diff mbox

[PATCHv2,1/5] drm/exynos: add device tree support for rotator

Message ID 1376034053-31910-2-git-send-email-chanho61.park@samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Chanho Park Aug. 9, 2013, 7:40 a.m. UTC
The exynos4 platform is only dt-based since 3.10, we should convert driver data
and ids to dt-based parsing methods. The rotator driver has a limit table to get
size limit of input picture. Each SoCs has slightly different limit value
compared with any others.
For example, exynos4210's max_size of RGB888 is 16k x 16k. But, others have
8k x 8k. Another example the exynos5250 should have multiple of 2 pixel size
for its X/Y axis. Thus, we should keep different tables for each of them.

Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_rotator.c |  109 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

Comments

Sachin Kamat Aug. 9, 2013, 9:48 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Chanho,

On 9 August 2013 13:10, Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com> wrote:
> The exynos4 platform is only dt-based since 3.10, we should convert driver data
> and ids to dt-based parsing methods. The rotator driver has a limit table to get
> size limit of input picture. Each SoCs has slightly different limit value
> compared with any others.
> For example, exynos4210's max_size of RGB888 is 16k x 16k. But, others have
> 8k x 8k. Another example the exynos5250 should have multiple of 2 pixel size
> for its X/Y axis. Thus, we should keep different tables for each of them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_rotator.c |  109 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
[snip]
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id exynos_rotator_match[] = {
> +       {
> +               .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-rotator",
> +               .data = &rot_limit_tbl_4210,
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-rotator",
> +               .data = &rot_limit_tbl_4x12,
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-rotator",
> +               .data = &rot_limit_tbl_5250,
> +       },
> +       {},
> +};
> +
>  static int rotator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -645,8 +712,19 @@ static int rotator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>         }
>
> -       rot->limit_tbl = (struct rot_limit_table *)
> -                               platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> +       if (dev->of_node) {
> +               const struct of_device_id *match;
> +               match = of_match_node(of_match_ptr(exynos_rotator_match),

of_match_ptr is not needed since exynos_rotator_match is always compiled in.

[snip]
> -static struct platform_device_id rotator_driver_ids[] = {
> -       {
> -               .name           = "exynos-rot",
> -               .driver_data    = (unsigned long)&rot_limit_tbl,
> -       },
> -       {},
> -};
> -
>  static int rotator_clk_crtl(struct rot_context *rot, bool enable)
>  {
>         if (enable) {
> @@ -804,10 +857,10 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops rotator_pm_ops = {
>  struct platform_driver rotator_driver = {
>         .probe          = rotator_probe,
>         .remove         = rotator_remove,
> -       .id_table       = rotator_driver_ids,
>         .driver         = {
>                 .name   = "exynos-rot",
>                 .owner  = THIS_MODULE,
>                 .pm     = &rotator_pm_ops,
> +               .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(exynos_rotator_match),

ditto
Chanho Park Aug. 12, 2013, 2:48 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Tomasz,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:t.figa@samsung.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 9:51 PM
> To: Chanho Park
> Cc: inki.dae@samsung.com; kgene.kim@samsung.com; dri-
> devel@lists.freedesktop.org; kyungmin.park@samsung.com;
> mark.rutland@arm.com; l.stach@pengutronix.de; s.nawrocki@samsung.com;
> tomasz.figa@gmail.com; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/5] drm/exynos: add device tree support for
> rotator
> 
> Hi Chanho,
> 
> On Friday 09 of August 2013 16:40:49 Chanho Park wrote:
> > The exynos4 platform is only dt-based since 3.10, we should convert
> > driver data and ids to dt-based parsing methods. The rotator driver
> > has a limit table to get size limit of input picture. Each SoCs has
> > slightly different limit value compared with any others.
> > For example, exynos4210's max_size of RGB888 is 16k x 16k. But, others
> > have 8k x 8k. Another example the exynos5250 should have multiple of 2
> > pixel size for its X/Y axis. Thus, we should keep different tables for
> > each of them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_rotator.c |  109
> > ++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 28
> > deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_rotator.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_rotator.c index 427640a..39b09e0
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_rotator.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_rotator.c
> > @@ -632,6 +632,73 @@ static int rotator_ippdrv_start(struct device
> > *dev, enum drm_exynos_ipp_cmd cmd) return 0;  }
> >
> > +static struct rot_limit_table rot_limit_tbl_4210 = {
> > +	.ycbcr420_2p = {
> > +		.min_w = 32,
> > +		.min_h = 32,
> > +		.max_w = SZ_64K,
> > +		.max_h = SZ_64K,
> > +		.align = 3,
> > +	},
> > +	.rgb888 = {
> > +		.min_w = 8,
> > +		.min_h = 8,
> > +		.max_w = SZ_16K,
> > +		.max_h = SZ_16K,
> > +		.align = 2,
> > +	},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct rot_limit_table rot_limit_tbl_4x12 = {
> > +	.ycbcr420_2p = {
> > +		.min_w = 32,
> > +		.min_h = 32,
> > +		.max_w = SZ_32K,
> > +		.max_h = SZ_32K,
> > +		.align = 3,
> > +	},
> > +	.rgb888 = {
> > +		.min_w = 8,
> > +		.min_h = 8,
> > +		.max_w = SZ_8K,
> > +		.max_h = SZ_8K,
> > +		.align = 2,
> > +	},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct rot_limit_table rot_limit_tbl_5250 = {
> > +	.ycbcr420_2p = {
> > +		.min_w = 32,
> > +		.min_h = 32,
> > +		.max_w = SZ_32K,
> > +		.max_h = SZ_32K,
> > +		.align = 3,
> > +	},
> > +	.rgb888 = {
> > +		.min_w = 8,
> > +		.min_h = 8,
> > +		.max_w = SZ_8K,
> > +		.max_h = SZ_8K,
> > +		.align = 1,
> > +	},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id exynos_rotator_match[] = {
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-rotator",
> > +		.data = &rot_limit_tbl_4210,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-rotator",
> > +		.data = &rot_limit_tbl_4x12,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-rotator",
> > +		.data = &rot_limit_tbl_5250,
> > +	},
> > +	{},
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int rotator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -645,8 +712,19 @@ static int rotator_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev) return -ENOMEM;
> >  	}
> >
> > -	rot->limit_tbl = (struct rot_limit_table *)
> > -				platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> > +	if (dev->of_node) {
> > +		const struct of_device_id *match;
> > +		match = of_match_node(of_match_ptr(exynos_rotator_match),
> > +					dev->of_node);
> > +		if (match == NULL) {
> > +			dev_err(dev, "failed to match node\n");
> > +			return -ENODEV;
> > +		}
> > +		rot->limit_tbl = (struct rot_limit_table *)match->data;
> > +	} else {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "cannot find binding\n");
> 
> What about having a check for !dev->of_node at the beginning of probe,
> to not complicate further code?

I agree with your comment. I'll move it at the beginning.

> 
> Also the error message is confusing. It should be something closer to
> "device does not have of_node".

I'll change it to avoid confusing. Thanks.

> 
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> >
> >  	rot->regs_res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >  	rot->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, rot->regs_res); @@ -718,31
> > +796,6 @@ static int rotator_remove(struct platform_device
> > *pdev) return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static struct rot_limit_table rot_limit_tbl = {
> > -	.ycbcr420_2p = {
> > -		.min_w = 32,
> > -		.min_h = 32,
> > -		.max_w = SZ_32K,
> > -		.max_h = SZ_32K,
> > -		.align = 3,
> > -	},
> > -	.rgb888 = {
> > -		.min_w = 8,
> > -		.min_h = 8,
> > -		.max_w = SZ_8K,
> > -		.max_h = SZ_8K,
> > -		.align = 2,
> > -	},
> > -};
> > -
> > -static struct platform_device_id rotator_driver_ids[] = {
> > -	{
> > -		.name		= "exynos-rot",
> > -		.driver_data	= (unsigned long)&rot_limit_tbl,
> > -	},
> > -	{},
> > -};
> > -
> >  static int rotator_clk_crtl(struct rot_context *rot, bool enable)  {
> >  	if (enable) {
> > @@ -804,10 +857,10 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops rotator_pm_ops =
> > {  struct platform_driver rotator_driver = {
> >  	.probe		= rotator_probe,
> >  	.remove		= rotator_remove,
> > -	.id_table	= rotator_driver_ids,
> >  	.driver		= {
> >  		.name	= "exynos-rot",
> >  		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
> >  		.pm	= &rotator_pm_ops,
> > +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(exynos_rotator_match),
> >  	},
> >  };
> 
> Otherwise looks fine.
> 
> One more thing is that IMHO patch 5/5 could be squashed with this one,
> so documentation for the binding would be available at the same it is
> introduced.

Yes. it seems to be better consolidating patch1 and 5.
I'll apply it to next patch.
Thanks.

> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_rotator.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_rotator.c
index 427640a..39b09e0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_rotator.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_rotator.c
@@ -632,6 +632,73 @@  static int rotator_ippdrv_start(struct device *dev, enum drm_exynos_ipp_cmd cmd)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static struct rot_limit_table rot_limit_tbl_4210 = {
+	.ycbcr420_2p = {
+		.min_w = 32,
+		.min_h = 32,
+		.max_w = SZ_64K,
+		.max_h = SZ_64K,
+		.align = 3,
+	},
+	.rgb888 = {
+		.min_w = 8,
+		.min_h = 8,
+		.max_w = SZ_16K,
+		.max_h = SZ_16K,
+		.align = 2,
+	},
+};
+
+static struct rot_limit_table rot_limit_tbl_4x12 = {
+	.ycbcr420_2p = {
+		.min_w = 32,
+		.min_h = 32,
+		.max_w = SZ_32K,
+		.max_h = SZ_32K,
+		.align = 3,
+	},
+	.rgb888 = {
+		.min_w = 8,
+		.min_h = 8,
+		.max_w = SZ_8K,
+		.max_h = SZ_8K,
+		.align = 2,
+	},
+};
+
+static struct rot_limit_table rot_limit_tbl_5250 = {
+	.ycbcr420_2p = {
+		.min_w = 32,
+		.min_h = 32,
+		.max_w = SZ_32K,
+		.max_h = SZ_32K,
+		.align = 3,
+	},
+	.rgb888 = {
+		.min_w = 8,
+		.min_h = 8,
+		.max_w = SZ_8K,
+		.max_h = SZ_8K,
+		.align = 1,
+	},
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id exynos_rotator_match[] = {
+	{
+		.compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-rotator",
+		.data = &rot_limit_tbl_4210,
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-rotator",
+		.data = &rot_limit_tbl_4x12,
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-rotator",
+		.data = &rot_limit_tbl_5250,
+	},
+	{},
+};
+
 static int rotator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -645,8 +712,19 @@  static int rotator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	rot->limit_tbl = (struct rot_limit_table *)
-				platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
+	if (dev->of_node) {
+		const struct of_device_id *match;
+		match = of_match_node(of_match_ptr(exynos_rotator_match),
+					dev->of_node);
+		if (match == NULL) {
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to match node\n");
+			return -ENODEV;
+		}
+		rot->limit_tbl = (struct rot_limit_table *)match->data;
+	} else {
+		dev_err(dev, "cannot find binding\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
 
 	rot->regs_res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 	rot->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, rot->regs_res);
@@ -718,31 +796,6 @@  static int rotator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct rot_limit_table rot_limit_tbl = {
-	.ycbcr420_2p = {
-		.min_w = 32,
-		.min_h = 32,
-		.max_w = SZ_32K,
-		.max_h = SZ_32K,
-		.align = 3,
-	},
-	.rgb888 = {
-		.min_w = 8,
-		.min_h = 8,
-		.max_w = SZ_8K,
-		.max_h = SZ_8K,
-		.align = 2,
-	},
-};
-
-static struct platform_device_id rotator_driver_ids[] = {
-	{
-		.name		= "exynos-rot",
-		.driver_data	= (unsigned long)&rot_limit_tbl,
-	},
-	{},
-};
-
 static int rotator_clk_crtl(struct rot_context *rot, bool enable)
 {
 	if (enable) {
@@ -804,10 +857,10 @@  static const struct dev_pm_ops rotator_pm_ops = {
 struct platform_driver rotator_driver = {
 	.probe		= rotator_probe,
 	.remove		= rotator_remove,
-	.id_table	= rotator_driver_ids,
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "exynos-rot",
 		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
 		.pm	= &rotator_pm_ops,
+		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(exynos_rotator_match),
 	},
 };