diff mbox

[2/6] mtd: atmel_nand: replace pmecc enable code with one function.

Message ID 1375701279-11495-3-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Josh Wu Aug. 5, 2013, 11:14 a.m. UTC 
Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
---
v4 --> v5:
  add blank line after variable declaration.

 drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Brian Norris Aug. 7, 2013, 7:20 a.m. UTC | #1 
Hi Josh,

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 07:14:34PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> index 3d7db95..28d159a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> @@ -746,6 +746,30 @@ normal_check:
>  	return total_err;
>  }
>  
> +static void pmecc_enable(struct atmel_nand_host *host, int ecc_op)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_RST);
> +	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DISABLE);
> +	val = pmecc_readl_relaxed(host->ecc, CFG);
> +
> +	if (ecc_op != NAND_ECC_READ && ecc_op != NAND_ECC_WRITE) {
> +		dev_err(host->dev, "atmel_nand: wrong pmecc operation type!");
> +		return;
> +	}

Why is this check after the reset and disable? Shouldn't it be placed at
the beginning of the function? But this is a somewhat strange check
anyway, since this function is private to the driver (static).

> +
> +	if (ecc_op == NAND_ECC_READ)
> +		pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CFG, (val & ~PMECC_CFG_WRITE_OP)
> +			| PMECC_CFG_AUTO_ENABLE);
> +	else
> +		pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CFG, (val | PMECC_CFG_WRITE_OP)
> +			& ~PMECC_CFG_AUTO_ENABLE);
> +
> +	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_ENABLE);
> +	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DATA);
> +}
> +
>  static int atmel_nand_pmecc_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>  	struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page)
>  {

Brian
Josh Wu Aug. 7, 2013, 9:20 a.m. UTC | #2 
Hi, Brian

On 8/7/2013 3:20 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 07:14:34PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
>> index 3d7db95..28d159a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
>> @@ -746,6 +746,30 @@ normal_check:
>>   	return total_err;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void pmecc_enable(struct atmel_nand_host *host, int ecc_op)
>> +{
>> +	u32 val;
>> +
>> +	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_RST);
>> +	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DISABLE);
>> +	val = pmecc_readl_relaxed(host->ecc, CFG);
>> +
>> +	if (ecc_op != NAND_ECC_READ && ecc_op != NAND_ECC_WRITE) {
>> +		dev_err(host->dev, "atmel_nand: wrong pmecc operation type!");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
> Why is this check after the reset and disable? Shouldn't it be placed at
> the beginning of the function? But this is a somewhat strange check
> anyway, since this function is private to the driver (static).

yes, you are right, this check code should put in the beginning of the 
function.

I will send out a patch in the top of the l2-mtd.git soon. thanks

>
>> +
>> +	if (ecc_op == NAND_ECC_READ)
>> +		pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CFG, (val & ~PMECC_CFG_WRITE_OP)
>> +			| PMECC_CFG_AUTO_ENABLE);
>> +	else
>> +		pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CFG, (val | PMECC_CFG_WRITE_OP)
>> +			& ~PMECC_CFG_AUTO_ENABLE);
>> +
>> +	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_ENABLE);
>> +	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DATA);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int atmel_nand_pmecc_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>>   	struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page)
>>   {
> Brian
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
index 3d7db95..28d159a 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
@@ -746,6 +746,30 @@  normal_check:
 	return total_err;
 }
 
+static void pmecc_enable(struct atmel_nand_host *host, int ecc_op)
+{
+	u32 val;
+
+	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_RST);
+	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DISABLE);
+	val = pmecc_readl_relaxed(host->ecc, CFG);
+
+	if (ecc_op != NAND_ECC_READ && ecc_op != NAND_ECC_WRITE) {
+		dev_err(host->dev, "atmel_nand: wrong pmecc operation type!");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (ecc_op == NAND_ECC_READ)
+		pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CFG, (val & ~PMECC_CFG_WRITE_OP)
+			| PMECC_CFG_AUTO_ENABLE);
+	else
+		pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CFG, (val | PMECC_CFG_WRITE_OP)
+			& ~PMECC_CFG_AUTO_ENABLE);
+
+	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_ENABLE);
+	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DATA);
+}
+
 static int atmel_nand_pmecc_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
 	struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page)
 {
@@ -757,13 +781,7 @@  static int atmel_nand_pmecc_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
 	unsigned long end_time;
 	int bitflips = 0;
 
-	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_RST);
-	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DISABLE);
-	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CFG, (pmecc_readl_relaxed(host->ecc, CFG)
-		& ~PMECC_CFG_WRITE_OP) | PMECC_CFG_AUTO_ENABLE);
-
-	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_ENABLE);
-	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DATA);
+	pmecc_enable(host, NAND_ECC_READ);
 
 	chip->read_buf(mtd, buf, eccsize);
 	chip->read_buf(mtd, oob, mtd->oobsize);
@@ -796,14 +814,7 @@  static int atmel_nand_pmecc_write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
 	int i, j;
 	unsigned long end_time;
 
-	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_RST);
-	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DISABLE);
-
-	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CFG, (pmecc_readl_relaxed(host->ecc, CFG) |
-		PMECC_CFG_WRITE_OP) & ~PMECC_CFG_AUTO_ENABLE);
-
-	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_ENABLE);
-	pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DATA);
+	pmecc_enable(host, NAND_ECC_WRITE);
 
 	chip->write_buf(mtd, (u8 *)buf, mtd->writesize);