Message ID | alpine.DEB.2.00.1210260124360.11251@utopia.booyaka.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
* Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [121025 18:28]: > Hi Tony > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Let's make omap_device local to mach-omap2 for > > ARM common zImage support. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> > > This one breaks a 5912-only build: > > arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c: In function 'omap1_pm_runtime_init': > arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c:69:2: error: implicit declaration of function > 'cpu_class_is_omap1' > make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.o] Error 1 > > Fixed by the usual change; it's below. Thanks. I've ran randonfigs on the omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-headers, but have not seen these. Can you do a branch on top of omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-headers with all these fixes that I can pull in? Regards, Tony > arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c > index 16bf2f9..3f2d396 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c > @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ > #include <linux/clk.h> > #include <linux/err.h> > > +#include "soc.h" > + > #ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME > static int omap1_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > { > -- > 1.7.10.4 >
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Can you do a branch on top of omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-headers > with all these fixes that I can pull in? Yes, will do that today. - Paul
* Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [121026 10:03]: > On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Can you do a branch on top of omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-headers > > with all these fixes that I can pull in? > > Yes, will do that today. OK thanks! Tony
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [121026 10:03]: > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > Can you do a branch on top of omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-headers > > > with all these fixes that I can pull in? > > > > Yes, will do that today. > > OK thanks! Just sent the pull request. Are you planning to rebuild cleanup-prcm also when you pull those cleanup-headers fixes in? Am planning to send another PRCM cleanup pull request next week... - Paul
* Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [121026 13:20]: > On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [121026 10:03]: > > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > > Can you do a branch on top of omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-headers > > > > with all these fixes that I can pull in? > > > > > > Yes, will do that today. > > > > OK thanks! > > Just sent the pull request. Are you planning to rebuild cleanup-prcm also > when you pull those cleanup-headers fixes in? Am planning to send another > PRCM cleanup pull request next week... I've merged omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-headers into omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-prcm too now, so you should be able to use commit 7fc54fd3 as the base for further PRCM changes. Regards, Tony
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > I've merged omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-headers into omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-prcm > too now, so you should be able to use commit 7fc54fd3 as the base for > further PRCM changes. OK thanks, will do. - Paul
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c index 16bf2f9..3f2d396 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ #include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/err.h> +#include "soc.h" + #ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME static int omap1_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) {