| Message ID | 20131007105844.a260f37a9a941bed894adca3@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 10:58 +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote: > Patch written by Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com>: > > IOMMU groups are expected by certain users of the IOMMU API, > e.g. VFIO. Since each device is behind its own System MMU, we > can allocate a new IOMMU group for each device. > > Reviewd-by: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com> > --- > drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c > index 5025338..24505a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c > @@ -1028,6 +1028,32 @@ static phys_addr_t exynos_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain, > return phys; > } > > +static int exynos_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct iommu_group *group; > + int ret; > + > + group = iommu_group_get(dev); Seems reasonable, my only nit would be whether it's really an error to get a group back from the above call. If devices are always isolated and IOMMU groups are always singleton, it would be an error to find one already associated with the device. Right? Thanks, Alex > + > + if (!group) { > + group = iommu_group_alloc(); > + if (IS_ERR(group)) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate IOMMU group\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(group); > + } > + } > + > + ret = iommu_group_add_device(group, dev); > + iommu_group_put(group); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static void exynos_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev) > +{ > + iommu_group_remove_device(dev); > +} > + > static struct iommu_ops exynos_iommu_ops = { > .domain_init = &exynos_iommu_domain_init, > .domain_destroy = &exynos_iommu_domain_destroy, > @@ -1036,6 +1062,8 @@ static struct iommu_ops exynos_iommu_ops = { > .map = &exynos_iommu_map, > .unmap = &exynos_iommu_unmap, > .iova_to_phys = &exynos_iommu_iova_to_phys, > + .add_device = &exynos_iommu_add_device, > + .remove_device = &exynos_iommu_remove_device, > .pgsize_bitmap = SECT_SIZE | LPAGE_SIZE | SPAGE_SIZE, > }; >
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:54:29 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 10:58 +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote: > > Patch written by Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com>: > > > > IOMMU groups are expected by certain users of the IOMMU API, > > e.g. VFIO. Since each device is behind its own System MMU, we > > can allocate a new IOMMU group for each device. > > > > Reviewd-by: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com> > > Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com> > > --- > > drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c > > index 5025338..24505a0 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c > > @@ -1028,6 +1028,32 @@ static phys_addr_t exynos_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain, > > return phys; > > } > > > > +static int exynos_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev) > > +{ > > + struct iommu_group *group; > > + int ret; > > + > > + group = iommu_group_get(dev); > > Seems reasonable, my only nit would be whether it's really an error to > get a group back from the above call. If devices are always isolated > and IOMMU groups are always singleton, it would be an error to find one > already associated with the device. Right? Thanks, > Do you mean that calling iommu_group_add_device() with the group that is returned by the above iommu_group_get() will return -EEXIST? I didn't think about that. > Alex Thank you. KyongHo. > > > + > > + if (!group) { > > + group = iommu_group_alloc(); > > + if (IS_ERR(group)) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate IOMMU group\n"); > > + return PTR_ERR(group); > > + } > > + } > > + > > + ret = iommu_group_add_device(group, dev); > > + iommu_group_put(group); > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static void exynos_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev) > > +{ > > + iommu_group_remove_device(dev); > > +} > > + > > static struct iommu_ops exynos_iommu_ops = { > > .domain_init = &exynos_iommu_domain_init, > > .domain_destroy = &exynos_iommu_domain_destroy, > > @@ -1036,6 +1062,8 @@ static struct iommu_ops exynos_iommu_ops = { > > .map = &exynos_iommu_map, > > .unmap = &exynos_iommu_unmap, > > .iova_to_phys = &exynos_iommu_iova_to_phys, > > + .add_device = &exynos_iommu_add_device, > > + .remove_device = &exynos_iommu_remove_device, > > .pgsize_bitmap = SECT_SIZE | LPAGE_SIZE | SPAGE_SIZE, > > }; > > > > >
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c index 5025338..24505a0 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c @@ -1028,6 +1028,32 @@ static phys_addr_t exynos_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain, return phys; } +static int exynos_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev) +{ + struct iommu_group *group; + int ret; + + group = iommu_group_get(dev); + + if (!group) { + group = iommu_group_alloc(); + if (IS_ERR(group)) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate IOMMU group\n"); + return PTR_ERR(group); + } + } + + ret = iommu_group_add_device(group, dev); + iommu_group_put(group); + + return ret; +} + +static void exynos_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev) +{ + iommu_group_remove_device(dev); +} + static struct iommu_ops exynos_iommu_ops = { .domain_init = &exynos_iommu_domain_init, .domain_destroy = &exynos_iommu_domain_destroy, @@ -1036,6 +1062,8 @@ static struct iommu_ops exynos_iommu_ops = { .map = &exynos_iommu_map, .unmap = &exynos_iommu_unmap, .iova_to_phys = &exynos_iommu_iova_to_phys, + .add_device = &exynos_iommu_add_device, + .remove_device = &exynos_iommu_remove_device, .pgsize_bitmap = SECT_SIZE | LPAGE_SIZE | SPAGE_SIZE, };
Patch written by Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com>: IOMMU groups are expected by certain users of the IOMMU API, e.g. VFIO. Since each device is behind its own System MMU, we can allocate a new IOMMU group for each device. Reviewd-by: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com> --- drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)