Message ID | 1357673878-25591-1-git-send-email-zab@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 1/8/13 1:37 PM, Zach Brown wrote: > btrfs_cont_expand() tries to free an IS_ERR em as it gets an error from > btrfs_get_extent() and breaks out of its loop. > > An instance of -EEXIST was reported in the wild: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874407 > > I have no idea if that -EEXIST is surprising, or not. Regardless, this > error handling should be cleaned up to handle other reasonable errors > (ENOMEM, EIO; whatever). > > This seemed to be the only buggy freeing of the relatively rare IS_ERR > em so I opted to fix the caller rather than teach free_extent_map() to > use IS_ERR_OR_NULL(). > > Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Looks good (maybe IS_ERR_OR_NULL would be more future-proof, but *shrug*) Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c > index edd30ae..0bc7bb3 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c > @@ -3690,6 +3690,7 @@ int btrfs_cont_expand(struct inode *inode, loff_t oldsize, loff_t size) > block_end - cur_offset, 0); > if (IS_ERR(em)) { > err = PTR_ERR(em); > + em = NULL; > break; > } > last_byte = min(extent_map_end(em), block_end); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Looks good (maybe IS_ERR_OR_NULL would be more future-proof, but *shrug*)
Yeah. I don't feel strongly about it. I'm happy to do that, and dance
around the tree pulling out redundant 'em = NULL' bits that wouldn't be
needed, if anyone feels strongly about it.
- z
(*shrug*)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index edd30ae..0bc7bb3 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -3690,6 +3690,7 @@ int btrfs_cont_expand(struct inode *inode, loff_t oldsize, loff_t size) block_end - cur_offset, 0); if (IS_ERR(em)) { err = PTR_ERR(em); + em = NULL; break; } last_byte = min(extent_map_end(em), block_end);
btrfs_cont_expand() tries to free an IS_ERR em as it gets an error from btrfs_get_extent() and breaks out of its loop. An instance of -EEXIST was reported in the wild: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874407 I have no idea if that -EEXIST is surprising, or not. Regardless, this error handling should be cleaned up to handle other reasonable errors (ENOMEM, EIO; whatever). This seemed to be the only buggy freeing of the relatively rare IS_ERR em so I opted to fix the caller rather than teach free_extent_map() to use IS_ERR_OR_NULL(). Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)