| Message ID | 20121110154231.2836.24377.stgit@chazy-air (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 03:42:31PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote: > Decoding the implementor and part number of the CPU id in the CPU ID > register is needed by KVM, so we factor it out to share the code. > > Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <c.dall@virtualopensystems.com> [...] > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h > index cb47d28..306fb2c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h > @@ -51,6 +51,22 @@ extern unsigned int processor_id; > #define read_cpuid_ext(reg) 0 > #endif > > +#define IMPLEMENTOR_ARM 0x41 > +#define IMPLEMENTOR_INTEL 0x69 > + > +#define PART_NUMBER_ARM1136 0xB360 > +#define PART_NUMBER_ARM1156 0xB560 > +#define PART_NUMBER_ARM1176 0xB760 > +#define PART_NUMBER_ARM11MPCORE 0xB020 > +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A8 0xC080 > +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A9 0xC090 > +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A5 0xC050 > +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A15 0xC0F0 > +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A7 0xC070 > + > +#define PART_NUMBER_XSCALE1 0x1 > +#define PART_NUMBER_XSCALE2 0x2 We should probably prefix these with ARM_CPU_ and make the current names shorter to compensate. e.g. ARM_CPU_PART_1136, ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM ? > /* > * The CPU ID never changes at run time, so we might as well tell the > * compiler that it's constant. Use this function to read the CPU ID > @@ -61,6 +77,16 @@ static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_id(void) > return read_cpuid(CPUID_ID); > } > > +static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_implementor(void) > +{ > + return (read_cpuid_id() & 0xFF000000) >> 24; > +} > + > +static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_part_number(void) > +{ > + return (read_cpuid_id() & 0xFFF0); > +} Perhaps this should take the implementor as an argument, given that the part number is described differently between implementors. The xscale stuff can then move in here (we'll need to check the xscale docs in case perf is using a subfield -- I can't remember off-hand). > static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_cachetype(void) > { > return read_cpuid(CPUID_CACHETYPE); > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c > index 8d7d8d4..ff18566 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c > @@ -200,46 +200,46 @@ static struct arm_pmu *__devinit probe_current_pmu(void) > struct arm_pmu *pmu = NULL; > int cpu = get_cpu(); > unsigned long cpuid = read_cpuid_id(); > - unsigned long implementor = (cpuid & 0xFF000000) >> 24; > - unsigned long part_number = (cpuid & 0xFFF0); > + unsigned long implementor = read_cpuid_implementor(); > + unsigned long part_number = read_cpuid_part_number(); > > pr_info("probing PMU on CPU %d\n", cpu); > > /* ARM Ltd CPUs. */ > - if (0x41 == implementor) { > + if (implementor == IMPLEMENTOR_ARM) { > switch (part_number) { > - case 0xB360: /* ARM1136 */ > - case 0xB560: /* ARM1156 */ > - case 0xB760: /* ARM1176 */ > + case PART_NUMBER_ARM1136: > + case PART_NUMBER_ARM1156: > + case PART_NUMBER_ARM1176: > pmu = armv6pmu_init(); > break; > - case 0xB020: /* ARM11mpcore */ > + case PART_NUMBER_ARM11MPCORE: > pmu = armv6mpcore_pmu_init(); > break; > - case 0xC080: /* Cortex-A8 */ > + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A8: > pmu = armv7_a8_pmu_init(); > break; > - case 0xC090: /* Cortex-A9 */ > + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A9: > pmu = armv7_a9_pmu_init(); > break; > - case 0xC050: /* Cortex-A5 */ > + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A5: > pmu = armv7_a5_pmu_init(); > break; > - case 0xC0F0: /* Cortex-A15 */ > + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A15: > pmu = armv7_a15_pmu_init(); > break; > - case 0xC070: /* Cortex-A7 */ > + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A7: > pmu = armv7_a7_pmu_init(); > break; > } > /* Intel CPUs [xscale]. */ > - } else if (0x69 == implementor) { > + } else if (implementor == IMPLEMENTOR_INTEL) { > part_number = (cpuid >> 13) & 0x7; > switch (part_number) { > - case 1: > + case PART_NUMBER_XSCALE1: > pmu = xscale1pmu_init(); > break; > - case 2: > + case PART_NUMBER_XSCALE2: > pmu = xscale2pmu_init(); > break; > } If you stick this one in a separate patch, I can take it via the perf tree (along with the CPUID rework above). Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 03:42:31PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> Decoding the implementor and part number of the CPU id in the CPU ID >> register is needed by KVM, so we factor it out to share the code. >> >> Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <c.dall@virtualopensystems.com> > > [...] > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h >> index cb47d28..306fb2c 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h >> @@ -51,6 +51,22 @@ extern unsigned int processor_id; >> #define read_cpuid_ext(reg) 0 >> #endif >> >> +#define IMPLEMENTOR_ARM 0x41 >> +#define IMPLEMENTOR_INTEL 0x69 >> + >> +#define PART_NUMBER_ARM1136 0xB360 >> +#define PART_NUMBER_ARM1156 0xB560 >> +#define PART_NUMBER_ARM1176 0xB760 >> +#define PART_NUMBER_ARM11MPCORE 0xB020 >> +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A8 0xC080 >> +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A9 0xC090 >> +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A5 0xC050 >> +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A15 0xC0F0 >> +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A7 0xC070 >> + >> +#define PART_NUMBER_XSCALE1 0x1 >> +#define PART_NUMBER_XSCALE2 0x2 > > We should probably prefix these with ARM_CPU_ and make the current names > shorter to compensate. e.g. ARM_CPU_PART_1136, ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM ? > >> /* >> * The CPU ID never changes at run time, so we might as well tell the >> * compiler that it's constant. Use this function to read the CPU ID >> @@ -61,6 +77,16 @@ static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_id(void) >> return read_cpuid(CPUID_ID); >> } >> >> +static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_implementor(void) >> +{ >> + return (read_cpuid_id() & 0xFF000000) >> 24; >> +} >> + >> +static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_part_number(void) >> +{ >> + return (read_cpuid_id() & 0xFFF0); >> +} > > Perhaps this should take the implementor as an argument, given that the > part number is described differently between implementors. The xscale > stuff can then move in here (we'll need to check the xscale docs in case > perf is using a subfield -- I can't remember off-hand). > >> static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_cachetype(void) >> { >> return read_cpuid(CPUID_CACHETYPE); >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c >> index 8d7d8d4..ff18566 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c >> @@ -200,46 +200,46 @@ static struct arm_pmu *__devinit probe_current_pmu(void) >> struct arm_pmu *pmu = NULL; >> int cpu = get_cpu(); >> unsigned long cpuid = read_cpuid_id(); >> - unsigned long implementor = (cpuid & 0xFF000000) >> 24; >> - unsigned long part_number = (cpuid & 0xFFF0); >> + unsigned long implementor = read_cpuid_implementor(); >> + unsigned long part_number = read_cpuid_part_number(); >> >> pr_info("probing PMU on CPU %d\n", cpu); >> >> /* ARM Ltd CPUs. */ >> - if (0x41 == implementor) { >> + if (implementor == IMPLEMENTOR_ARM) { >> switch (part_number) { >> - case 0xB360: /* ARM1136 */ >> - case 0xB560: /* ARM1156 */ >> - case 0xB760: /* ARM1176 */ >> + case PART_NUMBER_ARM1136: >> + case PART_NUMBER_ARM1156: >> + case PART_NUMBER_ARM1176: >> pmu = armv6pmu_init(); >> break; >> - case 0xB020: /* ARM11mpcore */ >> + case PART_NUMBER_ARM11MPCORE: >> pmu = armv6mpcore_pmu_init(); >> break; >> - case 0xC080: /* Cortex-A8 */ >> + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A8: >> pmu = armv7_a8_pmu_init(); >> break; >> - case 0xC090: /* Cortex-A9 */ >> + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A9: >> pmu = armv7_a9_pmu_init(); >> break; >> - case 0xC050: /* Cortex-A5 */ >> + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A5: >> pmu = armv7_a5_pmu_init(); >> break; >> - case 0xC0F0: /* Cortex-A15 */ >> + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A15: >> pmu = armv7_a15_pmu_init(); >> break; >> - case 0xC070: /* Cortex-A7 */ >> + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A7: >> pmu = armv7_a7_pmu_init(); >> break; >> } >> /* Intel CPUs [xscale]. */ >> - } else if (0x69 == implementor) { >> + } else if (implementor == IMPLEMENTOR_INTEL) { >> part_number = (cpuid >> 13) & 0x7; >> switch (part_number) { >> - case 1: >> + case PART_NUMBER_XSCALE1: >> pmu = xscale1pmu_init(); >> break; >> - case 2: >> + case PART_NUMBER_XSCALE2: >> pmu = xscale2pmu_init(); >> break; >> } > > If you stick this one in a separate patch, I can take it via the perf > tree (along with the CPUID rework above). > thanks, I sent a separate patch. -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:38:46PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 03:42:31PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote: > >> Decoding the implementor and part number of the CPU id in the CPU ID > >> register is needed by KVM, so we factor it out to share the code. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <c.dall@virtualopensystems.com> [...] > >> +static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_implementor(void) > >> +{ > >> + return (read_cpuid_id() & 0xFF000000) >> 24; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_part_number(void) > >> +{ > >> + return (read_cpuid_id() & 0xFFF0); > >> +} > > > > Perhaps this should take the implementor as an argument, given that the > > part number is described differently between implementors. The xscale > > stuff can then move in here (we'll need to check the xscale docs in case > > perf is using a subfield -- I can't remember off-hand). [...] > > If you stick this one in a separate patch, I can take it via the perf > > tree (along with the CPUID rework above). > > > thanks, > I sent a separate patch. Looks like we still have the ugly xscale cpuid parsing inline. Could you move it as I suggested, please? Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:38:46PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote: >> > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 03:42:31PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> >> Decoding the implementor and part number of the CPU id in the CPU ID >> >> register is needed by KVM, so we factor it out to share the code. >> >> >> >> Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <c.dall@virtualopensystems.com> > > [...] > >> >> +static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_implementor(void) >> >> +{ >> >> + return (read_cpuid_id() & 0xFF000000) >> 24; >> >> +} >> >> + >> >> +static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_part_number(void) >> >> +{ >> >> + return (read_cpuid_id() & 0xFFF0); >> >> +} >> > >> > Perhaps this should take the implementor as an argument, given that the >> > part number is described differently between implementors. The xscale >> > stuff can then move in here (we'll need to check the xscale docs in case >> > perf is using a subfield -- I can't remember off-hand). > > [...] > >> > If you stick this one in a separate patch, I can take it via the perf >> > tree (along with the CPUID rework above). >> > >> thanks, >> I sent a separate patch. > > Looks like we still have the ugly xscale cpuid parsing inline. Could you > move it as I suggested, please? > yes, sorry I missed that one. I went hunting through some old Xscale docs, but cannot find anything that specifies more details about the part number (or "product number" as intel calls it), so I preserved the existing bit parsing. -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h index cb47d28..306fb2c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h @@ -51,6 +51,22 @@ extern unsigned int processor_id; #define read_cpuid_ext(reg) 0 #endif +#define IMPLEMENTOR_ARM 0x41 +#define IMPLEMENTOR_INTEL 0x69 + +#define PART_NUMBER_ARM1136 0xB360 +#define PART_NUMBER_ARM1156 0xB560 +#define PART_NUMBER_ARM1176 0xB760 +#define PART_NUMBER_ARM11MPCORE 0xB020 +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A8 0xC080 +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A9 0xC090 +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A5 0xC050 +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A15 0xC0F0 +#define PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A7 0xC070 + +#define PART_NUMBER_XSCALE1 0x1 +#define PART_NUMBER_XSCALE2 0x2 + /* * The CPU ID never changes at run time, so we might as well tell the * compiler that it's constant. Use this function to read the CPU ID @@ -61,6 +77,16 @@ static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_id(void) return read_cpuid(CPUID_ID); } +static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_implementor(void) +{ + return (read_cpuid_id() & 0xFF000000) >> 24; +} + +static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_part_number(void) +{ + return (read_cpuid_id() & 0xFFF0); +} + static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_cachetype(void) { return read_cpuid(CPUID_CACHETYPE); diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c index 8d7d8d4..ff18566 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c @@ -200,46 +200,46 @@ static struct arm_pmu *__devinit probe_current_pmu(void) struct arm_pmu *pmu = NULL; int cpu = get_cpu(); unsigned long cpuid = read_cpuid_id(); - unsigned long implementor = (cpuid & 0xFF000000) >> 24; - unsigned long part_number = (cpuid & 0xFFF0); + unsigned long implementor = read_cpuid_implementor(); + unsigned long part_number = read_cpuid_part_number(); pr_info("probing PMU on CPU %d\n", cpu); /* ARM Ltd CPUs. */ - if (0x41 == implementor) { + if (implementor == IMPLEMENTOR_ARM) { switch (part_number) { - case 0xB360: /* ARM1136 */ - case 0xB560: /* ARM1156 */ - case 0xB760: /* ARM1176 */ + case PART_NUMBER_ARM1136: + case PART_NUMBER_ARM1156: + case PART_NUMBER_ARM1176: pmu = armv6pmu_init(); break; - case 0xB020: /* ARM11mpcore */ + case PART_NUMBER_ARM11MPCORE: pmu = armv6mpcore_pmu_init(); break; - case 0xC080: /* Cortex-A8 */ + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A8: pmu = armv7_a8_pmu_init(); break; - case 0xC090: /* Cortex-A9 */ + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A9: pmu = armv7_a9_pmu_init(); break; - case 0xC050: /* Cortex-A5 */ + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A5: pmu = armv7_a5_pmu_init(); break; - case 0xC0F0: /* Cortex-A15 */ + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A15: pmu = armv7_a15_pmu_init(); break; - case 0xC070: /* Cortex-A7 */ + case PART_NUMBER_CORTEX_A7: pmu = armv7_a7_pmu_init(); break; } /* Intel CPUs [xscale]. */ - } else if (0x69 == implementor) { + } else if (implementor == IMPLEMENTOR_INTEL) { part_number = (cpuid >> 13) & 0x7; switch (part_number) { - case 1: + case PART_NUMBER_XSCALE1: pmu = xscale1pmu_init(); break; - case 2: + case PART_NUMBER_XSCALE2: pmu = xscale2pmu_init(); break; }