| Message ID | 1393590016-9361-6-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Am Freitag, den 28.02.2014, 14:20 +0200 schrieb Tomi Valkeinen: > Add DT binding documentation for MIPI DPI Panel. > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> > Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..72636c6f1c67 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > +Generic MIPI DPI Panel > +====================== > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: "panel-dpi" > + > +Optional properties: > +- label: a symbolic name for the panel > +- gpios: panel enable gpio and backlight enable gpio > + > +Required nodes: > +- "panel-timing" containing video timings > + (Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/display-timing.txt) > +- Video port for DPI input I don't see anything MIPI specific here. Couldn't this be added to the existing simple-panel binding? > +Example > +------- > + > +lcd0: display@0 { > + compatible = "samsung,lte430wq-f0c", "panel-dpi"; > + label = "lcd"; > + > + lcd_in: endpoint { > + remote-endpoint = <&dpi_out>; > + }; > + > + panel-timing { > + clock-frequency = <9200000>; > + hactive = <480>; > + vactive = <272>; > + hfront-porch = <8>; > + hback-porch = <4>; > + hsync-len = <41>; > + vback-porch = <2>; > + vfront-porch = <4>; > + vsync-len = <10>; > + > + hsync-active = <0>; > + vsync-active = <0>; > + de-active = <1>; > + pixelclk-active = <1>; > + }; > +}; regards Philipp
On 28/02/14 15:40, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Am Freitag, den 28.02.2014, 14:20 +0200 schrieb Tomi Valkeinen: >> Add DT binding documentation for MIPI DPI Panel. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> >> Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..72636c6f1c67 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ >> +Generic MIPI DPI Panel >> +====================== >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible: "panel-dpi" >> + >> +Optional properties: >> +- label: a symbolic name for the panel >> +- gpios: panel enable gpio and backlight enable gpio >> + >> +Required nodes: >> +- "panel-timing" containing video timings >> + (Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/display-timing.txt) >> +- Video port for DPI input > > I don't see anything MIPI specific here. Couldn't this be added to the > existing simple-panel binding? Hmm, well, the simple-panel bindings doesn't define video ports, and not even a common compatible property. Tomi
Hi Tomi, Thank you for the patch. On Friday 28 February 2014 14:20:12 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Add DT binding documentation for MIPI DPI Panel. > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> > Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt | 43 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt new file mode > 100644 > index 000000000000..72636c6f1c67 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > +Generic MIPI DPI Panel > +====================== > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: "panel-dpi" > + > +Optional properties: > +- label: a symbolic name for the panel > +- gpios: panel enable gpio and backlight enable gpio While integrated in the panel module, the backlight is a separate piece of hardware, which could be controlled through other means (I2C for instance). Wouldn't it be better to add an explicit DT node for the backlight device and reference that node from the panel node ? > + > +Required nodes: > +- "panel-timing" containing video timings > + (Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/display-timing.txt) > +- Video port for DPI input > + > +Example > +------- > + > +lcd0: display@0 { > + compatible = "samsung,lte430wq-f0c", "panel-dpi"; > + label = "lcd"; > + > + lcd_in: endpoint { > + remote-endpoint = <&dpi_out>; > + }; > + > + panel-timing { > + clock-frequency = <9200000>; > + hactive = <480>; > + vactive = <272>; > + hfront-porch = <8>; > + hback-porch = <4>; > + hsync-len = <41>; > + vback-porch = <2>; > + vfront-porch = <4>; > + vsync-len = <10>; > + > + hsync-active = <0>; > + vsync-active = <0>; > + de-active = <1>; > + pixelclk-active = <1>; > + }; > +};
On 17/03/14 16:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> +Generic MIPI DPI Panel >> +====================== >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible: "panel-dpi" >> + >> +Optional properties: >> +- label: a symbolic name for the panel >> +- gpios: panel enable gpio and backlight enable gpio > > While integrated in the panel module, the backlight is a separate piece of > hardware, which could be controlled through other means (I2C for instance). > Wouldn't it be better to add an explicit DT node for the backlight device and > reference that node from the panel node ? Yes, I agree, but do we have the infrastructure or bindings for that? Ah, I see we now do have a gpio-backlight driver, but it doesn't have DT bindings. Tomi
On 18/03/14 08:41, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 17/03/14 16:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> +Generic MIPI DPI Panel >>> +====================== >>> + >>> +Required properties: >>> +- compatible: "panel-dpi" >>> + >>> +Optional properties: >>> +- label: a symbolic name for the panel >>> +- gpios: panel enable gpio and backlight enable gpio >> >> While integrated in the panel module, the backlight is a separate piece of >> hardware, which could be controlled through other means (I2C for instance). >> Wouldn't it be better to add an explicit DT node for the backlight device and >> reference that node from the panel node ? > > Yes, I agree, but do we have the infrastructure or bindings for that? > > Ah, I see we now do have a gpio-backlight driver, but it doesn't have DT > bindings. Seems there's a patch from Denis Carikli for this, which will probably be merged for 3.15. I realized I don't actually use panel-dpi at the moment in my OMAP DSS DT series, as I dropped the board changes that used panel-dpi. So I'll drop panel-dpi bindings from my series, and the backlight for panel-dpi can then be fixed for 3.16. Tomi
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..72636c6f1c67 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/panel-dpi.txt @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +Generic MIPI DPI Panel +====================== + +Required properties: +- compatible: "panel-dpi" + +Optional properties: +- label: a symbolic name for the panel +- gpios: panel enable gpio and backlight enable gpio + +Required nodes: +- "panel-timing" containing video timings + (Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/display-timing.txt) +- Video port for DPI input + +Example +------- + +lcd0: display@0 { + compatible = "samsung,lte430wq-f0c", "panel-dpi"; + label = "lcd"; + + lcd_in: endpoint { + remote-endpoint = <&dpi_out>; + }; + + panel-timing { + clock-frequency = <9200000>; + hactive = <480>; + vactive = <272>; + hfront-porch = <8>; + hback-porch = <4>; + hsync-len = <41>; + vback-porch = <2>; + vfront-porch = <4>; + vsync-len = <10>; + + hsync-active = <0>; + vsync-active = <0>; + de-active = <1>; + pixelclk-active = <1>; + }; +};