| Message ID | 1348667971-30876-1-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote: > Sorry for bothering. It appears that this patch should go through ACPI > tree because code changed are under drivers/acpi. > > A set of power resources may be shared by multiple devices. When all > devices share one set of power resources is put into D3_COLD state, > the power resources will be turned off. When one of the device is > waked, the power resource will be turned on and all devices share it > will be powered on to D0uninitialized state. These devices should be > resumed, so that they can get opportunity to go to low power state > later. > > Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> I had applied this to my for-linus branch, headed for v3.7, but had to drop it because it introduced these warnings: drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c: In function 'acpi_pci_unbind': drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c:48:2: warning: passing argument 1 of 'acpi_power_resource_unregister_device' from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:346:6: note: expected 'struct device *' but argument is of type 'struct pci_dev *' drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c: In function 'acpi_pci_bind': drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c:75:2: warning: passing argument 1 of 'acpi_power_resource_register_device' from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:345:5: note: expected 'struct device *' but argument is of type 'struct pci_dev *' Apparently this wasn't tested :-( > --- > drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_unbind(struct acpi_d > > device_set_run_wake(&dev->dev, false); > pci_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(device); > + acpi_power_resource_unregister_device(dev, device->handle); > > if (!dev->subordinate) > goto out; > @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_bind(struct acpi_dev > return 0; > > pci_acpi_add_pm_notifier(device, dev); > + acpi_power_resource_register_device(dev, device->handle); > if (device->wakeup.flags.run_wake) > device_set_run_wake(&dev->dev, true); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 17:02 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote: > > Sorry for bothering. It appears that this patch should go through ACPI > > tree because code changed are under drivers/acpi. > > > > A set of power resources may be shared by multiple devices. When all > > devices share one set of power resources is put into D3_COLD state, > > the power resources will be turned off. When one of the device is > > waked, the power resource will be turned on and all devices share it > > will be powered on to D0uninitialized state. These devices should be > > resumed, so that they can get opportunity to go to low power state > > later. > > > > Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > I had applied this to my for-linus branch, headed for v3.7, but had to > drop it because it introduced these warnings: > > drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c: In function 'acpi_pci_unbind': > drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c:48:2: warning: passing argument 1 of > 'acpi_power_resource_unregister_device' from incompatible pointer type > [enabled by default] > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:346:6: note: expected 'struct device *' but > argument is of type 'struct pci_dev *' > drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c: In function 'acpi_pci_bind': > drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c:75:2: warning: passing argument 1 of > 'acpi_power_resource_register_device' from incompatible pointer type > [enabled by default] > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h:345:5: note: expected 'struct device *' but > argument is of type 'struct pci_dev *' > > Apparently this wasn't tested :-( It's my fault. I apologize for that. It appear that I turn a RFC to PATCH without testing. Will be more careful for next time. Best Regards, Huang Ying > > --- > > drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c > > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_unbind(struct acpi_d > > > > device_set_run_wake(&dev->dev, false); > > pci_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(device); > > + acpi_power_resource_unregister_device(dev, device->handle); > > > > if (!dev->subordinate) > > goto out; > > @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_bind(struct acpi_dev > > return 0; > > > > pci_acpi_add_pm_notifier(device, dev); > > + acpi_power_resource_register_device(dev, device->handle); > > if (device->wakeup.flags.run_wake) > > device_set_run_wake(&dev->dev, true); > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_bind.c @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_unbind(struct acpi_d device_set_run_wake(&dev->dev, false); pci_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(device); + acpi_power_resource_unregister_device(dev, device->handle); if (!dev->subordinate) goto out; @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_bind(struct acpi_dev return 0; pci_acpi_add_pm_notifier(device, dev); + acpi_power_resource_register_device(dev, device->handle); if (device->wakeup.flags.run_wake) device_set_run_wake(&dev->dev, true);