Message ID | 1386264358-9738-2-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 07:25:49PM +0200, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c > @@ -877,6 +877,7 @@ static int __exit nand_davinci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > static struct platform_driver nand_davinci_driver = { > + .probe = nand_davinci_probe, > .remove = __exit_p(nand_davinci_remove), I believe you need to drop the __exit_p() here. And now that you're using module_platform_driver(), you need to drop the __init and __exit from the probe() and remove() routines, to avoid section mismatch warnings. > .driver = { > .name = "davinci_nand", So on second thought, please resubmit the series with the requested changes. Thanks, Brian
On 12/17/2013 11:24 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 07:25:49PM +0200, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c >> @@ -877,6 +877,7 @@ static int __exit nand_davinci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> } >> >> static struct platform_driver nand_davinci_driver = { >> + .probe = nand_davinci_probe, >> .remove = __exit_p(nand_davinci_remove), > > I believe you need to drop the __exit_p() here. And now that you're > using module_platform_driver(), you need to drop the __init and __exit > from the probe() and remove() routines, to avoid section mismatch > warnings. > >> .driver = { >> .name = "davinci_nand", > > So on second thought, please resubmit the series with the requested > changes. > > Thanks, > Brian > Thanks, Brian. Do you want me to drop it in stand alone patch or in this one?
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:21 AM, ivan.khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com> wrote: > On 12/17/2013 11:24 AM, Brian Norris wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 07:25:49PM +0200, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c >>> @@ -877,6 +877,7 @@ static int __exit nand_davinci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> } >>> >>> static struct platform_driver nand_davinci_driver = { >>> + .probe = nand_davinci_probe, >>> .remove = __exit_p(nand_davinci_remove), >> >> I believe you need to drop the __exit_p() here. And now that you're >> using module_platform_driver(), you need to drop the __init and __exit >> from the probe() and remove() routines, to avoid section mismatch >> warnings. > > Do you want me to drop it in stand alone patch or in this one? I think you can just do the __exit_p()/__init/__exit removal all in this same patch. The changes are all inter-related. Brian
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c index b77a01e..d87213f 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c @@ -877,6 +877,7 @@ static int __exit nand_davinci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) } static struct platform_driver nand_davinci_driver = { + .probe = nand_davinci_probe, .remove = __exit_p(nand_davinci_remove), .driver = { .name = "davinci_nand", @@ -886,7 +887,7 @@ static struct platform_driver nand_davinci_driver = { }; MODULE_ALIAS("platform:davinci_nand"); -module_platform_driver_probe(nand_davinci_driver, nand_davinci_probe); +module_platform_driver(nand_davinci_driver); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); MODULE_AUTHOR("Texas Instruments");