diff mbox

[07/22] ARM: exynos: Remove '0x's from Exynos4110 DTSI file

Message ID 1374490361-25769-7-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Lee Jones July 22, 2013, 10:52 a.m. UTC
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Tomasz Figa July 22, 2013, 7:25 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Lee,

On Monday 22 of July 2013 11:52:26 Lee Jones wrote:
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi index b7f358a..53e2527 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
>  		};
>  	};
> 
> -	clock: clock-controller@0x10030000 {
> +	clock: clock-controller@10030000 {
>  		compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-clock";
>  		reg = <0x10030000 0x20000>;
>  		#clock-cells = <1>;

This looks fine, but please fix commit message - it should be Exynos4210. 
Also some explanation why this change is needed would be good, even if 
it's obvious.

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Lee Jones July 23, 2013, 8:55 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> On Monday 22 of July 2013 11:52:26 Lee Jones wrote:
> > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi index b7f358a..53e2527 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
> >  		};
> >  	};
> > 
> > -	clock: clock-controller@0x10030000 {
> > +	clock: clock-controller@10030000 {
> >  		compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-clock";
> >  		reg = <0x10030000 0x20000>;
> >  		#clock-cells = <1>;
> 
> This looks fine, but please fix commit message - it should be Exynos4210. 
> Also some explanation why this change is needed would be good, even if 
> it's obvious.

Hi Tomasz,

I'm happy to fixup the $SUBJECT line, but do we really have to enter
an explanation if it's obvious? Seems a little belt and braces.

Kind regards,
Lee
Tomasz Figa July 23, 2013, 9:32 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tuesday 23 of July 2013 09:55:52 Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Hi Lee,
> > 
> > On Monday 22 of July 2013 11:52:26 Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> > > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi index b7f358a..53e2527 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
> > > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
> > > 
> > >  		};
> > >  	
> > >  	};
> > > 
> > > -	clock: clock-controller@0x10030000 {
> > > +	clock: clock-controller@10030000 {
> > > 
> > >  		compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-clock";
> > >  		reg = <0x10030000 0x20000>;
> > >  		#clock-cells = <1>;
> > 
> > This looks fine, but please fix commit message - it should be
> > Exynos4210. Also some explanation why this change is needed would be
> > good, even if it's obvious.
> 
> Hi Tomasz,
> 
> I'm happy to fixup the $SUBJECT line, but do we really have to enter
> an explanation if it's obvious? Seems a little belt and braces.

It's obvious for us, people working with device tree, but for people that 
usually don't it might not be.

Something among following lines would be fine:

This patch removes "0x" prefix from addresses in DT nodes for the sake of 
consistency with other nodes and assumed convention.

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
index b7f358a..53e2527 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ 
 		};
 	};
 
-	clock: clock-controller@0x10030000 {
+	clock: clock-controller@10030000 {
 		compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-clock";
 		reg = <0x10030000 0x20000>;
 		#clock-cells = <1>;