Message ID | 1393328937-26171-2-git-send-email-wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 07:48:57PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote: > Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > ctree.h | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ctree.h b/ctree.h > index 3cc3477..9b461af 100644 > --- a/ctree.h > +++ b/ctree.h > @@ -984,9 +984,11 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info { > struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices; > struct list_head space_info; > int system_allocs; > - int readonly; > - int on_restoring; > - int is_chunk_recover; > + > + unsigned int readonly:1; > + unsigned int on_restoring:1; > + unsigned int is_chunk_recover:1; Well, the integers are wasteful, but there's only one instance of fs_info per fsck run, so it saves like 8 bytes in total. I'm not sure this patch is needed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 02/26/2014 12:28 AM, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 07:48:57PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- >> ctree.h | 8 +++++--- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/ctree.h b/ctree.h >> index 3cc3477..9b461af 100644 >> --- a/ctree.h >> +++ b/ctree.h >> @@ -984,9 +984,11 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info { >> struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices; >> struct list_head space_info; >> int system_allocs; >> - int readonly; >> - int on_restoring; >> - int is_chunk_recover; >> + >> + unsigned int readonly:1; >> + unsigned int on_restoring:1; >> + unsigned int is_chunk_recover:1; > Well, the integers are wasteful, but there's only one instance of > fs_info per fsck run, so it saves like 8 bytes in total. I'm not sure > this patch is needed. Originally, i wrote this patch, it is because i was going to add a new flag. However, that approach has been replaced by a better idea. Anyway, this patch will be a good start, however, i don't insist on it. We can also change it when we have to add another flag later. David, just do what you like here. Thanks, Wang > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:25:24AM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote: > On 02/26/2014 12:28 AM, David Sterba wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 07:48:57PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote: > >>Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > >>--- > >> ctree.h | 8 +++++--- > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >>diff --git a/ctree.h b/ctree.h > >>index 3cc3477..9b461af 100644 > >>--- a/ctree.h > >>+++ b/ctree.h > >>@@ -984,9 +984,11 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info { > >> struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices; > >> struct list_head space_info; > >> int system_allocs; > >>- int readonly; > >>- int on_restoring; > >>- int is_chunk_recover; > >>+ > >>+ unsigned int readonly:1; > >>+ unsigned int on_restoring:1; > >>+ unsigned int is_chunk_recover:1; > >Well, the integers are wasteful, but there's only one instance of > >fs_info per fsck run, so it saves like 8 bytes in total. I'm not sure > >this patch is needed. > Originally, i wrote this patch, it is because i was going to add a new flag. > However, that approach has been replaced by a better idea. > > Anyway, this patch will be a good start, however, i don't insist on it. > We can also change it when we have to add another flag later. Ok, let's keep it, as an example of the pattern 'bitfields for flags'. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/ctree.h b/ctree.h index 3cc3477..9b461af 100644 --- a/ctree.h +++ b/ctree.h @@ -984,9 +984,11 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info { struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices; struct list_head space_info; int system_allocs; - int readonly; - int on_restoring; - int is_chunk_recover; + + unsigned int readonly:1; + unsigned int on_restoring:1; + unsigned int is_chunk_recover:1; + int (*free_extent_hook)(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytenr, u64 num_bytes, u64 parent,
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- ctree.h | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)