Message ID | CAPgLHd_RTeUgZtsLd=GqW7tG0q-ccDcd8gBNgDxo3E8qLE141g@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Wei, On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 08:17:45PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote: > From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn> > > In case of error, the function clk_register_composite() and > clk_register_factors() returns ERR_PTR() not NULL. The NULL test > in the return value check should be replaced with IS_ERR(). > > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn> Thanks for this patch, but Axel Lin already sent a equivalent patch for this issue last week: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-July/183138.html Maxime
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c index 412912b..02e440b 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void __init sunxi_osc_clk_setup(struct device_node *node) &gate->hw, &clk_gate_ops, CLK_IS_ROOT); - if (clk) { + if (!IS_ERR(clk)) { of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk); clk_register_clkdev(clk, clk_name, NULL); } @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static void __init sunxi_factors_clk_setup(struct device_node *node, clk = clk_register_factors(NULL, clk_name, parent, 0, reg, data->table, data->getter, &clk_lock); - if (clk) { + if (!IS_ERR(clk)) { of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk); clk_register_clkdev(clk, clk_name, NULL); }