| Message ID | 1353889014-17142-4-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
Hi Simon, On Monday 26 November 2012 09:16:50 Simon Horman wrote: > This is a crude mechanism to allow the pfc driver to be registered through > device tree. The mofication of this is to provide a way for pfc gpios to be > looked up by device tree for devices which use pfc gpios. Indeed it's a bit of a hack :-) I'll see how I can rebase that on top of my PFC patch series. I'd rather avoid this intermediate step as it would make PFC rework more complex. > More specifically, the motivation is to allow the registration > of the card-detect gpio for the Micro-SD SDHI slot of the KZM9G board. > > Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> > --- > drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > include/linux/sh_pfc.h | 7 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c b/drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c > index 038fa07..322b927 100644 > --- a/drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c > +++ b/drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c > @@ -136,6 +136,19 @@ static void sh_pfc_gpio_setup(struct sh_pfc_chip *chip) > gc->ngpio = (pfc->last_gpio - pfc->first_gpio) + 1; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO > +static void > +sh_pfc_register_gpiochip_dt(struct sh_pfc *pfc, struct gpio_chip *chip) > +{ > + chip->of_node = pfc->of_node; > + chip->of_gpio_n_cells = pfc->of_gpio_n_cells; > + chip->of_xlate = pfc->of_xlate; > +} > +#else > +static void sh_pfc_register_gpiochip_dt(struct sh_pfc *pfc, > + struct gpio_chip *chip) {} > +#endif > + > int sh_pfc_register_gpiochip(struct sh_pfc *pfc) > { > struct sh_pfc_chip *chip; > @@ -153,6 +166,8 @@ int sh_pfc_register_gpiochip(struct sh_pfc *pfc) > if (unlikely(ret < 0)) > kfree(chip); > > + sh_pfc_register_gpiochip_dt(pfc, &chip->gpio_chip); > + > pr_info("%s handling gpio %d -> %d\n", > pfc->name, pfc->first_gpio, pfc->last_gpio); > > diff --git a/include/linux/sh_pfc.h b/include/linux/sh_pfc.h > index c19a092..9963370 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sh_pfc.h > +++ b/include/linux/sh_pfc.h > @@ -124,6 +124,13 @@ struct sh_pfc { > struct pfc_window *window; > > unsigned long unlock_reg; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO > + struct device_node *of_node; > + int of_gpio_n_cells; > + int (*of_xlate)(struct gpio_chip *gc, > + const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec, u32 *flags); > +#endif > }; > > /* XXX compat for now */
Hi Simon, On Monday 26 November 2012 09:16:50 Simon Horman wrote: > This is a crude mechanism to allow the pfc driver to > be registered through device tree. The mofication of this > is to provide a way for pfc gpios to be looked up by > device tree for devices which use pfc gpios. > > More specifically, the motivation is to allow the registration > of the card-detect gpio for the Micro-SD SDHI slot of the KZM9G board. I've just posted v2 of my PCF patches ("SH pin control and GPIO rework with OF support") that include OF support for GPIOs. This patch as well as patch 4/7 and the gpio node in patch 7/7 and shouldn't be required anymore. > Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> > --- > drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > include/linux/sh_pfc.h | 7 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c b/drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c > index 038fa07..322b927 100644 > --- a/drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c > +++ b/drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c > @@ -136,6 +136,19 @@ static void sh_pfc_gpio_setup(struct sh_pfc_chip *chip) > gc->ngpio = (pfc->last_gpio - pfc->first_gpio) + 1; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO > +static void > +sh_pfc_register_gpiochip_dt(struct sh_pfc *pfc, struct gpio_chip *chip) > +{ > + chip->of_node = pfc->of_node; > + chip->of_gpio_n_cells = pfc->of_gpio_n_cells; > + chip->of_xlate = pfc->of_xlate; > +} > +#else > +static void sh_pfc_register_gpiochip_dt(struct sh_pfc *pfc, > + struct gpio_chip *chip) {} > +#endif > + > int sh_pfc_register_gpiochip(struct sh_pfc *pfc) > { > struct sh_pfc_chip *chip; > @@ -153,6 +166,8 @@ int sh_pfc_register_gpiochip(struct sh_pfc *pfc) > if (unlikely(ret < 0)) > kfree(chip); > > + sh_pfc_register_gpiochip_dt(pfc, &chip->gpio_chip); > + > pr_info("%s handling gpio %d -> %d\n", > pfc->name, pfc->first_gpio, pfc->last_gpio); > > diff --git a/include/linux/sh_pfc.h b/include/linux/sh_pfc.h > index c19a092..9963370 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sh_pfc.h > +++ b/include/linux/sh_pfc.h > @@ -124,6 +124,13 @@ struct sh_pfc { > struct pfc_window *window; > > unsigned long unlock_reg; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO > + struct device_node *of_node; > + int of_gpio_n_cells; > + int (*of_xlate)(struct gpio_chip *gc, > + const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec, u32 *flags); > +#endif > }; > > /* XXX compat for now */
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 01:07:28AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Monday 26 November 2012 09:16:50 Simon Horman wrote: > > This is a crude mechanism to allow the pfc driver to > > be registered through device tree. The mofication of this > > is to provide a way for pfc gpios to be looked up by > > device tree for devices which use pfc gpios. > > > > More specifically, the motivation is to allow the registration > > of the card-detect gpio for the Micro-SD SDHI slot of the KZM9G board. > > I've just posted v2 of my PCF patches ("SH pin control and GPIO rework with OF > support") that include OF support for GPIOs. This patch as well as patch 4/7 > and the gpio node in patch 7/7 and shouldn't be required anymore. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c b/drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c index 038fa07..322b927 100644 --- a/drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c +++ b/drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c @@ -136,6 +136,19 @@ static void sh_pfc_gpio_setup(struct sh_pfc_chip *chip) gc->ngpio = (pfc->last_gpio - pfc->first_gpio) + 1; } +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO +static void +sh_pfc_register_gpiochip_dt(struct sh_pfc *pfc, struct gpio_chip *chip) +{ + chip->of_node = pfc->of_node; + chip->of_gpio_n_cells = pfc->of_gpio_n_cells; + chip->of_xlate = pfc->of_xlate; +} +#else +static void sh_pfc_register_gpiochip_dt(struct sh_pfc *pfc, + struct gpio_chip *chip) {} +#endif + int sh_pfc_register_gpiochip(struct sh_pfc *pfc) { struct sh_pfc_chip *chip; @@ -153,6 +166,8 @@ int sh_pfc_register_gpiochip(struct sh_pfc *pfc) if (unlikely(ret < 0)) kfree(chip); + sh_pfc_register_gpiochip_dt(pfc, &chip->gpio_chip); + pr_info("%s handling gpio %d -> %d\n", pfc->name, pfc->first_gpio, pfc->last_gpio); diff --git a/include/linux/sh_pfc.h b/include/linux/sh_pfc.h index c19a092..9963370 100644 --- a/include/linux/sh_pfc.h +++ b/include/linux/sh_pfc.h @@ -124,6 +124,13 @@ struct sh_pfc { struct pfc_window *window; unsigned long unlock_reg; + +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO + struct device_node *of_node; + int of_gpio_n_cells; + int (*of_xlate)(struct gpio_chip *gc, + const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec, u32 *flags); +#endif }; /* XXX compat for now */
This is a crude mechanism to allow the pfc driver to be registered through device tree. The mofication of this is to provide a way for pfc gpios to be looked up by device tree for devices which use pfc gpios. More specifically, the motivation is to allow the registration of the card-detect gpio for the Micro-SD SDHI slot of the KZM9G board. Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> --- drivers/sh/pfc/gpio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/sh_pfc.h | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)