| Message ID | 1344941092-31312-1-git-send-email-tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Adding Max to CC. On 14.8.2012 12:44, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Architecture was set explicitly in debian/control for one of the three > packages (linux-libc-dev) but not for the other two. When cross-building > it gives me an error: > > dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not > appear in package's architecture list (amd64) > > Also note that if used, dpkg --print-architecture should have been > replaced with dpkg-architecture. > > Signed-off-by: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com> > --- > scripts/package/builddeb | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb > index acb8650..d9c71a6 100644 > --- a/scripts/package/builddeb > +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb > @@ -252,13 +252,12 @@ mkdir -p "$destdir" > (cd $objtree; tar -c -f - -T "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles") | (cd $destdir; tar -xf -) > ln -sf "/usr/src/linux-headers-$version" "$kernel_headers_dir/lib/modules/$version/build" > rm -f "$objtree/debian/hdrsrcfiles" "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles" > -arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) > > cat <<EOF >> debian/control > > Package: $kernel_headers_packagename > Provides: linux-headers, linux-headers-2.6 > -Architecture: $arch > +Architecture: any > Description: Linux kernel headers for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch > This package provides kernel header files for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch > . As the package contains files from arch/$SRCARCH/include, I doubt that this is a valid change. Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi, Thanks for your reply, On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:50:10PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > Adding Max to CC. > > On 14.8.2012 12:44, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > Architecture was set explicitly in debian/control for one of the three > > packages (linux-libc-dev) but not for the other two. When cross-building > > it gives me an error: > > > > dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not > > appear in package's architecture list (amd64) > > > > Also note that if used, dpkg --print-architecture should have been > > replaced with dpkg-architecture. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com> > > --- > > scripts/package/builddeb | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb > > index acb8650..d9c71a6 100644 > > --- a/scripts/package/builddeb > > +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb > > @@ -252,13 +252,12 @@ mkdir -p "$destdir" > > (cd $objtree; tar -c -f - -T "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles") | (cd $destdir; tar -xf -) > > ln -sf "/usr/src/linux-headers-$version" "$kernel_headers_dir/lib/modules/$version/build" > > rm -f "$objtree/debian/hdrsrcfiles" "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles" > > -arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) > > > > cat <<EOF >> debian/control > > > > Package: $kernel_headers_packagename > > Provides: linux-headers, linux-headers-2.6 > > -Architecture: $arch > > +Architecture: any > > Description: Linux kernel headers for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch > > This package provides kernel header files for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch > > . > > As the package contains files from arch/$SRCARCH/include, I doubt that > this is a valid change. But you optionally force the Architecture later on in build_package. "Arhcitecture: any" in the source package states that the binary package will be the one stated by the build system.
On 5.9.2012 15:05, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your reply, > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:50:10PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: >> Adding Max to CC. >> >> On 14.8.2012 12:44, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >>> Architecture was set explicitly in debian/control for one of the three >>> packages (linux-libc-dev) but not for the other two. When cross-building >>> it gives me an error: >>> >>> dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not >>> appear in package's architecture list (amd64) >>> >>> Also note that if used, dpkg --print-architecture should have been >>> replaced with dpkg-architecture. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com> >>> --- >>> scripts/package/builddeb | 3 +-- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb >>> index acb8650..d9c71a6 100644 >>> --- a/scripts/package/builddeb >>> +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb >>> @@ -252,13 +252,12 @@ mkdir -p "$destdir" >>> (cd $objtree; tar -c -f - -T "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles") | (cd $destdir; tar -xf -) >>> ln -sf "/usr/src/linux-headers-$version" "$kernel_headers_dir/lib/modules/$version/build" >>> rm -f "$objtree/debian/hdrsrcfiles" "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles" >>> -arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) >>> >>> cat <<EOF >> debian/control >>> >>> Package: $kernel_headers_packagename >>> Provides: linux-headers, linux-headers-2.6 >>> -Architecture: $arch >>> +Architecture: any >>> Description: Linux kernel headers for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch >>> This package provides kernel header files for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch >>> . >> >> As the package contains files from arch/$SRCARCH/include, I doubt that >> this is a valid change. > > But you optionally force the Architecture later on in build_package. > "Arhcitecture: any" in the source package states that the binary package > will be the one stated by the build system. Ah, OK. I don't know much about Debian packaging in fact. Max, could you have a look? The original thread is here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/14/133. I meant to add you to CC before, but apparently I forgot. Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, Michal Marek wrote: > On 5.9.2012 15:05, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for your reply, > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:50:10PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > >> Adding Max to CC. > >> > >> On 14.8.2012 12:44, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > >>> Architecture was set explicitly in debian/control for one of the three > >>> packages (linux-libc-dev) but not for the other two. When cross-building > >>> it gives me an error: > >>> > >>> dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not > >>> appear in package's architecture list (amd64) > >>> > >>> Also note that if used, dpkg --print-architecture should have been > >>> replaced with dpkg-architecture. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com> > >>> --- > >>> scripts/package/builddeb | 3 +-- > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb > >>> index acb8650..d9c71a6 100644 > >>> --- a/scripts/package/builddeb > >>> +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb > >>> @@ -252,13 +252,12 @@ mkdir -p "$destdir" > >>> (cd $objtree; tar -c -f - -T "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles") | (cd $destdir; tar -xf -) > >>> ln -sf "/usr/src/linux-headers-$version" "$kernel_headers_dir/lib/modules/$version/build" > >>> rm -f "$objtree/debian/hdrsrcfiles" "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles" > >>> -arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) > >>> > >>> cat <<EOF >> debian/control > >>> > >>> Package: $kernel_headers_packagename > >>> Provides: linux-headers, linux-headers-2.6 > >>> -Architecture: $arch > >>> +Architecture: any > >>> Description: Linux kernel headers for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch > >>> This package provides kernel header files for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch > >>> . > >> > >> As the package contains files from arch/$SRCARCH/include, I doubt that > >> this is a valid change. > > > > But you optionally force the Architecture later on in build_package. > > "Arhcitecture: any" in the source package states that the binary package > > will be the one stated by the build system. > > Ah, OK. I don't know much about Debian packaging in fact. Max, could you > have a look? The original thread is here: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/14/133. I meant to add you to CC before, > but apparently I forgot. yes indeed it is an invalid change. Cross building shouldn't need it, what did you exactly try?
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:14:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, Michal Marek wrote: > > > On 5.9.2012 15:05, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Thanks for your reply, > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:50:10PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > > >> Adding Max to CC. > > >> > > >> On 14.8.2012 12:44, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > >>> Architecture was set explicitly in debian/control for one of the three > > >>> packages (linux-libc-dev) but not for the other two. When cross-building > > >>> it gives me an error: > > >>> > > >>> dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not > > >>> appear in package's architecture list (amd64) > > >>> > > >>> Also note that if used, dpkg --print-architecture should have been > > >>> replaced with dpkg-architecture. > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com> > > >>> --- > > >>> scripts/package/builddeb | 3 +-- > > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > >>> > > >>> diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb > > >>> index acb8650..d9c71a6 100644 > > >>> --- a/scripts/package/builddeb > > >>> +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb > > >>> @@ -252,13 +252,12 @@ mkdir -p "$destdir" > > >>> (cd $objtree; tar -c -f - -T "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles") | (cd $destdir; tar -xf -) > > >>> ln -sf "/usr/src/linux-headers-$version" "$kernel_headers_dir/lib/modules/$version/build" > > >>> rm -f "$objtree/debian/hdrsrcfiles" "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles" > > >>> -arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) > > >>> > > >>> cat <<EOF >> debian/control > > >>> > > >>> Package: $kernel_headers_packagename > > >>> Provides: linux-headers, linux-headers-2.6 > > >>> -Architecture: $arch > > >>> +Architecture: any > > >>> Description: Linux kernel headers for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch > > >>> This package provides kernel header files for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch > > >>> . > > >> > > >> As the package contains files from arch/$SRCARCH/include, I doubt that > > >> this is a valid change. > > > > > > But you optionally force the Architecture later on in build_package. > > > "Arhcitecture: any" in the source package states that the binary package > > > will be the one stated by the build system. > > > > Ah, OK. I don't know much about Debian packaging in fact. Max, could you > > have a look? The original thread is here: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/14/133. I meant to add you to CC before, > > but apparently I forgot. > > yes indeed it is an invalid change. > Cross building shouldn't need it, what did you exactly try? $ grep CROSS_COMPILE .config CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE="arm-linux-gnueabihf-" Command: KBUILD_DEBARCH=armhf make ARCH=arm KBUILD_IMAGE=uImage deb-pkg Error I get: dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not appear in package's architecture list (amd64) It seems I have to use KBUILD_DEBARCH, as the kernel build system can't really tell if I want armel or armhf (If I built the same kernel for a Squeeze system I would have been forced to use armel). After I apply the patch, I can build the packages with no problem. The generated linux-libc-dev file has "Architecture: armhf". Below is debian/control at the time the error message was generated: Source: linux-upstream Section: kernel Priority: optional Maintainer: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir@debian.org> Standards-Version: 3.8.4 Homepage: http://www.kernel.org/ Package: linux-image-3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+ Provides: linux-image, linux-image-2.6, linux-modules-3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+ Suggests: linux-firmware-image Architecture: any Description: Linux kernel, version 3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+ This package contains the Linux kernel, modules and corresponding other files, version: 3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+. Package: linux-headers-3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+ Provides: linux-headers, linux-headers-2.6 Architecture: amd64 Description: Linux kernel headers for 3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+ on amd64 This package provides kernel header files for 3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+ on amd64 . This is useful for people who need to build external modules Package: linux-libc-dev Section: devel Provides: linux-kernel-headers Architecture: any Description: Linux support headers for userspace development This package provides userspaces headers from the Linux kernel. These headers are used by the installed headers for GNU glibc and other system libraries.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:40:09PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:14:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, Michal Marek wrote: > > > > > On 5.9.2012 15:05, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Thanks for your reply, > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:50:10PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > > > >> Adding Max to CC. > > > >> > > > >> On 14.8.2012 12:44, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > >>> Architecture was set explicitly in debian/control for one of the three > > > >>> packages (linux-libc-dev) but not for the other two. When cross-building > > > >>> it gives me an error: > > > >>> > > > >>> dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not > > > >>> appear in package's architecture list (amd64) > > > >>> > > > >>> Also note that if used, dpkg --print-architecture should have been > > > >>> replaced with dpkg-architecture. > > > >>> > > > >>> Signed-off-by: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com> > > > >>> --- > > > >>> scripts/package/builddeb | 3 +-- > > > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > >>> > > > >>> diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb > > > >>> index acb8650..d9c71a6 100644 > > > >>> --- a/scripts/package/builddeb > > > >>> +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb > > > >>> @@ -252,13 +252,12 @@ mkdir -p "$destdir" > > > >>> (cd $objtree; tar -c -f - -T "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles") | (cd $destdir; tar -xf -) > > > >>> ln -sf "/usr/src/linux-headers-$version" "$kernel_headers_dir/lib/modules/$version/build" > > > >>> rm -f "$objtree/debian/hdrsrcfiles" "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles" > > > >>> -arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) > > > >>> > > > >>> cat <<EOF >> debian/control > > > >>> > > > >>> Package: $kernel_headers_packagename > > > >>> Provides: linux-headers, linux-headers-2.6 > > > >>> -Architecture: $arch > > > >>> +Architecture: any > > > >>> Description: Linux kernel headers for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch > > > >>> This package provides kernel header files for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch > > > >>> . > > > >> > > > >> As the package contains files from arch/$SRCARCH/include, I doubt that > > > >> this is a valid change. > > > > > > > > But you optionally force the Architecture later on in build_package. > > > > "Arhcitecture: any" in the source package states that the binary package > > > > will be the one stated by the build system. > > > > > > Ah, OK. I don't know much about Debian packaging in fact. Max, could you > > > have a look? The original thread is here: > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/14/133. I meant to add you to CC before, > > > but apparently I forgot. > > > > yes indeed it is an invalid change. > > Cross building shouldn't need it, what did you exactly try? > > $ grep CROSS_COMPILE .config > CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE="arm-linux-gnueabihf-" > > Command: > > KBUILD_DEBARCH=armhf make ARCH=arm KBUILD_IMAGE=uImage deb-pkg > > Error I get: > > dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not > appear in package's architecture list (amd64) > > It seems I have to use KBUILD_DEBARCH, as the kernel build system can't > really tell if I want armel or armhf (If I built the same kernel for a > Squeeze system I would have been forced to use armel). well, obviously the dpkg call in -arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) is wrong please fix that. thanks.
diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb index acb8650..d9c71a6 100644 --- a/scripts/package/builddeb +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb @@ -252,13 +252,12 @@ mkdir -p "$destdir" (cd $objtree; tar -c -f - -T "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles") | (cd $destdir; tar -xf -) ln -sf "/usr/src/linux-headers-$version" "$kernel_headers_dir/lib/modules/$version/build" rm -f "$objtree/debian/hdrsrcfiles" "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles" -arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) cat <<EOF >> debian/control Package: $kernel_headers_packagename Provides: linux-headers, linux-headers-2.6 -Architecture: $arch +Architecture: any Description: Linux kernel headers for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch This package provides kernel header files for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch .
Architecture was set explicitly in debian/control for one of the three packages (linux-libc-dev) but not for the other two. When cross-building it gives me an error: dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not appear in package's architecture list (amd64) Also note that if used, dpkg --print-architecture should have been replaced with dpkg-architecture. Signed-off-by: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com> --- scripts/package/builddeb | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)