > > > >>>>> @@ -1464,5 +1464,5 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState > > > >>>>> *env, hwaddr *physical, > > > >>>>> if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { > > > >>>>> - pte = address_space_ldl(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > > > >>>>> + pte = address_space_ldl_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > > > >>>>> } else { > > > >>>>> - pte = address_space_ldq(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > > > >>>>> + pte = address_space_ldq_le(cs->as, pte_addr, attrs, &res); > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Unfortunately, this doesn't work in two ways: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 1. Note pte is used in the following code and that means pte must hold > > > >>>> a correct value from the > > > >>>> view of host endian (in my case, big endian not little endian). > > > >>>> 2. address_space_ldq_le will dispatch to ldq_le_p, while > > > >>>> address_space_leq will dispatch to ldq_p. > > > >>>> However, on little endian targets, ldq_p is an alias of ldq_le_p so > > > >>>> making no effects. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Per my testing, this patch doesn't have any effect indeed. To have a > > > >>>> brief view what is happening, > > > >>>> see the logs just before atomic_cmpxchg: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> pte_pa 0xf14000000000000 == pte 0x140f ? updated_pte 0x144f > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> } > > > >>>>> --- > > > >> > > >
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c index 6c4391d96b..bc146771c8 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c @@ -1662,9 +1662,9 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env, hwaddr *physical, target_ulong *pte_pa = qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1); target_ulong old_pte; if (riscv_cpu_sxl(env) == MXL_RV32) { - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg((uint32_t *)pte_pa, cpu_to_le32(pte), cpu_to_le32(updated_pte)); } else { - old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, pte, updated_pte); + old_pte = qatomic_cmpxchg(pte_pa, cpu_to_le64(pte), cpu_to_le64(updated_pte)); } if (old_pte != pte) { goto restart;
On big endian systems, pte and updated_pte hold big endian host data while pte_pa points to little endian target data. This means the branch at cpu_helper.c:1669 will be always satisfied and restart translation, causing an endless translation loop. Signed-off-by: Ziqiao Kong <ziqiaokong@gmail.com> --- target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)