Message ID | 20120802150209.GA26601@localhost (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
On 03/08/12 03:02, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:06:41AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:10 PM, James Bottomley >> <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: >>>> Here is the line in sock.i: >>>> >>>> struct static_key memalloc_socks = ((struct static_key) { .enabled = >>>> ((atomic_t) { (0) }) }); >>> >>> The above line contains two compound literals. It also uses a designated >>> initializer to initialize the field enabled. A compound literal is not a >>> constant expression. >> >> Seeing the same thing on ia64 building next-20120726. Same fix works >> for me ... so I'll steal this whole changelog and attributes. > > I got the same error for alpha, the same fix applies. Just trying this patch on Alpha against v3.6-rc1 and it leads to new compilation errors, namely: init/init_task.c:12: error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function init/init_task.c:13: error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function init/init_task.c:16: error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function init/init_task.c:16: error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function make[1]: *** [init/init_task.o] Error 1 > --- > From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> > Subject: [PATCH] [ALPHA] Redefine ATOMIC_INIT and ATOMIC64_INIT to drop the casts > > The following build error occurred during an alpha build: > > net/core/sock.c:274:36: error: initializer element is not constant > > Dave Anglin says: >> Here is the line in sock.i: >> >> struct static_key memalloc_socks = ((struct static_key) { .enabled = >> ((atomic_t) { (0) }) }); > > The above line contains two compound literals. It also uses a designated > initializer to initialize the field enabled. A compound literal is not a > constant expression. > > The location of the above statement isn't fully clear, but if a compound > literal occurs outside the body of a function, the initializer list must > consist of constant expressions. > > Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> > --- > arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > --- linux.orig/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h 2012-05-24 19:03:06.000000000 +0800 > +++ linux/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h 2012-08-02 23:01:02.243224220 +0800 > @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ > */ > > > -#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) ( (atomic_t) { (i) } ) > -#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) ( (atomic64_t) { (i) } ) > +#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) ( { (i) } ) > +#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) ( { (i) } ) > > #define atomic_read(v) (*(volatile int *)&(v)->counter) > #define atomic64_read(v) (*(volatile long *)&(v)->counter) Cheers Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 01:33:09PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote: > On 03/08/12 03:02, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:06:41AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:10 PM, James Bottomley > >> <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: > >>>> Here is the line in sock.i: > >>>> > >>>> struct static_key memalloc_socks = ((struct static_key) { .enabled = > >>>> ((atomic_t) { (0) }) }); > >>> > >>> The above line contains two compound literals. It also uses a designated > >>> initializer to initialize the field enabled. A compound literal is not a > >>> constant expression. > >> > >> Seeing the same thing on ia64 building next-20120726. Same fix works > >> for me ... so I'll steal this whole changelog and attributes. > > > > I got the same error for alpha, the same fix applies. > > Just trying this patch on Alpha against v3.6-rc1 and it leads to new > compilation errors, namely: > > init/init_task.c:12: error: braced-group within expression allowed only > inside a function > init/init_task.c:13: error: braced-group within expression allowed only > inside a function > init/init_task.c:16: error: braced-group within expression allowed only > inside a function > init/init_task.c:16: error: braced-group within expression allowed only > inside a function > make[1]: *** [init/init_task.o] Error 1 Sorry! This will actually compile: -#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) ( { (i) } ) +#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) } Ditto for the 64bit version. I'll send the updated patch. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 12/08/12 14:10, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 01:33:09PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote: >> On 03/08/12 03:02, Fengguang Wu wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:06:41AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:10 PM, James Bottomley >>>> <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: >>>>>> Here is the line in sock.i: >>>>>> >>>>>> struct static_key memalloc_socks = ((struct static_key) { .enabled = >>>>>> ((atomic_t) { (0) }) }); >>>>> >>>>> The above line contains two compound literals. It also uses a designated >>>>> initializer to initialize the field enabled. A compound literal is not a >>>>> constant expression. >>>> >>>> Seeing the same thing on ia64 building next-20120726. Same fix works >>>> for me ... so I'll steal this whole changelog and attributes. >>> >>> I got the same error for alpha, the same fix applies. >> >> Just trying this patch on Alpha against v3.6-rc1 and it leads to new >> compilation errors, namely: >> >> init/init_task.c:12: error: braced-group within expression allowed only >> inside a function >> init/init_task.c:13: error: braced-group within expression allowed only >> inside a function >> init/init_task.c:16: error: braced-group within expression allowed only >> inside a function >> init/init_task.c:16: error: braced-group within expression allowed only >> inside a function >> make[1]: *** [init/init_task.o] Error 1 > > Sorry! This will actually compile: > > -#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) ( { (i) } ) > +#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) } Thanks, it now compiles correctly. I'm currently collecting Alpha patches to send on to Linus so will include this one. Cheers Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--- linux.orig/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h 2012-05-24 19:03:06.000000000 +0800 +++ linux/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h 2012-08-02 23:01:02.243224220 +0800 @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ */ -#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) ( (atomic_t) { (i) } ) -#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) ( (atomic64_t) { (i) } ) +#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) ( { (i) } ) +#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) ( { (i) } ) #define atomic_read(v) (*(volatile int *)&(v)->counter) #define atomic64_read(v) (*(volatile long *)&(v)->counter)