diff mbox

[3/3] dw_mmc: Handle unaligned data submission correctly

Message ID 1363085593-22214-3-git-send-email-markos.chandras@imgtec.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Markos Chandras March 12, 2013, 10:53 a.m. UTC
Commit f9c2a0dc42a6938ff2a80e55ca2bbd1d5581c72e
"mmc: dw_mmc: Fix PIO mode with support of highmem" introduced
a regression since v3.2 making the mmc_test hang on test #13
with a "Data starvation by host timeout" interrupt.

This is because, sg_mapping_iter is used to iterate through the
data which spans on multiple pages. The problem is detected on
unaligned data submission where the code previously checked for
!(sg_next(host->sg)) which is true because we only have a single
scatter/gather list which then expands to multiple pages.
Therefore, the driver incorrectly assumed that this was the last
list item and submitted unaligned data to the mmc device. This
overflowed the FIFO on the device before all the data were written
to it. The code was fixed to only submit unaligned data when we are
handling the last sg_miter item by checking whether we reached
the desired data length or not.

The patch was tested against mmc_test and all the tests passed.

Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
Cc: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
---
The patch is based on Chris Ball's mmc-next branch

 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Chris Ball March 22, 2013, 4:52 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On Tue, Mar 12 2013, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Commit f9c2a0dc42a6938ff2a80e55ca2bbd1d5581c72e
> "mmc: dw_mmc: Fix PIO mode with support of highmem" introduced
> a regression since v3.2 making the mmc_test hang on test #13
> with a "Data starvation by host timeout" interrupt.
>
> This is because, sg_mapping_iter is used to iterate through the
> data which spans on multiple pages. The problem is detected on
> unaligned data submission where the code previously checked for
> !(sg_next(host->sg)) which is true because we only have a single
> scatter/gather list which then expands to multiple pages.
> Therefore, the driver incorrectly assumed that this was the last
> list item and submitted unaligned data to the mmc device. This
> overflowed the FIFO on the device before all the data were written
> to it. The code was fixed to only submit unaligned data when we are
> handling the last sg_miter item by checking whether we reached
> the desired data length or not.
>
> The patch was tested against mmc_test and all the tests passed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
> Cc: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
> Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>

Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.10.

- Chris.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
index 4e7a5c8..d3f68d4 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
@@ -1191,12 +1191,15 @@  static void dw_mci_pull_final_bytes(struct dw_mci *host, void *buf, int cnt)
 
 static void dw_mci_push_data16(struct dw_mci *host, void *buf, int cnt)
 {
+	struct mmc_data *data = host->data;
+	int init_cnt = cnt;
+
 	/* try and push anything in the part_buf */
 	if (unlikely(host->part_buf_count)) {
 		int len = dw_mci_push_part_bytes(host, buf, cnt);
 		buf += len;
 		cnt -= len;
-		if (!sg_next(host->sg) || host->part_buf_count == 2) {
+		if (host->part_buf_count == 2) {
 			mci_writew(host, DATA(host->data_offset),
 					host->part_buf16);
 			host->part_buf_count = 0;
@@ -1229,9 +1232,11 @@  static void dw_mci_push_data16(struct dw_mci *host, void *buf, int cnt)
 	/* put anything remaining in the part_buf */
 	if (cnt) {
 		dw_mci_set_part_bytes(host, buf, cnt);
-		if (!sg_next(host->sg))
+		 /* Push data if we have reached the expected data length */
+		if ((data->bytes_xfered + init_cnt) ==
+		    (data->blksz * data->blocks))
 			mci_writew(host, DATA(host->data_offset),
-					host->part_buf16);
+				   host->part_buf16);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1269,12 +1274,15 @@  static void dw_mci_pull_data16(struct dw_mci *host, void *buf, int cnt)
 
 static void dw_mci_push_data32(struct dw_mci *host, void *buf, int cnt)
 {
+	struct mmc_data *data = host->data;
+	int init_cnt = cnt;
+
 	/* try and push anything in the part_buf */
 	if (unlikely(host->part_buf_count)) {
 		int len = dw_mci_push_part_bytes(host, buf, cnt);
 		buf += len;
 		cnt -= len;
-		if (!sg_next(host->sg) || host->part_buf_count == 4) {
+		if (host->part_buf_count == 4) {
 			mci_writel(host, DATA(host->data_offset),
 					host->part_buf32);
 			host->part_buf_count = 0;
@@ -1307,9 +1315,11 @@  static void dw_mci_push_data32(struct dw_mci *host, void *buf, int cnt)
 	/* put anything remaining in the part_buf */
 	if (cnt) {
 		dw_mci_set_part_bytes(host, buf, cnt);
-		if (!sg_next(host->sg))
+		 /* Push data if we have reached the expected data length */
+		if ((data->bytes_xfered + init_cnt) ==
+		    (data->blksz * data->blocks))
 			mci_writel(host, DATA(host->data_offset),
-						host->part_buf32);
+				   host->part_buf32);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1347,12 +1357,15 @@  static void dw_mci_pull_data32(struct dw_mci *host, void *buf, int cnt)
 
 static void dw_mci_push_data64(struct dw_mci *host, void *buf, int cnt)
 {
+	struct mmc_data *data = host->data;
+	int init_cnt = cnt;
+
 	/* try and push anything in the part_buf */
 	if (unlikely(host->part_buf_count)) {
 		int len = dw_mci_push_part_bytes(host, buf, cnt);
 		buf += len;
 		cnt -= len;
-		if (!sg_next(host->sg) || host->part_buf_count == 8) {
+		if (host->part_buf_count == 8) {
 			mci_writew(host, DATA(host->data_offset),
 					host->part_buf);
 			host->part_buf_count = 0;
@@ -1385,9 +1398,11 @@  static void dw_mci_push_data64(struct dw_mci *host, void *buf, int cnt)
 	/* put anything remaining in the part_buf */
 	if (cnt) {
 		dw_mci_set_part_bytes(host, buf, cnt);
-		if (!sg_next(host->sg))
+		/* Push data if we have reached the expected data length */
+		if ((data->bytes_xfered + init_cnt) ==
+		    (data->blksz * data->blocks))
 			mci_writeq(host, DATA(host->data_offset),
-					host->part_buf);
+				   host->part_buf);
 	}
 }