[4/4] ARM: set --be8 when linking modules

Commit Message

Ben Dooks July 22, 2013, 6:56 p.m. UTC

On 22/07/13 19:53, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Ben Dooks wrote:
>
>> On 22/07/13 18:05, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 07/22, Ben Dooks wrote:
>>>> To avoid having to make every text section swap the instruction order
>>>> of all instructions, make sure modules are built also built with --be8
>>>> (as is the current kernel final link).
>>>>
>>>> If we do not do this, we would end up having to swap all instructions
>>>> when loading a module, instead of just the instructions that we are
>>>> applying ELF relocations to.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If someone tries to load a be8 module on a non-be8 kernel will it
>>> still work? Or should we add an extra version magic string in
>>> asm/module.h to prevent that?
>>
>> The ELF header changes the EI_DATA field in the ei_ident from
>> ELFDATA2LSB to ELFDATA2MSB when compiling so we should be able
>> to detect these when loading.
>>
>> I have not checked to see if the kernel correctly checks for this.
>>
>> I do not think it currently checks the ei_flags field for the
>> EF_ARM_BE8 in ABI 4 and 5. I am not sure if this is really important?
>
> If the information is already there and easily accessible, then it
> should be used.
>
>
> Nicolas

I have something like this, it does not mess things up loading
BE8 binaries on my current system. I think we're building stuff
for EABI4 but haven't checked.

Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius

Comments

Ben Dooks July 23, 2013, 8:16 a.m. UTC | #1

On 22/07/13 19:56, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 22/07/13 19:53, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Ben Dooks wrote:
>>
>>> On 22/07/13 18:05, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> On 07/22, Ben Dooks wrote:
>>>>> To avoid having to make every text section swap the instruction order
>>>>> of all instructions, make sure modules are built also built with --be8
>>>>> (as is the current kernel final link).
>>>>>
>>>>> If we do not do this, we would end up having to swap all instructions
>>>>> when loading a module, instead of just the instructions that we are
>>>>> applying ELF relocations to.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If someone tries to load a be8 module on a non-be8 kernel will it
>>>> still work? Or should we add an extra version magic string in
>>>> asm/module.h to prevent that?
>>>
>>> The ELF header changes the EI_DATA field in the ei_ident from
>>> ELFDATA2LSB to ELFDATA2MSB when compiling so we should be able
>>> to detect these when loading.
>>>
>>> I have not checked to see if the kernel correctly checks for this.
>>>
>>> I do not think it currently checks the ei_flags field for the
>>> EF_ARM_BE8 in ABI 4 and 5. I am not sure if this is really important?
>>
>> If the information is already there and easily accessible, then it
>> should be used.
>>
>>
>> Nicolas
>
> I have something like this, it does not mess things up loading
> BE8 binaries on my current system. I think we're building stuff
> for EABI4 but haven't checked.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/elf.c b/arch/arm/kernel/elf.c
> index d0d1e83..3b0351c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/elf.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/elf.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,15 @@ int elf_check_arch(const struct elf32_hdr *x)
> if (flt_fmt == EF_ARM_VFP_FLOAT && !(elf_hwcap & HWCAP_VFP))
> return 0;
> }
> +
> + if ((eflags & EF_ARM_EABI_MASK) >= EF_ARM_EABI_VER4) {
> + if (eflags & EF_ARM_BE8) {
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_CPU_BE8))
> + return 1;
> + } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_CPU_BE8))
> + return 1;
> + }

dis-regard this, it does not work. I blame the heat.

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/elf.c b/arch/arm/kernel/elf.c
index d0d1e83..3b0351c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/elf.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/elf.c
@@ -34,6 +34,15 @@  int elf_check_arch(const struct elf32_hdr *x)
                 if (flt_fmt == EF_ARM_VFP_FLOAT && !(elf_hwcap & 
HWCAP_VFP))
                         return 0;
         }
+
+       if ((eflags & EF_ARM_EABI_MASK) >= EF_ARM_EABI_VER4) {
+               if (eflags & EF_ARM_BE8) {
+                       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_CPU_BE8))
+                               return 1;
+               } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_CPU_BE8))
+                       return 1;
+       }
+

-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/