Message ID | 1372170171-9561-7-git-send-email-detheridge@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 25/06/13 17:22, Darren Etheridge wrote: > From: Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com> > > store lcd clk rate always, i.e. irrespective of whether CPUFREQ is > enabled or not. This can be used to get clk rate directly instead of > enquiring with clock framework with clk handle every time. > > Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Darren Etheridge <detheridge@ti.com> > --- > drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c | 4 +--- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c b/drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c > index d060f14..f1d88ac 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c > +++ b/drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c > @@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ struct da8xx_fb_par { > unsigned int which_dma_channel_done; > #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ > struct notifier_block freq_transition; > - unsigned int lcd_fck_rate; > #endif > + unsigned int lcd_fck_rate; The naming related to this clock is quite confusing. There's lcd_fck_rate, fb_clk and lcdc_clk, all of which refer to the same clock as far as I understand. Tomi
diff --git a/drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c b/drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c index d060f14..f1d88ac 100644 --- a/drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c +++ b/drivers/video/da8xx-fb.c @@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ struct da8xx_fb_par { unsigned int which_dma_channel_done; #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ struct notifier_block freq_transition; - unsigned int lcd_fck_rate; #endif + unsigned int lcd_fck_rate; void (*panel_power_ctrl)(int); u32 pseudo_palette[16]; struct fb_videomode mode; @@ -1302,9 +1302,7 @@ static int fb_probe(struct platform_device *device) par = da8xx_fb_info->par; par->lcdc_clk = fb_clk; -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ par->lcd_fck_rate = clk_get_rate(fb_clk); -#endif par->pxl_clk = lcdc_info->pixclock; if (fb_pdata->panel_power_ctrl) { par->panel_power_ctrl = fb_pdata->panel_power_ctrl;