| Message ID | 1376991021-12160-4-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 20/08/13 13:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 10:30:05 AM Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> >> >> Currently different drivers requiring to access cpu device node are >> parsing the device tree themselves. Since the ordering in the DT need >> not match the logical cpu ordering, the parsing logic needs to consider >> that. However, this has resulted in lots of code duplication and in some >> cases even incorrect logic. >> >> It's better to consolidate them by adding support for getting cpu >> device node for a given logical cpu index in DT core library. However >> logical to physical index mapping can be architecture specific. >> >> PowerPC has it's own implementation to get the cpu node for a given >> logical index. >> >> This patch refactors the current implementation of of_get_cpu_node. >> This in preparation to move the implementation to DT core library. >> It separates out the logical to physical mapping so that a default >> matching of the physical id to the logical cpu index can be added >> when moved to common code. Architecture specific code can override it. >> >> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> >> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> >> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> >> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> > > This needs an ACK from Ben to go anywhere. > Hi Rafael, Correct, he has reviewed but I am waiting for his ACK before I could sent you pull request. Hopefully I should be able to send pull request tomorrow with his ACK. Hi Ben, If this is patch is fine, can I have your ACK ? Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 10:30:05 AM Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: > From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> > > Currently different drivers requiring to access cpu device node are > parsing the device tree themselves. Since the ordering in the DT need > not match the logical cpu ordering, the parsing logic needs to consider > that. However, this has resulted in lots of code duplication and in some > cases even incorrect logic. > > It's better to consolidate them by adding support for getting cpu > device node for a given logical cpu index in DT core library. However > logical to physical index mapping can be architecture specific. > > PowerPC has it's own implementation to get the cpu node for a given > logical index. > > This patch refactors the current implementation of of_get_cpu_node. > This in preparation to move the implementation to DT core library. > It separates out the logical to physical mapping so that a default > matching of the physical id to the logical cpu index can be added > when moved to common code. Architecture specific code can override it. > > Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> This needs an ACK from Ben to go anywhere. Thanks, Rafael > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c > index eb23ac9..f7b8c0b 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c > @@ -865,45 +865,63 @@ static int __init prom_reconfig_setup(void) > __initcall(prom_reconfig_setup); > #endif > > +bool arch_match_cpu_phys_id(int cpu, u64 phys_id) > +{ > + return (int)phys_id == get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu); > +} > + > +static bool __of_find_n_match_cpu_property(struct device_node *cpun, > + const char *prop_name, int cpu, unsigned int *thread) > +{ > + const __be32 *cell; > + int ac, prop_len, tid; > + u64 hwid; > + > + ac = of_n_addr_cells(cpun); > + cell = of_get_property(cpun, prop_name, &prop_len); > + if (!cell) > + return false; > + prop_len /= sizeof(*cell); > + for (tid = 0; tid < prop_len; tid++) { > + hwid = of_read_number(cell, ac); > + if (arch_match_cpu_phys_id(cpu, hwid)) { > + if (thread) > + *thread = tid; > + return true; > + } > + cell += ac; > + } > + return false; > +} > + > /* Find the device node for a given logical cpu number, also returns the cpu > * local thread number (index in ibm,interrupt-server#s) if relevant and > * asked for (non NULL) > */ > struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int *thread) > { > - int hardid; > - struct device_node *np; > + struct device_node *cpun, *cpus; > > - hardid = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu); > + cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus"); > + if (!cpus) { > + pr_warn("Missing cpus node, bailing out\n"); > + return NULL; > + } > > - for_each_node_by_type(np, "cpu") { > - const u32 *intserv; > - unsigned int plen, t; > + for_each_child_of_node(cpus, cpun) { > + if (of_node_cmp(cpun->type, "cpu")) > + continue; > > - /* Check for ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s. If it doesn't exist > - * fallback to "reg" property and assume no threads > + /* Check for non-standard "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s" property > + * for thread ids on PowerPC. If it doesn't exist fallback to > + * standard "reg" property. > */ > - intserv = of_get_property(np, "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s", > - &plen); > - if (intserv == NULL) { > - const u32 *reg = of_get_property(np, "reg", NULL); > - if (reg == NULL) > - continue; > - if (*reg == hardid) { > - if (thread) > - *thread = 0; > - return np; > - } > - } else { > - plen /= sizeof(u32); > - for (t = 0; t < plen; t++) { > - if (hardid == intserv[t]) { > - if (thread) > - *thread = t; > - return np; > - } > - } > - } > + if (__of_find_n_match_cpu_property(cpun, > + "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s", cpu, thread)) > + return cpun; > + > + if (__of_find_n_match_cpu_property(cpun, "reg", cpu, thread)) > + return cpun; > } > return NULL; > } >
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 13:22 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: > Correct, he has reviewed but I am waiting for his ACK before I could > sent you pull request. Hopefully I should be able to send pull request > tomorrow with his ACK. > > Hi Ben, > > If this is patch is fine, can I have your ACK ? I just want to test it (just in case...), will give an Ack then. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 10:30 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: > From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> > > Currently different drivers requiring to access cpu device node are > parsing the device tree themselves. Since the ordering in the DT need > not match the logical cpu ordering, the parsing logic needs to consider > that. However, this has resulted in lots of code duplication and in some > cases even incorrect logic. > > It's better to consolidate them by adding support for getting cpu > device node for a given logical cpu index in DT core library. However > logical to physical index mapping can be architecture specific. > > PowerPC has it's own implementation to get the cpu node for a given > logical index. > > This patch refactors the current implementation of of_get_cpu_node. > This in preparation to move the implementation to DT core library. > It separates out the logical to physical mapping so that a default > matching of the physical id to the logical cpu index can be added > when moved to common code. Architecture specific code can override it. So the patch unfortunately collides with other changes in powerpc -next, though it's not a huge deal and not hard to fixup, but expect Linus to tick unless we sort it out some other way. Appart from that, it's fine, builds on all my test configs and doesn't seem to negatively impact things as far as I can tell so far... Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> > Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c > index eb23ac9..f7b8c0b 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c > @@ -865,45 +865,63 @@ static int __init prom_reconfig_setup(void) > __initcall(prom_reconfig_setup); > #endif > > +bool arch_match_cpu_phys_id(int cpu, u64 phys_id) > +{ > + return (int)phys_id == get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu); > +} > + > +static bool __of_find_n_match_cpu_property(struct device_node *cpun, > + const char *prop_name, int cpu, unsigned int *thread) > +{ > + const __be32 *cell; > + int ac, prop_len, tid; > + u64 hwid; > + > + ac = of_n_addr_cells(cpun); > + cell = of_get_property(cpun, prop_name, &prop_len); > + if (!cell) > + return false; > + prop_len /= sizeof(*cell); > + for (tid = 0; tid < prop_len; tid++) { > + hwid = of_read_number(cell, ac); > + if (arch_match_cpu_phys_id(cpu, hwid)) { > + if (thread) > + *thread = tid; > + return true; > + } > + cell += ac; > + } > + return false; > +} > + > /* Find the device node for a given logical cpu number, also returns the cpu > * local thread number (index in ibm,interrupt-server#s) if relevant and > * asked for (non NULL) > */ > struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int *thread) > { > - int hardid; > - struct device_node *np; > + struct device_node *cpun, *cpus; > > - hardid = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu); > + cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus"); > + if (!cpus) { > + pr_warn("Missing cpus node, bailing out\n"); > + return NULL; > + } > > - for_each_node_by_type(np, "cpu") { > - const u32 *intserv; > - unsigned int plen, t; > + for_each_child_of_node(cpus, cpun) { > + if (of_node_cmp(cpun->type, "cpu")) > + continue; > > - /* Check for ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s. If it doesn't exist > - * fallback to "reg" property and assume no threads > + /* Check for non-standard "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s" property > + * for thread ids on PowerPC. If it doesn't exist fallback to > + * standard "reg" property. > */ > - intserv = of_get_property(np, "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s", > - &plen); > - if (intserv == NULL) { > - const u32 *reg = of_get_property(np, "reg", NULL); > - if (reg == NULL) > - continue; > - if (*reg == hardid) { > - if (thread) > - *thread = 0; > - return np; > - } > - } else { > - plen /= sizeof(u32); > - for (t = 0; t < plen; t++) { > - if (hardid == intserv[t]) { > - if (thread) > - *thread = t; > - return np; > - } > - } > - } > + if (__of_find_n_match_cpu_property(cpun, > + "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s", cpu, thread)) > + return cpun; > + > + if (__of_find_n_match_cpu_property(cpun, "reg", cpu, thread)) > + return cpun; > } > return NULL; > } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 22/08/13 07:15, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 10:30 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> >> >> Currently different drivers requiring to access cpu device node are >> parsing the device tree themselves. Since the ordering in the DT need >> not match the logical cpu ordering, the parsing logic needs to consider >> that. However, this has resulted in lots of code duplication and in some >> cases even incorrect logic. >> >> It's better to consolidate them by adding support for getting cpu >> device node for a given logical cpu index in DT core library. However >> logical to physical index mapping can be architecture specific. >> >> PowerPC has it's own implementation to get the cpu node for a given >> logical index. >> >> This patch refactors the current implementation of of_get_cpu_node. >> This in preparation to move the implementation to DT core library. >> It separates out the logical to physical mapping so that a default >> matching of the physical id to the logical cpu index can be added >> when moved to common code. Architecture specific code can override it. > > So the patch unfortunately collides with other changes in powerpc -next, > though it's not a huge deal and not hard to fixup, but expect Linus > to tick unless we sort it out some other way. > > Appart from that, it's fine, builds on all my test configs and doesn't > seem to negatively impact things as far as I can tell so far... > > Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> > Hi Ben, Thanks a lot for testing and ACK. I will check with Rafael about these (trivial) conflicts. Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c index eb23ac9..f7b8c0b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c @@ -865,45 +865,63 @@ static int __init prom_reconfig_setup(void) __initcall(prom_reconfig_setup); #endif +bool arch_match_cpu_phys_id(int cpu, u64 phys_id) +{ + return (int)phys_id == get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu); +} + +static bool __of_find_n_match_cpu_property(struct device_node *cpun, + const char *prop_name, int cpu, unsigned int *thread) +{ + const __be32 *cell; + int ac, prop_len, tid; + u64 hwid; + + ac = of_n_addr_cells(cpun); + cell = of_get_property(cpun, prop_name, &prop_len); + if (!cell) + return false; + prop_len /= sizeof(*cell); + for (tid = 0; tid < prop_len; tid++) { + hwid = of_read_number(cell, ac); + if (arch_match_cpu_phys_id(cpu, hwid)) { + if (thread) + *thread = tid; + return true; + } + cell += ac; + } + return false; +} + /* Find the device node for a given logical cpu number, also returns the cpu * local thread number (index in ibm,interrupt-server#s) if relevant and * asked for (non NULL) */ struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int *thread) { - int hardid; - struct device_node *np; + struct device_node *cpun, *cpus; - hardid = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu); + cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus"); + if (!cpus) { + pr_warn("Missing cpus node, bailing out\n"); + return NULL; + } - for_each_node_by_type(np, "cpu") { - const u32 *intserv; - unsigned int plen, t; + for_each_child_of_node(cpus, cpun) { + if (of_node_cmp(cpun->type, "cpu")) + continue; - /* Check for ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s. If it doesn't exist - * fallback to "reg" property and assume no threads + /* Check for non-standard "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s" property + * for thread ids on PowerPC. If it doesn't exist fallback to + * standard "reg" property. */ - intserv = of_get_property(np, "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s", - &plen); - if (intserv == NULL) { - const u32 *reg = of_get_property(np, "reg", NULL); - if (reg == NULL) - continue; - if (*reg == hardid) { - if (thread) - *thread = 0; - return np; - } - } else { - plen /= sizeof(u32); - for (t = 0; t < plen; t++) { - if (hardid == intserv[t]) { - if (thread) - *thread = t; - return np; - } - } - } + if (__of_find_n_match_cpu_property(cpun, + "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s", cpu, thread)) + return cpun; + + if (__of_find_n_match_cpu_property(cpun, "reg", cpu, thread)) + return cpun; } return NULL; }