| Message ID | 1362227906-13921-1-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
? 2013/3/2 20:38, Sylwester Nawrocki ??: > Since the DMA controller clocks are managed at amba bus level, > the PL330 device clocks handling has been removed from the driver > in commit 7c71b8eb268ee38235f7e924d943ea9d90e59469 > DMA: PL330: Remove redundant runtime_suspend/resume functions > > However, this left the S5PV210 platform with only clkdev entries > linking "apb_pclk" clock conn_id to a dummy clock, rather than > to corresponding platform PL330 DMAC clock. > As a result the DMA controller is now attempted to be used on > S5PV210 with the clock disabled and the driver fails with an > error: > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: PERIPH_ID 0x0, PCELL_ID 0x0 ! > dma-pl330: probe of dma-pl330.0 failed with error -22 > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.1: PERIPH_ID 0x0, PCELL_ID 0x0 ! > dma-pl330: probe of dma-pl330.1 failed with error -22 > > Fix this by adding "apb_pclk" clkdev entries for the Peripheral > DMA controllers 0/1 and removing the dummy apb_pclk clock. > > Reported-by: Lonsn <lonsn2005@gmail.com> > Cc: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@linaro.org> > Cc: Boojin Kim <boojin.kim@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> > --- > > Lonsn, could you check if this patch solves the problem for you, > please ? Any Tested-by are welcome. > I didn't test this patch on any hardware yet. Once it is confirmed > I would resend it, also for stable kernels. It seems this issue is > present since v3.7. > Sylwester, I have tested this patch and confirmed it's OK in my S5PV210 platform. > Thanks. > --- > arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > index fcdf52d..f051f53 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c > @@ -214,11 +214,6 @@ static struct clk clk_pcmcdclk2 = { > .name = "pcmcdclk", > }; > > -static struct clk dummy_apb_pclk = { > - .name = "apb_pclk", > - .id = -1, > -}; > - > static struct clk *clkset_vpllsrc_list[] = { > [0] = &clk_fin_vpll, > [1] = &clk_sclk_hdmi27m, > @@ -305,18 +300,6 @@ static struct clk_ops clk_fout_apll_ops = { > > static struct clk init_clocks_off[] = { > { > - .name = "dma", > - .devname = "dma-pl330.0", > - .parent = &clk_hclk_psys.clk, > - .enable = s5pv210_clk_ip0_ctrl, > - .ctrlbit = (1 << 3), > - }, { > - .name = "dma", > - .devname = "dma-pl330.1", > - .parent = &clk_hclk_psys.clk, > - .enable = s5pv210_clk_ip0_ctrl, > - .ctrlbit = (1 << 4), > - }, { > .name = "rot", > .parent = &clk_hclk_dsys.clk, > .enable = s5pv210_clk_ip0_ctrl, > @@ -573,6 +556,20 @@ static struct clk clk_hsmmc3 = { > .ctrlbit = (1<<19), > }; > > +static struct clk clk_pdma0 = { > + .name = "pdma0", > + .parent = &clk_hclk_psys.clk, > + .enable = s5pv210_clk_ip0_ctrl, > + .ctrlbit = (1 << 3), > +}; > + > +static struct clk clk_pdma1 = { > + .name = "pdma1", > + .parent = &clk_hclk_psys.clk, > + .enable = s5pv210_clk_ip0_ctrl, > + .ctrlbit = (1 << 4), > +}; > + > static struct clk *clkset_uart_list[] = { > [6] = &clk_mout_mpll.clk, > [7] = &clk_mout_epll.clk, > @@ -1075,6 +1072,8 @@ static struct clk *clk_cdev[] = { > &clk_hsmmc1, > &clk_hsmmc2, > &clk_hsmmc3, > + &clk_pdma0, > + &clk_pdma1, > }; > > /* Clock initialisation code */ > @@ -1333,6 +1332,8 @@ static struct clk_lookup s5pv210_clk_lookup[] = { > CLKDEV_INIT(NULL, "spi_busclk0", &clk_p), > CLKDEV_INIT("s5pv210-spi.0", "spi_busclk1", &clk_sclk_spi0.clk), > CLKDEV_INIT("s5pv210-spi.1", "spi_busclk1", &clk_sclk_spi1.clk), > + CLKDEV_INIT("dma-pl330.0", "apb_pclk", &clk_pdma0), > + CLKDEV_INIT("dma-pl330.1", "apb_pclk", &clk_pdma1), > }; > > void __init s5pv210_register_clocks(void) > @@ -1361,6 +1362,5 @@ void __init s5pv210_register_clocks(void) > for (ptr = 0; ptr < ARRAY_SIZE(clk_cdev); ptr++) > s3c_disable_clocks(clk_cdev[ptr], 1); > > - s3c24xx_register_clock(&dummy_apb_pclk); > s3c_pwmclk_init(); > } > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Lonsn wrote: > > ? 2013/3/2 20:38, Sylwester Nawrocki ??: > > Since the DMA controller clocks are managed at amba bus level, > > the PL330 device clocks handling has been removed from the driver > > in commit 7c71b8eb268ee38235f7e924d943ea9d90e59469 > > DMA: PL330: Remove redundant runtime_suspend/resume functions > > > > However, this left the S5PV210 platform with only clkdev entries > > linking "apb_pclk" clock conn_id to a dummy clock, rather than > > to corresponding platform PL330 DMAC clock. > > As a result the DMA controller is now attempted to be used on > > S5PV210 with the clock disabled and the driver fails with an > > error: > > > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: PERIPH_ID 0x0, PCELL_ID 0x0 ! > > dma-pl330: probe of dma-pl330.0 failed with error -22 > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.1: PERIPH_ID 0x0, PCELL_ID 0x0 ! > > dma-pl330: probe of dma-pl330.1 failed with error -22 > > > > Fix this by adding "apb_pclk" clkdev entries for the Peripheral > > DMA controllers 0/1 and removing the dummy apb_pclk clock. > > > > Reported-by: Lonsn <lonsn2005@gmail.com> > > Cc: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@linaro.org> > > Cc: Boojin Kim <boojin.kim@samsung.com> > > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> > > --- > > > > Lonsn, could you check if this patch solves the problem for you, > > please ? Any Tested-by are welcome. > > I didn't test this patch on any hardware yet. Once it is confirmed > > I would resend it, also for stable kernels. It seems this issue is > > present since v3.7. > > > Sylwester, I have tested this patch and confirmed it's OK in my S5PV210 > platform. > Looks good to me, applied into -fixes. Sylwester, why did you want to re-send this patch? Thanks. - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 03/04/2013 02:00 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Looks good to me, applied into -fixes. > > Sylwester, why did you want to re-send this patch? Only to add Tested-by: Lonsn <lonsn2005@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.7 tags, and any other in case someone else tests the patch. I think we would need this fix for stable 3.7 as well. Thanks for applying it. Regards, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > On 03/04/2013 02:00 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Looks good to me, applied into -fixes. > > > > Sylwester, why did you want to re-send this patch? > > Only to add > > Tested-by: Lonsn <lonsn2005@gmail.com> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.7 > > tags, and any other in case someone else tests the patch. > > I think we would need this fix for stable 3.7 as well. > > Thanks for applying it. > I already added above when I applied ;-) Thanks for your confirmation. - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c index fcdf52d..f051f53 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c @@ -214,11 +214,6 @@ static struct clk clk_pcmcdclk2 = { .name = "pcmcdclk", }; -static struct clk dummy_apb_pclk = { - .name = "apb_pclk", - .id = -1, -}; - static struct clk *clkset_vpllsrc_list[] = { [0] = &clk_fin_vpll, [1] = &clk_sclk_hdmi27m, @@ -305,18 +300,6 @@ static struct clk_ops clk_fout_apll_ops = { static struct clk init_clocks_off[] = { { - .name = "dma", - .devname = "dma-pl330.0", - .parent = &clk_hclk_psys.clk, - .enable = s5pv210_clk_ip0_ctrl, - .ctrlbit = (1 << 3), - }, { - .name = "dma", - .devname = "dma-pl330.1", - .parent = &clk_hclk_psys.clk, - .enable = s5pv210_clk_ip0_ctrl, - .ctrlbit = (1 << 4), - }, { .name = "rot", .parent = &clk_hclk_dsys.clk, .enable = s5pv210_clk_ip0_ctrl, @@ -573,6 +556,20 @@ static struct clk clk_hsmmc3 = { .ctrlbit = (1<<19), }; +static struct clk clk_pdma0 = { + .name = "pdma0", + .parent = &clk_hclk_psys.clk, + .enable = s5pv210_clk_ip0_ctrl, + .ctrlbit = (1 << 3), +}; + +static struct clk clk_pdma1 = { + .name = "pdma1", + .parent = &clk_hclk_psys.clk, + .enable = s5pv210_clk_ip0_ctrl, + .ctrlbit = (1 << 4), +}; + static struct clk *clkset_uart_list[] = { [6] = &clk_mout_mpll.clk, [7] = &clk_mout_epll.clk, @@ -1075,6 +1072,8 @@ static struct clk *clk_cdev[] = { &clk_hsmmc1, &clk_hsmmc2, &clk_hsmmc3, + &clk_pdma0, + &clk_pdma1, }; /* Clock initialisation code */ @@ -1333,6 +1332,8 @@ static struct clk_lookup s5pv210_clk_lookup[] = { CLKDEV_INIT(NULL, "spi_busclk0", &clk_p), CLKDEV_INIT("s5pv210-spi.0", "spi_busclk1", &clk_sclk_spi0.clk), CLKDEV_INIT("s5pv210-spi.1", "spi_busclk1", &clk_sclk_spi1.clk), + CLKDEV_INIT("dma-pl330.0", "apb_pclk", &clk_pdma0), + CLKDEV_INIT("dma-pl330.1", "apb_pclk", &clk_pdma1), }; void __init s5pv210_register_clocks(void) @@ -1361,6 +1362,5 @@ void __init s5pv210_register_clocks(void) for (ptr = 0; ptr < ARRAY_SIZE(clk_cdev); ptr++) s3c_disable_clocks(clk_cdev[ptr], 1); - s3c24xx_register_clock(&dummy_apb_pclk); s3c_pwmclk_init(); }
Since the DMA controller clocks are managed at amba bus level, the PL330 device clocks handling has been removed from the driver in commit 7c71b8eb268ee38235f7e924d943ea9d90e59469 DMA: PL330: Remove redundant runtime_suspend/resume functions However, this left the S5PV210 platform with only clkdev entries linking "apb_pclk" clock conn_id to a dummy clock, rather than to corresponding platform PL330 DMAC clock. As a result the DMA controller is now attempted to be used on S5PV210 with the clock disabled and the driver fails with an error: dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: PERIPH_ID 0x0, PCELL_ID 0x0 ! dma-pl330: probe of dma-pl330.0 failed with error -22 dma-pl330 dma-pl330.1: PERIPH_ID 0x0, PCELL_ID 0x0 ! dma-pl330: probe of dma-pl330.1 failed with error -22 Fix this by adding "apb_pclk" clkdev entries for the Peripheral DMA controllers 0/1 and removing the dummy apb_pclk clock. Reported-by: Lonsn <lonsn2005@gmail.com> Cc: Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@linaro.org> Cc: Boojin Kim <boojin.kim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> --- Lonsn, could you check if this patch solves the problem for you, please ? Any Tested-by are welcome. I didn't test this patch on any hardware yet. Once it is confirmed I would resend it, also for stable kernels. It seems this issue is present since v3.7. Thanks. --- arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)