Message ID | 1356513966-24945-1-git-send-email-kdorfman@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
I checked the changes. Thanks for your work. Reviewed-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> On Wednesday, December 26, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman wrote: > When current request is running on the bus and if next request fetched > by mmcqd is NULL, mmc context (mmcqd thread) gets blocked until the > current request completes. This means that if new request comes in while > the mmcqd thread is blocked, this new request can not be prepared in > parallel to current ongoing request. This may result in delaying the new > request execution and increase it's latency. > > This change allows to wake up the MMC thread on new request arrival. > Now once the MMC thread is woken up, a new request can be fetched and > prepared in parallel to the current running request which means this new > request can be started immediately after the current running request > completes. > > With this change read throughput is improved by 16%. > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org> > --- > v5: - Removed BUG() and BUG_ON() with proper error handling > - Turn on of is_waiting_last_req flag moved from queue.c into > block.c (mmc_blk_issue_req()) > - mmc_init_context_info() called from mmc_add_card(). It is > common point for MMC, SD, SDIO. > > v4: keeps new synchronization mechanism within mmc/core > layer, so mmc/core external API's are not changed. > - context_info moved into mmc_host struct > - context_info initialized in mmc_attach_mmc() > > v3: > - new MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST flag to mark new request case > - lock added to update is_new_req flag > - condition for sending new req notification changed > - Moved start waiting for new req notification > after fetching NULL > v2: > - Removed synchronization flags > - removed lock from done() > - flags names changed > v1: > - Initial submit > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > index 21056b9..f79b468 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c > @@ -113,17 +113,6 @@ struct mmc_blk_data { > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(open_lock); > > -enum mmc_blk_status { > - MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0, > - MMC_BLK_PARTIAL, > - MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR, > - MMC_BLK_RETRY, > - MMC_BLK_ABORT, > - MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR, > - MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR, > - MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM, > -}; > - > module_param(perdev_minors, int, 0444); > MODULE_PARM_DESC(perdev_minors, "Minors numbers to allocate per device"); > > @@ -1364,8 +1353,11 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc) > } else > areq = NULL; > areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, (int *) &status); > - if (!areq) > + if (!areq) { > + if (status == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST) > + mq->flags |= MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST; > return 0; > + } > > mq_rq = container_of(areq, struct mmc_queue_req, mmc_active); > brq = &mq_rq->brq; > @@ -1438,6 +1430,10 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc) > break; > case MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM: > goto cmd_abort; > + default: > + pr_err("%s: Unhandled return value (%d)", > + req->rq_disk->disk_name, status); > + goto cmd_abort; > } > > if (ret) { > @@ -1472,6 +1468,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req) > int ret; > struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->data; > struct mmc_card *card = md->queue.card; > + struct mmc_host *host = card->host; > + unsigned long flags; > > if (req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req) > /* claim host only for the first request */ > @@ -1486,6 +1484,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req) > goto out; > } > > + mq->flags &= ~MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST; > if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) { > /* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing discard */ > if (card->host->areq) > @@ -1501,11 +1500,16 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req) > mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(mq, NULL); > ret = mmc_blk_issue_flush(mq, req); > } else { > + if (!req && host->areq) { > + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->context_info.lock, flags); > + host->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = true; > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->context_info.lock, flags); > + } > ret = mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(mq, req); > } > > out: > - if (!req) > + if (!req && !(mq->flags & MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST)) > /* release host only when there are no more requests */ > mmc_release_host(card->host); > return ret; > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c > index fadf52e..2ab21a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c > @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ > > #define MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ 65536 > > -#define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED (1 << 0) > > /* > * Prepare a MMC request. This just filters out odd stuff. > @@ -68,6 +67,10 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d) > if (req || mq->mqrq_prev->req) { > set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > mq->issue_fn(mq, req); > + if (mq->flags & MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST) { > + mq->flags &= ~MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST; > + continue; /* fetch again */ > + } > > /* > * Current request becomes previous request > @@ -103,6 +106,8 @@ static void mmc_request_fn(struct request_queue *q) > { > struct mmc_queue *mq = q->queuedata; > struct request *req; > + unsigned long flags; > + struct mmc_context_info *cntx; > > if (!mq) { > while ((req = blk_fetch_request(q)) != NULL) { > @@ -112,7 +117,20 @@ static void mmc_request_fn(struct request_queue *q) > return; > } > > - if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req) > + cntx = &mq->card->host->context_info; > + if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && mq->mqrq_prev->req) { > + /* > + * New MMC request arrived when MMC thread may be > + * blocked on the previous request to be complete > + * with no current request fetched > + */ > + spin_lock_irqsave(&cntx->lock, flags); > + if (cntx->is_waiting_last_req) { > + cntx->is_new_req = true; > + wake_up_interruptible(&cntx->wait); > + } > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cntx->lock, flags); > + } else if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req) > wake_up_process(mq->thread); > } > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h > index d2a1eb4..e20c27b 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h > @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ struct mmc_queue { > struct task_struct *thread; > struct semaphore thread_sem; > unsigned int flags; > +#define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED (1 << 0) > +#define MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST (1 << 1) > + > int (*issue_fn)(struct mmc_queue *, struct request *); > void *data; > struct request_queue *queue; > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c > index 420cb67..e219c97 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c > @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ int mmc_add_card(struct mmc_card *card) > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS > mmc_add_card_debugfs(card); > #endif > + mmc_init_context_info(card->host); > > ret = device_add(&card->dev); > if (ret) > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > index aaed768..614e4d8 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > @@ -319,11 +319,44 @@ out: > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_start_bkops); > > +/* > + * mmc_wait_data_done() - done callback for data request > + * @mrq: done data request > + * > + * Wakes up mmc context, passed as a callback to host controller driver > + */ > +static void mmc_wait_data_done(struct mmc_request *mrq) > +{ > + mrq->host->context_info.is_done_rcv = true; > + wake_up_interruptible(&mrq->host->context_info.wait); > +} > + > static void mmc_wait_done(struct mmc_request *mrq) > { > complete(&mrq->completion); > } > > +/* > + *__mmc_start_data_req() - starts data request > + * @host: MMC host to start the request > + * @mrq: data request to start > + * > + * Sets the done callback to be called when request is completed by the card. > + * Starts data mmc request execution > + */ > +static int __mmc_start_data_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq) > +{ > + mrq->done = mmc_wait_data_done; > + mrq->host = host; > + if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) { > + mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM; > + return -ENOMEDIUM; > + } > + mmc_start_request(host, mrq); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq) > { > init_completion(&mrq->completion); > @@ -337,6 +370,62 @@ static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq) > return 0; > } > > +/* > + * mmc_wait_for_data_req_done() - wait for request completed > + * @host: MMC host to prepare the command. > + * @mrq: MMC request to wait for > + * > + * Blocks MMC context till host controller will ack end of data request > + * execution or new request notification arrives from the block layer. > + * Handles command retries. > + * > + * Returns enum mmc_blk_status after checking errors. > + */ > +static int mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(struct mmc_host *host, > + struct mmc_request *mrq, > + struct mmc_async_req *next_req) > +{ > + struct mmc_command *cmd; > + struct mmc_context_info *context_info = &host->context_info; > + int err; > + unsigned long flags; > + > + while (1) { > + wait_event_interruptible(context_info->wait, > + (context_info->is_done_rcv || > + context_info->is_new_req)); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&context_info->lock, flags); > + context_info->is_waiting_last_req = false; > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&context_info->lock, flags); > + if (context_info->is_done_rcv) { > + context_info->is_done_rcv = false; > + context_info->is_new_req = false; > + cmd = mrq->cmd; > + if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries || > + mmc_card_removed(host->card)) { > + err = host->areq->err_check(host->card, > + host->areq); > + break; /* return err */ > + } else { > + pr_info("%s: req failed (CMD%u): %d, retrying...\n", > + mmc_hostname(host), > + cmd->opcode, cmd->error); > + cmd->retries--; > + cmd->error = 0; > + host->ops->request(host, mrq); > + continue; /* wait for done/new event again */ > + } > + } else if (context_info->is_new_req) { > + context_info->is_new_req = false; > + if (!next_req) { > + err = MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST; > + break; /* return err */ > + } > + } > + } /* while */ > + return err; > +} > + > static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host, > struct mmc_request *mrq) > { > @@ -426,8 +515,17 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, > mmc_pre_req(host, areq->mrq, !host->areq); > > if (host->areq) { > - mmc_wait_for_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq); > - err = host->areq->err_check(host->card, host->areq); > + err = mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq, > + areq); > + if (err == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST) { > + if (error) > + *error = err; > + /* > + * The previous request was not completed, > + * nothing to return > + */ > + return NULL; > + } > /* > * Check BKOPS urgency for each R1 response > */ > @@ -439,7 +537,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, > } > > if (!err && areq) > - start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq); > + start_err = __mmc_start_data_req(host, areq->mrq); > > if (host->areq) > mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0); > @@ -2581,6 +2679,23 @@ int mmc_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *notify_block, > } > #endif > > +/** > + * mmc_init_context_info() - init synchronization context > + * @host: mmc host > + * > + * Init struct context_info needed to implement asynchronous > + * request mechanism, used by mmc core, host driver and mmc requests > + * supplier. > + */ > +void mmc_init_context_info(struct mmc_host *host) > +{ > + spin_lock_init(&host->context_info.lock); > + host->context_info.is_new_req = false; > + host->context_info.is_done_rcv = false; > + host->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = false; > + init_waitqueue_head(&host->context_info.wait); > +} > + > static int __init mmc_init(void) > { > int ret; > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.h b/drivers/mmc/core/core.h > index 3bdafbc..0272b32 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.h > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.h > @@ -76,5 +76,6 @@ void mmc_remove_host_debugfs(struct mmc_host *host); > void mmc_add_card_debugfs(struct mmc_card *card); > void mmc_remove_card_debugfs(struct mmc_card *card); > > +void mmc_init_context_info(struct mmc_host *host); > #endif > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h > index 5c69315..be2500a 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h > @@ -187,6 +187,18 @@ struct sdio_func_tuple; > > #define SDIO_MAX_FUNCS 7 > > +enum mmc_blk_status { > + MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0, > + MMC_BLK_PARTIAL, > + MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR, > + MMC_BLK_RETRY, > + MMC_BLK_ABORT, > + MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR, > + MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR, > + MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM, > + MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST, > +}; > + > /* The number of MMC physical partitions. These consist of: > * boot partitions (2), general purpose partitions (4) in MMC v4.4. > */ > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/core.h b/include/linux/mmc/core.h > index 5bf7c22..495d133 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mmc/core.h > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/core.h > @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ struct mmc_data { > s32 host_cookie; /* host private data */ > }; > > +struct mmc_host; > struct mmc_request { > struct mmc_command *sbc; /* SET_BLOCK_COUNT for multiblock */ > struct mmc_command *cmd; > @@ -128,9 +129,9 @@ struct mmc_request { > > struct completion completion; > void (*done)(struct mmc_request *);/* completion function */ > + struct mmc_host *host; > }; > > -struct mmc_host; > struct mmc_card; > struct mmc_async_req; > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h > index 61a10c1..82bf1a8 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h > @@ -170,6 +170,22 @@ struct mmc_slot { > void *handler_priv; > }; > > +/** > + * mmc_context_info - synchronization details for mmc context > + * @is_done_rcv wake up reason was done request > + * @is_new_req wake up reason was new request > + * @is_waiting_last_req mmc context waiting for single running request > + * @wait wait queue > + * @lock lock to protect data fields > + */ > +struct mmc_context_info { > + bool is_done_rcv; > + bool is_new_req; > + bool is_waiting_last_req; > + wait_queue_head_t wait; > + spinlock_t lock; > +}; > + > struct regulator; > > struct mmc_supply { > @@ -331,6 +347,7 @@ struct mmc_host { > struct dentry *debugfs_root; > > struct mmc_async_req *areq; /* active async req */ > + struct mmc_context_info context_info; /* async synchronization info */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_FAIL_MMC_REQUEST > struct fault_attr fail_mmc_request; > -- > 1.7.6 > -- > Konstantin Dorfman, > QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, > Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, > hosted by The Linux Foundation > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Konstantin, On Fri, Dec 28 2012, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > I checked the changes. Thanks for your work. > > Reviewed-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> > > On Wednesday, December 26, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman wrote: >> When current request is running on the bus and if next request fetched >> by mmcqd is NULL, mmc context (mmcqd thread) gets blocked until the >> current request completes. This means that if new request comes in while >> the mmcqd thread is blocked, this new request can not be prepared in >> parallel to current ongoing request. This may result in delaying the new >> request execution and increase it's latency. >> >> This change allows to wake up the MMC thread on new request arrival. >> Now once the MMC thread is woken up, a new request can be fetched and >> prepared in parallel to the current running request which means this new >> request can be started immediately after the current running request >> completes. >> >> With this change read throughput is improved by 16%. >> >> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> v5: - Removed BUG() and BUG_ON() with proper error handling >> - Turn on of is_waiting_last_req flag moved from queue.c into >> block.c (mmc_blk_issue_req()) >> - mmc_init_context_info() called from mmc_add_card(). It is >> common point for MMC, SD, SDIO. Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.9. Per, would you like to add an ACK here? - Chris.
On 01/14/2013 09:31 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Konstantin, > > On Fri, Dec 28 2012, Seungwon Jeon wrote: >> I checked the changes. Thanks for your work. >> >> Reviewed-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> >> >> On Wednesday, December 26, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman wrote: >>> When current request is running on the bus and if next request fetched >>> by mmcqd is NULL, mmc context (mmcqd thread) gets blocked until the >>> current request completes. This means that if new request comes in while >>> the mmcqd thread is blocked, this new request can not be prepared in >>> parallel to current ongoing request. This may result in delaying the new >>> request execution and increase it's latency. >>> >>> This change allows to wake up the MMC thread on new request arrival. >>> Now once the MMC thread is woken up, a new request can be fetched and >>> prepared in parallel to the current running request which means this new >>> request can be started immediately after the current running request >>> completes. >>> >>> With this change read throughput is improved by 16%. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org> >>> --- >>> v5: - Removed BUG() and BUG_ON() with proper error handling >>> - Turn on of is_waiting_last_req flag moved from queue.c into >>> block.c (mmc_blk_issue_req()) >>> - mmc_init_context_info() called from mmc_add_card(). It is >>> common point for MMC, SD, SDIO. > > Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.9. Great Chris, Thanks,
Hi Konstantin. Could you check this patch with [2/2]? [PATCH 2/2] mmc: block: don't start new request when the card is removed mmcqd is often sleeping with acquiring the claim(mmc_claim_host) when a card is removed. As a result, mmc_rescan can be blocked for the insertion of a card newly. It's a dead lock. Thanks, Seungwon Jeon On Tuesday, January 22, 2013, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > This patch is derived from 'mmc: fix async request mechanism ...'. > According as async transfer, a request is handled with twice mmc_start_req. > When the card is removed, the request is actually not issued in the first > mmc_start_req [__mmc_start_data_req]. And then mmc_wait_for_data_req_done > will come in the next mmc_start_req. But there is no event for completions. > wake_up_interruptible is needed in __mmc_start_data_req for the case of > removed card. > > Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > index 8b3a122..997b257 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ static int __mmc_start_data_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq) > mrq->host = host; > if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) { > mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM; > + mmc_wait_data_done(mrq); > return -ENOMEDIUM; > } > mmc_start_request(host, mrq); > -- > 1.7.0.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org> On 1/30/2013 12:00 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > Hi Konstantin. > > Could you check this patch with [2/2]? > [PATCH 2/2] mmc: block: don't start new request when the card is removed > > mmcqd is often sleeping with acquiring the claim(mmc_claim_host) when a card is removed. > As a result, mmc_rescan can be blocked for the insertion of a card newly. It's a dead lock. > > Thanks, > Seungwon Jeon > > On Tuesday, January 22, 2013, Seungwon Jeon wrote: >> This patch is derived from 'mmc: fix async request mechanism ...'. >> According as async transfer, a request is handled with twice mmc_start_req. >> When the card is removed, the request is actually not issued in the first >> mmc_start_req [__mmc_start_data_req]. And then mmc_wait_for_data_req_done >> will come in the next mmc_start_req. But there is no event for completions. >> wake_up_interruptible is needed in __mmc_start_data_req for the case of >> removed card. >> >> Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c >> index 8b3a122..997b257 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c >> @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ static int __mmc_start_data_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq) >> mrq->host = host; >> if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) { >> mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM; >> + mmc_wait_data_done(mrq); >> return -ENOMEDIUM; >> } >> mmc_start_request(host, mrq); >> -- >> 1.7.0.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Jeon, I'm working on this and will post results. Thanks, On 01/30/2013 08:30 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > Hi Konstantin. > > Could you check this patch with [2/2]? > [PATCH 2/2] mmc: block: don't start new request when the card is removed > > mmcqd is often sleeping with acquiring the claim(mmc_claim_host) when a card is removed. > As a result, mmc_rescan can be blocked for the insertion of a card newly. It's a dead lock. > > Thanks, > Seungwon Jeon > > On Tuesday, January 22, 2013, Seungwon Jeon wrote: >> This patch is derived from 'mmc: fix async request mechanism ...'. >> According as async transfer, a request is handled with twice mmc_start_req. >> When the card is removed, the request is actually not issued in the first >> mmc_start_req [__mmc_start_data_req]. And then mmc_wait_for_data_req_done >> will come in the next mmc_start_req. But there is no event for completions. >> wake_up_interruptible is needed in __mmc_start_data_req for the case of >> removed card. >> >> Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c >> index 8b3a122..997b257 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c >> @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ static int __mmc_start_data_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq) >> mrq->host = host; >> if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) { >> mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM; >> + mmc_wait_data_done(mrq); >> return -ENOMEDIUM; >> } >> mmc_start_request(host, mrq); >> -- >> 1.7.0.4 > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c index 21056b9..f79b468 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c @@ -113,17 +113,6 @@ struct mmc_blk_data { static DEFINE_MUTEX(open_lock); -enum mmc_blk_status { - MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0, - MMC_BLK_PARTIAL, - MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR, - MMC_BLK_RETRY, - MMC_BLK_ABORT, - MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR, - MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR, - MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM, -}; - module_param(perdev_minors, int, 0444); MODULE_PARM_DESC(perdev_minors, "Minors numbers to allocate per device"); @@ -1364,8 +1353,11 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc) } else areq = NULL; areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, (int *) &status); - if (!areq) + if (!areq) { + if (status == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST) + mq->flags |= MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST; return 0; + } mq_rq = container_of(areq, struct mmc_queue_req, mmc_active); brq = &mq_rq->brq; @@ -1438,6 +1430,10 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc) break; case MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM: goto cmd_abort; + default: + pr_err("%s: Unhandled return value (%d)", + req->rq_disk->disk_name, status); + goto cmd_abort; } if (ret) { @@ -1472,6 +1468,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req) int ret; struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->data; struct mmc_card *card = md->queue.card; + struct mmc_host *host = card->host; + unsigned long flags; if (req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req) /* claim host only for the first request */ @@ -1486,6 +1484,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req) goto out; } + mq->flags &= ~MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST; if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) { /* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing discard */ if (card->host->areq) @@ -1501,11 +1500,16 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req) mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(mq, NULL); ret = mmc_blk_issue_flush(mq, req); } else { + if (!req && host->areq) { + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->context_info.lock, flags); + host->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = true; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->context_info.lock, flags); + } ret = mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(mq, req); } out: - if (!req) + if (!req && !(mq->flags & MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST)) /* release host only when there are no more requests */ mmc_release_host(card->host); return ret; diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c index fadf52e..2ab21a0 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ #define MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ 65536 -#define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED (1 << 0) /* * Prepare a MMC request. This just filters out odd stuff. @@ -68,6 +67,10 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d) if (req || mq->mqrq_prev->req) { set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); mq->issue_fn(mq, req); + if (mq->flags & MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST) { + mq->flags &= ~MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST; + continue; /* fetch again */ + } /* * Current request becomes previous request @@ -103,6 +106,8 @@ static void mmc_request_fn(struct request_queue *q) { struct mmc_queue *mq = q->queuedata; struct request *req; + unsigned long flags; + struct mmc_context_info *cntx; if (!mq) { while ((req = blk_fetch_request(q)) != NULL) { @@ -112,7 +117,20 @@ static void mmc_request_fn(struct request_queue *q) return; } - if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req) + cntx = &mq->card->host->context_info; + if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && mq->mqrq_prev->req) { + /* + * New MMC request arrived when MMC thread may be + * blocked on the previous request to be complete + * with no current request fetched + */ + spin_lock_irqsave(&cntx->lock, flags); + if (cntx->is_waiting_last_req) { + cntx->is_new_req = true; + wake_up_interruptible(&cntx->wait); + } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cntx->lock, flags); + } else if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req) wake_up_process(mq->thread); } diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h index d2a1eb4..e20c27b 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ struct mmc_queue { struct task_struct *thread; struct semaphore thread_sem; unsigned int flags; +#define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED (1 << 0) +#define MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST (1 << 1) + int (*issue_fn)(struct mmc_queue *, struct request *); void *data; struct request_queue *queue; diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c index 420cb67..e219c97 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/bus.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ int mmc_add_card(struct mmc_card *card) #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS mmc_add_card_debugfs(card); #endif + mmc_init_context_info(card->host); ret = device_add(&card->dev); if (ret) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c index aaed768..614e4d8 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c @@ -319,11 +319,44 @@ out: } EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_start_bkops); +/* + * mmc_wait_data_done() - done callback for data request + * @mrq: done data request + * + * Wakes up mmc context, passed as a callback to host controller driver + */ +static void mmc_wait_data_done(struct mmc_request *mrq) +{ + mrq->host->context_info.is_done_rcv = true; + wake_up_interruptible(&mrq->host->context_info.wait); +} + static void mmc_wait_done(struct mmc_request *mrq) { complete(&mrq->completion); } +/* + *__mmc_start_data_req() - starts data request + * @host: MMC host to start the request + * @mrq: data request to start + * + * Sets the done callback to be called when request is completed by the card. + * Starts data mmc request execution + */ +static int __mmc_start_data_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq) +{ + mrq->done = mmc_wait_data_done; + mrq->host = host; + if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) { + mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM; + return -ENOMEDIUM; + } + mmc_start_request(host, mrq); + + return 0; +} + static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq) { init_completion(&mrq->completion); @@ -337,6 +370,62 @@ static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq) return 0; } +/* + * mmc_wait_for_data_req_done() - wait for request completed + * @host: MMC host to prepare the command. + * @mrq: MMC request to wait for + * + * Blocks MMC context till host controller will ack end of data request + * execution or new request notification arrives from the block layer. + * Handles command retries. + * + * Returns enum mmc_blk_status after checking errors. + */ +static int mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(struct mmc_host *host, + struct mmc_request *mrq, + struct mmc_async_req *next_req) +{ + struct mmc_command *cmd; + struct mmc_context_info *context_info = &host->context_info; + int err; + unsigned long flags; + + while (1) { + wait_event_interruptible(context_info->wait, + (context_info->is_done_rcv || + context_info->is_new_req)); + spin_lock_irqsave(&context_info->lock, flags); + context_info->is_waiting_last_req = false; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&context_info->lock, flags); + if (context_info->is_done_rcv) { + context_info->is_done_rcv = false; + context_info->is_new_req = false; + cmd = mrq->cmd; + if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries || + mmc_card_removed(host->card)) { + err = host->areq->err_check(host->card, + host->areq); + break; /* return err */ + } else { + pr_info("%s: req failed (CMD%u): %d, retrying...\n", + mmc_hostname(host), + cmd->opcode, cmd->error); + cmd->retries--; + cmd->error = 0; + host->ops->request(host, mrq); + continue; /* wait for done/new event again */ + } + } else if (context_info->is_new_req) { + context_info->is_new_req = false; + if (!next_req) { + err = MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST; + break; /* return err */ + } + } + } /* while */ + return err; +} + static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq) { @@ -426,8 +515,17 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, mmc_pre_req(host, areq->mrq, !host->areq); if (host->areq) { - mmc_wait_for_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq); - err = host->areq->err_check(host->card, host->areq); + err = mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq, + areq); + if (err == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST) { + if (error) + *error = err; + /* + * The previous request was not completed, + * nothing to return + */ + return NULL; + } /* * Check BKOPS urgency for each R1 response */ @@ -439,7 +537,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, } if (!err && areq) - start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq); + start_err = __mmc_start_data_req(host, areq->mrq); if (host->areq) mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0); @@ -2581,6 +2679,23 @@ int mmc_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *notify_block, } #endif +/** + * mmc_init_context_info() - init synchronization context + * @host: mmc host + * + * Init struct context_info needed to implement asynchronous + * request mechanism, used by mmc core, host driver and mmc requests + * supplier. + */ +void mmc_init_context_info(struct mmc_host *host) +{ + spin_lock_init(&host->context_info.lock); + host->context_info.is_new_req = false; + host->context_info.is_done_rcv = false; + host->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = false; + init_waitqueue_head(&host->context_info.wait); +} + static int __init mmc_init(void) { int ret; diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.h b/drivers/mmc/core/core.h index 3bdafbc..0272b32 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.h +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.h @@ -76,5 +76,6 @@ void mmc_remove_host_debugfs(struct mmc_host *host); void mmc_add_card_debugfs(struct mmc_card *card); void mmc_remove_card_debugfs(struct mmc_card *card); +void mmc_init_context_info(struct mmc_host *host); #endif diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h index 5c69315..be2500a 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h @@ -187,6 +187,18 @@ struct sdio_func_tuple; #define SDIO_MAX_FUNCS 7 +enum mmc_blk_status { + MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0, + MMC_BLK_PARTIAL, + MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR, + MMC_BLK_RETRY, + MMC_BLK_ABORT, + MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR, + MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR, + MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM, + MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST, +}; + /* The number of MMC physical partitions. These consist of: * boot partitions (2), general purpose partitions (4) in MMC v4.4. */ diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/core.h b/include/linux/mmc/core.h index 5bf7c22..495d133 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmc/core.h +++ b/include/linux/mmc/core.h @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ struct mmc_data { s32 host_cookie; /* host private data */ }; +struct mmc_host; struct mmc_request { struct mmc_command *sbc; /* SET_BLOCK_COUNT for multiblock */ struct mmc_command *cmd; @@ -128,9 +129,9 @@ struct mmc_request { struct completion completion; void (*done)(struct mmc_request *);/* completion function */ + struct mmc_host *host; }; -struct mmc_host; struct mmc_card; struct mmc_async_req; diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h index 61a10c1..82bf1a8 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h @@ -170,6 +170,22 @@ struct mmc_slot { void *handler_priv; }; +/** + * mmc_context_info - synchronization details for mmc context + * @is_done_rcv wake up reason was done request + * @is_new_req wake up reason was new request + * @is_waiting_last_req mmc context waiting for single running request + * @wait wait queue + * @lock lock to protect data fields + */ +struct mmc_context_info { + bool is_done_rcv; + bool is_new_req; + bool is_waiting_last_req; + wait_queue_head_t wait; + spinlock_t lock; +}; + struct regulator; struct mmc_supply { @@ -331,6 +347,7 @@ struct mmc_host { struct dentry *debugfs_root; struct mmc_async_req *areq; /* active async req */ + struct mmc_context_info context_info; /* async synchronization info */ #ifdef CONFIG_FAIL_MMC_REQUEST struct fault_attr fail_mmc_request;
When current request is running on the bus and if next request fetched by mmcqd is NULL, mmc context (mmcqd thread) gets blocked until the current request completes. This means that if new request comes in while the mmcqd thread is blocked, this new request can not be prepared in parallel to current ongoing request. This may result in delaying the new request execution and increase it's latency. This change allows to wake up the MMC thread on new request arrival. Now once the MMC thread is woken up, a new request can be fetched and prepared in parallel to the current running request which means this new request can be started immediately after the current running request completes. With this change read throughput is improved by 16%. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org> --- v5: - Removed BUG() and BUG_ON() with proper error handling - Turn on of is_waiting_last_req flag moved from queue.c into block.c (mmc_blk_issue_req()) - mmc_init_context_info() called from mmc_add_card(). It is common point for MMC, SD, SDIO. v4: keeps new synchronization mechanism within mmc/core layer, so mmc/core external API's are not changed. - context_info moved into mmc_host struct - context_info initialized in mmc_attach_mmc() v3: - new MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST flag to mark new request case - lock added to update is_new_req flag - condition for sending new req notification changed - Moved start waiting for new req notification after fetching NULL v2: - Removed synchronization flags - removed lock from done() - flags names changed v1: - Initial submit