Message ID | 1370281990-15090-3-git-send-email-mturquette@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Mike, I think it's a multiplexEr clock in the patch title, and see below Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 19:53:09 schrieb Mike Turquette: > Device Tree binding for the basic clock multiplexor, plus the setup > function to register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock > binding. > > Also relocate declaration of of_fixed_factor_clk_setup to keep things > tidy. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> [...] > + > + reg = of_iomap(node, 0); > + pr_err("%s: reg is 0x%p\n", __func__, reg); > + > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "mask", &mask)) { > + pr_err("%s: missing mask property for %s\n", __func__, node->name); > + return; > + } > + > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "shift", &shift)) > + pr_debug("%s: missing shift property defaults to zero for %s\n", > + __func__, node->name); > + > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "index_one")) > + clk_mux_flags |= CLK_MUX_INDEX_ONE; > + > + clk = clk_register_mux_table(NULL, clk_name, parent_names, num_parents, > + 0, reg, 0, mask, clk_mux_flags, ^- should probably be shift Otherwise looks cool and I'm currently trying it with my Rockchip code. Heiko
Quoting Heiko Stübner (2013-06-03 12:33:19) > Hi Mike, > > I think it's a multiplexEr clock in the patch title, and see below > Doh, you are right. But "xor" is so much cooler looking than "xer"... > > Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 19:53:09 schrieb Mike Turquette: > > Device Tree binding for the basic clock multiplexor, plus the setup > > function to register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock > > binding. > > > > Also relocate declaration of of_fixed_factor_clk_setup to keep things > > tidy. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> > > [...] > > > + > > + reg = of_iomap(node, 0); > > + pr_err("%s: reg is 0x%p\n", __func__, reg); > > + > > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "mask", &mask)) { > > + pr_err("%s: missing mask property for %s\n", __func__, node->name); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "shift", &shift)) > > + pr_debug("%s: missing shift property defaults to zero for %s\n", > > + __func__, node->name); > > + > > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "index_one")) > > + clk_mux_flags |= CLK_MUX_INDEX_ONE; > > + > > + clk = clk_register_mux_table(NULL, clk_name, parent_names, num_parents, > > + 0, reg, 0, mask, clk_mux_flags, > > ^- should probably be shift > > > Otherwise looks cool and I'm currently trying it with my Rockchip code. > Right again. My test platform seems to not shift the mask at all so this did not cause a visible bug for me. Thanks for the review, Mike > > Heiko
Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 22:07:22 schrieb Mike Turquette: > Quoting Heiko Stübner (2013-06-03 12:33:19) > > > Hi Mike, > > > > I think it's a multiplexEr clock in the patch title, and see below > > Doh, you are right. But "xor" is so much cooler looking than "xer"... > > > Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 19:53:09 schrieb Mike Turquette: > > > Device Tree binding for the basic clock multiplexor, plus the setup > > > function to register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock > > > binding. > > > > > > Also relocate declaration of of_fixed_factor_clk_setup to keep things > > > tidy. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> > > > > [...] > > > > > + > > > + reg = of_iomap(node, 0); > > > + pr_err("%s: reg is 0x%p\n", __func__, reg); > > > + > > > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "mask", &mask)) { > > > + pr_err("%s: missing mask property for %s\n", __func__, > > > node->name); + return; > > > + } > > > + > > > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "shift", &shift)) > > > + pr_debug("%s: missing shift property defaults to zero for > > > %s\n", + __func__, node->name); > > > + > > > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "index_one")) > > > + clk_mux_flags |= CLK_MUX_INDEX_ONE; > > > + > > > + clk = clk_register_mux_table(NULL, clk_name, parent_names, > > > num_parents, + 0, reg, 0, mask, clk_mux_flags, > > > > > ^- should probably be shift > > > > Otherwise looks cool and I'm currently trying it with my Rockchip code. > > Right again. My test platform seems to not shift the mask at all so > this did not cause a visible bug for me. I'm currently converting my rockchip stuff to it, as it would solve a lot of problems with the numerous clock types I'm defining just to put the shift and mask values somewhere. So lets see if anything more turns up ;-)
Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 22:15:45 schrieb Heiko Stübner: > Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 22:07:22 schrieb Mike Turquette: > > Quoting Heiko Stübner (2013-06-03 12:33:19) > > > > > Hi Mike, > > > > > > I think it's a multiplexEr clock in the patch title, and see below > > > > Doh, you are right. But "xor" is so much cooler looking than "xer"... > > > > > Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 19:53:09 schrieb Mike Turquette: > > > > Device Tree binding for the basic clock multiplexor, plus the setup > > > > function to register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock > > > > binding. > > > > > > > > Also relocate declaration of of_fixed_factor_clk_setup to keep things > > > > tidy. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > + > > > > + reg = of_iomap(node, 0); > > > > + pr_err("%s: reg is 0x%p\n", __func__, reg); > > > > + > > > > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "mask", &mask)) { > > > > + pr_err("%s: missing mask property for %s\n", __func__, > > > > node->name); + return; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "shift", &shift)) > > > > + pr_debug("%s: missing shift property defaults to zero > > > > for %s\n", + __func__, node->name); > > > > + > > > > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "index_one")) > > > > + clk_mux_flags |= CLK_MUX_INDEX_ONE; > > > > + > > > > + clk = clk_register_mux_table(NULL, clk_name, parent_names, > > > > num_parents, + 0, reg, 0, mask, clk_mux_flags, > > > > > > > ^- should probably be shift > > > > > > Otherwise looks cool and I'm currently trying it with my Rockchip code. > > > > Right again. My test platform seems to not shift the mask at all so > > this did not cause a visible bug for me. > > I'm currently converting my rockchip stuff to it, as it would solve a lot > of problems with the numerous clock types I'm defining just to put the > shift and mask values somewhere. > > So lets see if anything more turns up ;-) yep ... of_mux_clk_setup is quite talkative ... there are quite some (debug-?) pr_errs in it ;-) Heiko
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote: > Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 22:15:45 schrieb Heiko Stübner: >> Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 22:07:22 schrieb Mike Turquette: >> > Quoting Heiko Stübner (2013-06-03 12:33:19) >> > >> > > Hi Mike, >> > > >> > > I think it's a multiplexEr clock in the patch title, and see below >> > >> > Doh, you are right. But "xor" is so much cooler looking than "xer"... >> > >> > > Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 19:53:09 schrieb Mike Turquette: >> > > > Device Tree binding for the basic clock multiplexor, plus the setup >> > > > function to register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock >> > > > binding. >> > > > >> > > > Also relocate declaration of of_fixed_factor_clk_setup to keep things >> > > > tidy. >> > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> >> > > >> > > [...] >> > > >> > > > + >> > > > + reg = of_iomap(node, 0); >> > > > + pr_err("%s: reg is 0x%p\n", __func__, reg); >> > > > + >> > > > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "mask", &mask)) { >> > > > + pr_err("%s: missing mask property for %s\n", __func__, >> > > > node->name); + return; >> > > > + } >> > > > + >> > > > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "shift", &shift)) >> > > > + pr_debug("%s: missing shift property defaults to zero >> > > > for %s\n", + __func__, node->name); >> > > > + >> > > > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "index_one")) >> > > > + clk_mux_flags |= CLK_MUX_INDEX_ONE; >> > > > + >> > > > + clk = clk_register_mux_table(NULL, clk_name, parent_names, >> > > > num_parents, + 0, reg, 0, mask, clk_mux_flags, >> > > > >> > > ^- should probably be shift >> > > >> > > Otherwise looks cool and I'm currently trying it with my Rockchip code. >> > >> > Right again. My test platform seems to not shift the mask at all so >> > this did not cause a visible bug for me. >> >> I'm currently converting my rockchip stuff to it, as it would solve a lot >> of problems with the numerous clock types I'm defining just to put the >> shift and mask values somewhere. >> >> So lets see if anything more turns up ;-) > > yep ... of_mux_clk_setup is quite talkative ... there are quite some (debug-?) > pr_errs in it ;-) > Yes I realized that after sending. Hopefully not too many curse words in the trace messages. Will remove for v2. Regards, Mike > > Heiko
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/mux-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/mux-clock.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..eda5ba3 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/mux-clock.txt @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +Binding for simple mux clock. + +This binding uses the common clock binding[1]. It assumes a +register-mapped multiplexor with multiple input clock signals or +parents, one of which can be selected as output. This clock does not +gate or adjust the parent rate via a divider or multiplier. + +By default the "clocks" property lists the parents in the same order +as they are programmed into the regster. E.g: + + clocks = <&foo_clock>, <&bar_clock>, <&baz_clock>; + +results in programming the register as follows: + +register value selected parent clock +0 foo_clock +1 bar_clock +2 baz_clock + +Some clock controller IPs do not allow a value of zero to be programmed +into the register, instead indexing begins at 1. The optional property +"index_one" modified the scheme as follows: + +register value selected clock parent +1 foo_clock +2 bar_clock +3 baz_clock + +Additionally an optional table of bit and parent pairs may be supplied +like so: + + table = <&foo_clock 0x0>, <&bar_clock, 0x2>, <&baz_clock, 0x4>; + +where the first value in the pair is the parent clock and the second +value is the bitfield to be programmed into the register. + +The binding must provide the register to control the mux and the mask +for the corresponding control bits. Optionally the number of bits to +shift that mask if necessary. If the shift value is missing it is the +same as supplying a zero shift. + +[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt + +Required properties: +- compatible : shall be "mux-clock". +- #clock-cells : from common clock binding; shall be set to 0. +- clocks : link phandles of parent clocks +- reg : base address for register controlling adjustable mux +- mask : arbitrary bitmask for programming the adjustable mux + +Optional properties: +- clock-output-names : From common clock binding. +- table : array of integer pairs defining parents & bitfield values +- shift : number of bits to shift the mask, defaults to 0 if not present +- index_one : valid input select programming starts at 1, not zero + +Examples: + clock: clock@4a008100 { + compatible = "mux-clock"; + #clock-cells = <0>; + clocks = <&clock_foo>, <&clock_bar>, <&clock_baz>; + reg = <0x4a008100 0x4> + mask = <0x3>; + index_one; + }; + + clock: clock@4a008100 { + #clock-cells = <0>; + compatible = "mux-clock"; + clocks = <&clock_foo>, <&clock_bar>, <&clock_baz>; + reg = <0x4a008100 0x4>; + mask = <0x3>; + shift = <0>; + table = <&clock_foo 1>, <&clock_bar 2>, <&clock_baz 3>; + }; diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c b/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c index 25b1734..8bcbc7c 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ /* * Copyright (C) 2011 Sascha Hauer, Pengutronix <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> * Copyright (C) 2011 Richard Zhao, Linaro <richard.zhao@linaro.org> - * Copyright (C) 2011-2012 Mike Turquette, Linaro Ltd <mturquette@linaro.org> + * Copyright (C) 2011-2013 Mike Turquette, Linaro Ltd <mturquette@linaro.org> * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> /* * DOC: basic adjustable multiplexer clock that cannot gate @@ -153,3 +155,64 @@ struct clk *clk_register_mux(struct device *dev, const char *name, flags, reg, shift, mask, clk_mux_flags, NULL, lock); } + +#ifdef CONFIG_OF +/** + * of_mux_clk_setup() - Setup function for simple mux rate clock + */ +void of_mux_clk_setup(struct device_node *node) +{ + struct clk *clk; + const char *clk_name = node->name; + void __iomem *reg; + int num_parents; + const char **parent_names; + int i; + u8 clk_mux_flags = 0; + u32 mask = 0; + u32 shift = 0; + + of_property_read_string(node, "clock-output-names", &clk_name); + pr_err("%s: clk_name is %s\n", __func__, clk_name); + + num_parents = of_clk_get_parent_count(node); + if (num_parents < 1) { + pr_err("%s: mux-clock %s must have parent(s)\n", + __func__, node->name); + return; + } + pr_err("%s: num_parents is %d\n", __func__, num_parents); + + parent_names = kzalloc((sizeof(char*) * num_parents), + GFP_KERNEL); + + for (i = 0; i < num_parents; i++) { + parent_names[i] = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, i); + pr_err("%s: parent_names[%d] is %s\n", __func__, i, parent_names[i]); + } + + reg = of_iomap(node, 0); + pr_err("%s: reg is 0x%p\n", __func__, reg); + + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "mask", &mask)) { + pr_err("%s: missing mask property for %s\n", __func__, node->name); + return; + } + + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "shift", &shift)) + pr_debug("%s: missing shift property defaults to zero for %s\n", + __func__, node->name); + + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "index_one")) + clk_mux_flags |= CLK_MUX_INDEX_ONE; + + clk = clk_register_mux_table(NULL, clk_name, parent_names, num_parents, + 0, reg, 0, mask, clk_mux_flags, + NULL, NULL); + + if (!IS_ERR(clk)) + of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_mux_clk_setup); +CLK_OF_DECLARE(mux_clk, "mux-clock", of_mux_clk_setup); +#endif diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h index f8d38f2..9c404c2 100644 --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_mux_table(struct device *dev, const char *name, void __iomem *reg, u8 shift, u32 mask, u8 clk_mux_flags, u32 *table, spinlock_t *lock); -void of_fixed_factor_clk_setup(struct device_node *node); +void of_mux_clk_setup(struct device_node *node); /** * struct clk_fixed_factor - fixed multiplier and divider clock @@ -346,10 +346,13 @@ struct clk_fixed_factor { }; extern struct clk_ops clk_fixed_factor_ops; + struct clk *clk_register_fixed_factor(struct device *dev, const char *name, const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags, unsigned int mult, unsigned int div); +void of_fixed_factor_clk_setup(struct device_node *node); + /*** * struct clk_composite - aggregate clock of mux, divider and gate clocks *
Device Tree binding for the basic clock multiplexor, plus the setup function to register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock binding. Also relocate declaration of of_fixed_factor_clk_setup to keep things tidy. Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> --- .../devicetree/bindings/clock/mux-clock.txt | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/clk/clk-mux.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/clk-provider.h | 5 +- 3 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/mux-clock.txt