diff mbox

[2/2] rtc: omap: add rtc wakeup support to alarm events

Message ID 1369982005-8572-3-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Hebbar, Gururaja May 31, 2013, 6:33 a.m. UTC
On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register (RTC_IRQWAKEEN)
is available to enable Wakeup feature for Alarm Events.

Since new platforms/Boards are now added through DT only, this feature
is supported via DT property only.

Platforms using such IP should add the property "ti,has_irq_wake_enb"
in rtc DT node.

Signed-off-by: Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com>
---
:100644 100644 108a629... b870d87... M	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-omap.txt
:100644 100644 000a02f... 5e9c0dd... M	drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-omap.txt |    2 +
 drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c                             |   47 ++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Lad, Prabhakar May 31, 2013, 6:50 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Gururaja,

Thanks for the patch.

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Hebbar Gururaja
<gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> wrote:
> On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register (RTC_IRQWAKEEN)
[snip]
>  - ti,wakeup_capable: Inform the rtc driver that this module is wake-up
>    capable so that rtcwake and suspend tests can work.
> +- ti,has_irq_wake_enb: Inform rtc driver that this module has a a
same comment applies here as well.
s/has a a/ has a

> +  special register to enable Wakeup feature for Alarm events.
>
>  Example:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
> index 000a02f..5e9c0dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@
>  #define OMAP_RTC_KICK0_REG             0x6c
>  #define OMAP_RTC_KICK1_REG             0x70
>
> +#define OMAP_RTC_IRQWAKEEN             0x7C
> +
why not have the hex values in smaller case as done in the rest of the file ?

Regards,
--Prabhakar Lad
Kevin Hilman May 31, 2013, 5:41 p.m. UTC | #2
Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> writes:

> On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register (RTC_IRQWAKEEN)
> is available to enable Wakeup feature for Alarm Events.
>
> Since new platforms/Boards are now added through DT only, this feature
> is supported via DT property only.

> Platforms using such IP should add the property "ti,has_irq_wake_enb"
> in rtc DT node.

This is a property of the IP, not the board.  Can't you detect this
based on the revision of the IP?

Kevin
Hebbar, Gururaja June 4, 2013, 9:39 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 23:11:22, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> writes:
> 
> > On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register (RTC_IRQWAKEEN)
> > is available to enable Wakeup feature for Alarm Events.
> >
> > Since new platforms/Boards are now added through DT only, this feature
> > is supported via DT property only.
> 
> > Platforms using such IP should add the property "ti,has_irq_wake_enb"
> > in rtc DT node.
> 
> This is a property of the IP, not the board.  

Correct.

> Can't you detect this
> based on the revision of the IP?

Will check this and return.

> 
> Kevin
> 


Regards, 
Gururaja
Hebbar, Gururaja June 10, 2013, 11:25 a.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 23:11:22, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> writes:
> 
> > On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register (RTC_IRQWAKEEN)
> > is available to enable Wakeup feature for Alarm Events.
> >
> > Since new platforms/Boards are now added through DT only, this feature
> > is supported via DT property only.
> 
> > Platforms using such IP should add the property "ti,has_irq_wake_enb"
> > in rtc DT node.
> 
> This is a property of the IP, not the board.  Can't you detect this
> based on the revision of the IP?

Here is what I found out till now.

1. rtc-omap driver is used by Davinci, OMAP-1/2 & AM33xx SoC.

2. Only AM33xx soc rtc ip has revision register (& populated). Older OMAP
   Or davinci doesn't have this register.

3. AFAIK, this was the reason why Afzal used platform_device_id & 
   of_device_id->data method to detect new versions (commit
   9e0344dcc225fe1a0e8b8af9ff7df44ec4613580)


So now either 
a. I can follow the same method and add new member to omap_rtc_devtype & add a new compatible in 
 omap_rtc_of_match in rtc-omap.c

or

b. use dt property to indicate existence of above property.


Kindly let me know your opinion about the same.

> 
> Kevin
> 


Regards, 
Gururaja
Hebbar, Gururaja June 13, 2013, 9:39 a.m. UTC | #5
Hi Kevin,

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 16:55:17, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 23:11:22, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> writes:
> > 
> > > On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register (RTC_IRQWAKEEN)
> > > is available to enable Wakeup feature for Alarm Events.
> > >
> > > Since new platforms/Boards are now added through DT only, this feature
> > > is supported via DT property only.
> > 
> > > Platforms using such IP should add the property "ti,has_irq_wake_enb"
> > > in rtc DT node.
> > 
> > This is a property of the IP, not the board.  Can't you detect this
> > based on the revision of the IP?
> 
> Here is what I found out till now.
> 
> 1. rtc-omap driver is used by Davinci, OMAP-1/2 & AM33xx SoC.
> 
> 2. Only AM33xx soc rtc ip has revision register (& populated). Older OMAP
>    Or davinci doesn't have this register.
> 
> 3. AFAIK, this was the reason why Afzal used platform_device_id & 
>    of_device_id->data method to detect new versions (commit
>    9e0344dcc225fe1a0e8b8af9ff7df44ec4613580)
> 
> 
> So now either 
> a. I can follow the same method and add new member to omap_rtc_devtype & add a new compatible in 
>  omap_rtc_of_match in rtc-omap.c
> 
> or
> 
> b. use dt property to indicate existence of above property.
> 
> 
> Kindly let me know your opinion about the same.

Any update on this. I have patch ready for both the choices. Waiting for your ok to send


> 
> > 
> > Kevin
> > 
> 
> 
> Regards, 
> Gururaja
> 


Regards, 
Gururaja
Kevin Hilman June 13, 2013, 10:21 p.m. UTC | #6
"Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> writes:

> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 16:55:17, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 23:11:22, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> > Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> writes:
>> > 
>> > > On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register (RTC_IRQWAKEEN)
>> > > is available to enable Wakeup feature for Alarm Events.
>> > >
>> > > Since new platforms/Boards are now added through DT only, this feature
>> > > is supported via DT property only.
>> > 
>> > > Platforms using such IP should add the property "ti,has_irq_wake_enb"
>> > > in rtc DT node.
>> > 
>> > This is a property of the IP, not the board.  Can't you detect this
>> > based on the revision of the IP?
>> 
>> Here is what I found out till now.
>> 
>> 1. rtc-omap driver is used by Davinci, OMAP-1/2 & AM33xx SoC.
>> 
>> 2. Only AM33xx soc rtc ip has revision register (& populated). Older OMAP
>>    Or davinci doesn't have this register.
>> 
>> 3. AFAIK, this was the reason why Afzal used platform_device_id & 
>>    of_device_id->data method to detect new versions (commit
>>    9e0344dcc225fe1a0e8b8af9ff7df44ec4613580)
>> 
>> 
>> So now either 
>> a. I can follow the same method and add new member to omap_rtc_devtype & add a new compatible in 
>>  omap_rtc_of_match in rtc-omap.c
>> 
>> or
>> 
>> b. use dt property to indicate existence of above property.
>> 
>> 
>> Kindly let me know your opinion about the same.
>
> Any update on this. I have patch ready for both the choices. Waiting for your ok to send

I think (a) is better.

The driver should always do a device_init_wakeup(dev, true), *except*
for devtypes that don't have this feature.

Kevin
Hebbar, Gururaja June 14, 2013, 11:38 a.m. UTC | #7
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:51:43, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> "Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 16:55:17, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 23:11:22, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> > Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> writes:
> >> > 
> >> > > On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register (RTC_IRQWAKEEN)
> >> > > is available to enable Wakeup feature for Alarm Events.
> >> > >
> >> > > Since new platforms/Boards are now added through DT only, this feature
> >> > > is supported via DT property only.
> >> > 
> >> > > Platforms using such IP should add the property "ti,has_irq_wake_enb"
> >> > > in rtc DT node.
> >> > 
> >> > This is a property of the IP, not the board.  Can't you detect this
> >> > based on the revision of the IP?
> >> 
> >> Here is what I found out till now.
> >> 
> >> 1. rtc-omap driver is used by Davinci, OMAP-1/2 & AM33xx SoC.
> >> 
> >> 2. Only AM33xx soc rtc ip has revision register (& populated). Older OMAP
> >>    Or davinci doesn't have this register.
> >> 
> >> 3. AFAIK, this was the reason why Afzal used platform_device_id & 
> >>    of_device_id->data method to detect new versions (commit
> >>    9e0344dcc225fe1a0e8b8af9ff7df44ec4613580)
> >> 
> >> 
> >> So now either 
> >> a. I can follow the same method and add new member to omap_rtc_devtype & add a new compatible in 
> >>  omap_rtc_of_match in rtc-omap.c
> >> 
> >> or
> >> 
> >> b. use dt property to indicate existence of above property.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Kindly let me know your opinion about the same.
> >
> > Any update on this. I have patch ready for both the choices. Waiting for your ok to send
> 
> I think (a) is better.

Ok. I will add the property using a new DT compatibility.


> 
> The driver should always do a device_init_wakeup(dev, true), *except*
> for devtypes that don't have this feature.

"wakeup capable" and "irq-wake-enable-for-alarm-event" are different

For "irq-wake-enable-for-alarm-event", I will add a new DT compability.

However, wakeup capable notification is done in another patch using the a 
DT property "ti,wakeup_capable".

The reason for using a dt property is specified below


	commit fa5b07820fe3a0fc06ac368516e71f10a59b9539
	Author: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
	Date:   Wed Oct 27 15:33:05 2010 -0700

	rtc: omap: let device wakeup capability be configured from chip
	init logic

	The rtc-omap driver currently hardcodes the RTC wakeup
	capability to be "not capable".  While this seems to be true for
	existing OMAP1 boards which are not wired for this, the
	DA850/OMAP-L138 SoC, the RTC can always be wake up source from
	its "deep sleep" mode.


So I cannot directly add device_init_wakeup(dev, true), inside driver code.
So, I added a DT property




> 
> Kevin
> 
> 


Regards, 
Gururaja
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-omap.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-omap.txt
index 108a629..b870d87 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-omap.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-omap.txt
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@  Required properties:
 Optional properties:
 - ti,wakeup_capable: Inform the rtc driver that this module is wake-up
   capable so that rtcwake and suspend tests can work.
+- ti,has_irq_wake_enb: Inform rtc driver that this module has a a
+  special register to enable Wakeup feature for Alarm events.
 
 Example:
 
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
index 000a02f..5e9c0dd 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ 
 #define OMAP_RTC_KICK0_REG		0x6c
 #define OMAP_RTC_KICK1_REG		0x70
 
+#define OMAP_RTC_IRQWAKEEN		0x7C
+
 /* OMAP_RTC_CTRL_REG bit fields: */
 #define OMAP_RTC_CTRL_SPLIT		(1<<7)
 #define OMAP_RTC_CTRL_DISABLE		(1<<6)
@@ -96,6 +98,9 @@ 
 #define OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_ALARM    (1<<3)
 #define OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_TIMER    (1<<2)
 
+/* OMAP_RTC_IRQWAKEEN bit fields: */
+#define OMAP_RTC_IRQWAKEEN_ALARM_WAKEEN    (1<<1)
+
 /* OMAP_RTC_KICKER values */
 #define	KICK0_VALUE			0x83e70b13
 #define	KICK1_VALUE			0x95a4f1e0
@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ 
 #define	OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER		0x1
 
 static void __iomem	*rtc_base;
+static unsigned int	has_irq_wake_enb_bit;
 
 #define rtc_read(addr)		readb(rtc_base + (addr))
 #define rtc_write(val, addr)	writeb(val, rtc_base + (addr))
@@ -425,9 +431,14 @@  static int __init omap_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	/* Fixup wakeup-enable feature based on the device tree */
 	if (of_id && of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node,
-				      "ti,wakeup_capable", NULL))
+				      "ti,wakeup_capable", NULL)) {
 		device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
 
+		if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node,
+				     "ti,has_irq_wake_enb", NULL))
+			has_irq_wake_enb_bit = true;
+	}
+
 	if (new_ctrl & (u8) OMAP_RTC_CTRL_SPLIT)
 		pr_info("%s: split power mode\n", pdev->name);
 
@@ -469,16 +480,26 @@  static u8 irqstat;
 
 static int omap_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
+	u8 irqwake_stat;
+
 	irqstat = rtc_read(OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG);
 
-	/* FIXME the RTC alarm is not currently acting as a wakeup event
-	 * source, and in fact this enable() call is just saving a flag
-	 * that's never used...
+	/*
+	 * FIXME. On some platforms the RTC alarm is not currently acting as a
+	 * wakeup event source, and in fact this enable() call is just saving a
+	 * flag that's never used...
 	 */
-	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
+	if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
 		enable_irq_wake(omap_rtc_alarm);
-	else
+
+		if (has_irq_wake_enb_bit == true) {
+			irqwake_stat = rtc_read(OMAP_RTC_IRQWAKEEN);
+			irqwake_stat |= OMAP_RTC_IRQWAKEEN_ALARM_WAKEEN;
+			rtc_write(irqwake_stat, OMAP_RTC_IRQWAKEEN);
+		}
+	} else {
 		rtc_write(0, OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG);
+	}
 
 	/* Disable the clock/module */
 	pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
@@ -488,13 +509,23 @@  static int omap_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
 
 static int omap_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
+	u8 irqwake_stat;
+
 	/* Enable the clock/module so that we can access the registers */
 	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
 
-	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
+	if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
 		disable_irq_wake(omap_rtc_alarm);
-	else
+
+		if (has_irq_wake_enb_bit == true) {
+			irqwake_stat = rtc_read(OMAP_RTC_IRQWAKEEN);
+			irqwake_stat &= ~OMAP_RTC_IRQWAKEEN_ALARM_WAKEEN;
+			rtc_write(irqwake_stat, OMAP_RTC_IRQWAKEEN);
+		}
+	} else {
 		rtc_write(irqstat, OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif