Message ID | 1386625856-12942-6-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:50:38PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> > > Don't produce warning and interpret 0 as "default align" equal to > SMP_CACHE_BYTES in case if caller of memblock_alloc_base_nid() doesn't > specify alignment for the block (align == 0). > > This is done in preparation of introducing common memblock alloc > interface to make code behavior consistent. More details are > in below thread : > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/13/117. > > Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Thanks.
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 39855d4..784958d 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -883,8 +883,8 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_base_nid(phys_addr_t size, { phys_addr_t found; - if (WARN_ON(!align)) - align = __alignof__(long long); + if (!align) + align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES; /* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */ size = round_up(size, align);