| Message ID | 1395061795-17777-2-git-send-email-vikas.sajjan@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Vikas, On 17 March 2014 18:39, Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@samsung.com> wrote: > Instead of hardcoding the PMU details for each SoC, pass this information > through device tree (DT). > > Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@samsung.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt | 5 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 5 ++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi | 5 ++ > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 51 +++++++++++++------- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 3 -- > 5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt > index f1f1552..667a7f0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt > @@ -2,14 +2,15 @@ SAMSUNG Exynos SoC series PMU Registers > > Properties: > - compatible : should contain two values. First value must be one from following list: > + - "samsung,exynos4210-pmu" - for Exynos4210 and Exynos4x12 SoC, > - "samsung,exynos5250-pmu" - for Exynos5250 SoC, > - - "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" - for Exynos5420 SoC. > + - "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" - for Exynos5420 and Exynos5260 SoC. > second value must be always "syscon". > > - reg : offset and length of the register set. > > Example : > pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10040000 { > - compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", "syscon"; > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu"; If you have removed "syscon" deliberately above, then you should also remove the same in the binding description which says "second value must be always "syscon".".
On 17.03.2014 15:23, Sachin Kamat wrote: > Hi Vikas, > > On 17 March 2014 18:39, Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@samsung.com> wrote: >> Instead of hardcoding the PMU details for each SoC, pass this information >> through device tree (DT). >> >> Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@samsung.com> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt | 5 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 5 ++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi | 5 ++ >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 51 +++++++++++++------- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 3 -- >> 5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt >> index f1f1552..667a7f0 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt >> @@ -2,14 +2,15 @@ SAMSUNG Exynos SoC series PMU Registers >> >> Properties: >> - compatible : should contain two values. First value must be one from following list: >> + - "samsung,exynos4210-pmu" - for Exynos4210 and Exynos4x12 SoC, >> - "samsung,exynos5250-pmu" - for Exynos5250 SoC, >> - - "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" - for Exynos5420 SoC. >> + - "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" - for Exynos5420 and Exynos5260 SoC. >> second value must be always "syscon". >> >> - reg : offset and length of the register set. >> >> Example : >> pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10040000 { >> - compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", "syscon"; >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu"; > > If you have removed "syscon" deliberately above, then you should also > remove the same in the > binding description which says "second value must be always "syscon".". > I believe that "syscon" should be still present as I don't see any code providing access to PMU registers to other drivers, that could replace the standard syscon interface, being added by this series. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Vikas, On 17.03.2014 14:09, Vikas Sajjan wrote: > Instead of hardcoding the PMU details for each SoC, pass this information > through device tree (DT). > > Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@samsung.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt | 5 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 5 ++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi | 5 ++ > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 51 +++++++++++++------- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 3 -- > 5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt > index f1f1552..667a7f0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt > @@ -2,14 +2,15 @@ SAMSUNG Exynos SoC series PMU Registers > > Properties: > - compatible : should contain two values. First value must be one from following list: > + - "samsung,exynos4210-pmu" - for Exynos4210 and Exynos4x12 SoC, > - "samsung,exynos5250-pmu" - for Exynos5250 SoC, > - - "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" - for Exynos5420 SoC. > + - "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" - for Exynos5420 and Exynos5260 SoC. Do Exynos5420 and 5260 really have identical PMU blocks with the same register layouts? If not, they should have different compatible strings. > second value must be always "syscon". > > - reg : offset and length of the register set. > > Example : > pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10040000 { > - compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", "syscon"; > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu"; > reg = <0x10040000 0x5000>; > }; > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi > index 08452e1..94cbafa 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi > @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ > #phy-cells = <1>; > }; > > + pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10020000 { > + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu"; Missing "syscon" compatible string. > + reg = <0x10020000 0x4000>; > + }; > + > pd_mfc: mfc-power-domain@10023C40 { > compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; > reg = <0x10023C40 0x20>; > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi > index a93fea8..2a4dace 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi > @@ -264,6 +264,11 @@ > }; > }; > > + pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10D50000 { > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pmu"; Missing "syscon" compatible string. > + reg = <0x10D50000 0x5000>; > + }; > + > pinctrl_0: pinctrl@11600000 { > compatible = "samsung,exynos5260-pinctrl"; > reg = <0x11600000 0x1000>; > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > index 1df81ff..c75733b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > @@ -79,11 +79,6 @@ static struct map_desc exynos4_iodesc[] __initdata = { > .length = SZ_4K, > .type = MT_DEVICE, > }, { > - .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, > - .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS4_PA_PMU), > - .length = SZ_64K, > - .type = MT_DEVICE, > - }, { > .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_COMBINER_BASE, > .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS4_PA_COMBINER), > .length = SZ_4K, > @@ -157,11 +152,6 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = { > .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS5_PA_CMU), > .length = 144 * SZ_1K, > .type = MT_DEVICE, > - }, { > - .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, > - .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS5_PA_PMU), > - .length = SZ_64K, > - .type = MT_DEVICE, > }, > }; > > @@ -243,12 +233,12 @@ static int __init exynos_fdt_map_chipid(unsigned long node, const char *uname, > return 1; > } > > -struct __sysram_desc { > +struct __exynos_reg_desc { > char name[32]; > unsigned long addr; > }; > > -static struct __sysram_desc sysram_desc[] __initdata = { > +static struct __exynos_reg_desc exynos_sysram_desc[] __initdata = { > { > .name = "samsung,exynos4210-sysram", > .addr = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SYSRAM, > @@ -258,7 +248,20 @@ static struct __sysram_desc sysram_desc[] __initdata = { > }, > }; > > -static int __init exynos_fdt_map_sysram(unsigned long node, const char *uname, > +static struct __exynos_reg_desc exynos_pmu_desc[] __initdata = { > + { > + .name = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu", > + .addr = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, > + }, { > + .name = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", > + .addr = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, > + }, { > + .name = "samsung,exynos5420-pmu", > + .addr = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, > + }, > +}; > + > +static int __init exynos_fdt_map_reg(unsigned long node, const char *uname, > int depth, void *data) > { > struct map_desc iodesc; > @@ -266,12 +269,26 @@ static int __init exynos_fdt_map_sysram(unsigned long node, const char *uname, > unsigned long len; > int i; > > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sysram_desc); i++) { > - if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, sysram_desc[i].name)) { > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_sysram_desc); i++) { > + if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, > + exynos_sysram_desc[i].name)) { > + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", &len); > + if (!reg || len != (sizeof(unsigned long) * 2)) > + return -ENODEV; > + iodesc.virtual = exynos_sysram_desc[i].addr; > + iodesc.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(be32_to_cpu(reg[0])); > + iodesc.length = be32_to_cpu(reg[1]); > + iodesc.type = MT_DEVICE; > + iotable_init(&iodesc, 1); > + } > + } > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_pmu_desc); i++) { > + if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, exynos_pmu_desc[i].name)) { > reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", &len); > if (!reg || len != (sizeof(unsigned long) * 2)) > return -ENODEV; > - iodesc.virtual = sysram_desc[i].addr; > + iodesc.virtual = exynos_pmu_desc[i].addr; > iodesc.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(be32_to_cpu(reg[0])); > iodesc.length = be32_to_cpu(reg[1]); > iodesc.type = MT_DEVICE; > @@ -298,7 +315,7 @@ void __init exynos_init_io(void) > > exynos_map_io(); > > - of_scan_flat_dt(exynos_fdt_map_sysram, NULL); > + of_scan_flat_dt(exynos_fdt_map_reg, NULL); Do you really need to map PMU statically using iotable_init() at fixed virtual address? Shouldn't rather actual users of PMU registers bind to PMU node and use of_iomap()? Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Vikas, As you comment, I found the history of this patch in mailing list. It seems like that this patch stop the review. Besides, Pankaj posted same patch to support PMU as following: - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/2/48 Do you have a plan to resend or not? because I need this patch to remove PMU static memory mapping for Exynos3250. Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi On 03/17/2014 10:09 PM, Vikas Sajjan wrote: > Instead of hardcoding the PMU details for each SoC, pass this information > through device tree (DT). > > Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@samsung.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt | 5 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 5 ++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi | 5 ++ > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 51 +++++++++++++------- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 3 -- > 5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt > index f1f1552..667a7f0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt > @@ -2,14 +2,15 @@ SAMSUNG Exynos SoC series PMU Registers > > Properties: > - compatible : should contain two values. First value must be one from following list: > + - "samsung,exynos4210-pmu" - for Exynos4210 and Exynos4x12 SoC, > - "samsung,exynos5250-pmu" - for Exynos5250 SoC, > - - "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" - for Exynos5420 SoC. > + - "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" - for Exynos5420 and Exynos5260 SoC. > second value must be always "syscon". > > - reg : offset and length of the register set. > > Example : > pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10040000 { > - compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", "syscon"; > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu"; > reg = <0x10040000 0x5000>; > }; > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi > index 08452e1..94cbafa 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi > @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ > #phy-cells = <1>; > }; > > + pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10020000 { > + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu"; > + reg = <0x10020000 0x4000>; > + }; > + > pd_mfc: mfc-power-domain@10023C40 { > compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; > reg = <0x10023C40 0x20>; > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi > index a93fea8..2a4dace 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi > @@ -264,6 +264,11 @@ > }; > }; > > + pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10D50000 { > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pmu"; > + reg = <0x10D50000 0x5000>; > + }; > + > pinctrl_0: pinctrl@11600000 { > compatible = "samsung,exynos5260-pinctrl"; > reg = <0x11600000 0x1000>; > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > index 1df81ff..c75733b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c > @@ -79,11 +79,6 @@ static struct map_desc exynos4_iodesc[] __initdata = { > .length = SZ_4K, > .type = MT_DEVICE, > }, { > - .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, > - .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS4_PA_PMU), > - .length = SZ_64K, > - .type = MT_DEVICE, > - }, { > .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_COMBINER_BASE, > .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS4_PA_COMBINER), > .length = SZ_4K, > @@ -157,11 +152,6 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = { > .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS5_PA_CMU), > .length = 144 * SZ_1K, > .type = MT_DEVICE, > - }, { > - .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, > - .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS5_PA_PMU), > - .length = SZ_64K, > - .type = MT_DEVICE, > }, > }; > > @@ -243,12 +233,12 @@ static int __init exynos_fdt_map_chipid(unsigned long node, const char *uname, > return 1; > } > > -struct __sysram_desc { > +struct __exynos_reg_desc { > char name[32]; > unsigned long addr; > }; > > -static struct __sysram_desc sysram_desc[] __initdata = { > +static struct __exynos_reg_desc exynos_sysram_desc[] __initdata = { > { > .name = "samsung,exynos4210-sysram", > .addr = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SYSRAM, > @@ -258,7 +248,20 @@ static struct __sysram_desc sysram_desc[] __initdata = { > }, > }; > > -static int __init exynos_fdt_map_sysram(unsigned long node, const char *uname, > +static struct __exynos_reg_desc exynos_pmu_desc[] __initdata = { > + { > + .name = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu", > + .addr = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, > + }, { > + .name = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", > + .addr = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, > + }, { > + .name = "samsung,exynos5420-pmu", > + .addr = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, > + }, > +}; > + > +static int __init exynos_fdt_map_reg(unsigned long node, const char *uname, > int depth, void *data) > { > struct map_desc iodesc; > @@ -266,12 +269,26 @@ static int __init exynos_fdt_map_sysram(unsigned long node, const char *uname, > unsigned long len; > int i; > > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sysram_desc); i++) { > - if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, sysram_desc[i].name)) { > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_sysram_desc); i++) { > + if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, > + exynos_sysram_desc[i].name)) { > + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", &len); > + if (!reg || len != (sizeof(unsigned long) * 2)) > + return -ENODEV; > + iodesc.virtual = exynos_sysram_desc[i].addr; > + iodesc.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(be32_to_cpu(reg[0])); > + iodesc.length = be32_to_cpu(reg[1]); > + iodesc.type = MT_DEVICE; > + iotable_init(&iodesc, 1); > + } > + } > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_pmu_desc); i++) { > + if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, exynos_pmu_desc[i].name)) { > reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", &len); > if (!reg || len != (sizeof(unsigned long) * 2)) > return -ENODEV; > - iodesc.virtual = sysram_desc[i].addr; > + iodesc.virtual = exynos_pmu_desc[i].addr; > iodesc.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(be32_to_cpu(reg[0])); > iodesc.length = be32_to_cpu(reg[1]); > iodesc.type = MT_DEVICE; > @@ -298,7 +315,7 @@ void __init exynos_init_io(void) > > exynos_map_io(); > > - of_scan_flat_dt(exynos_fdt_map_sysram, NULL); > + of_scan_flat_dt(exynos_fdt_map_reg, NULL); > } > > static void __init exynos_map_io(void) > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h > index 548269a..34eee6e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h > @@ -28,9 +28,6 @@ > #define EXYNOS4_PA_SYSCON 0x10010000 > #define EXYNOS5_PA_SYSCON 0x10050100 > > -#define EXYNOS4_PA_PMU 0x10020000 > -#define EXYNOS5_PA_PMU 0x10040000 > - > #define EXYNOS4_PA_CMU 0x10030000 > #define EXYNOS5_PA_CMU 0x10010000 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt index f1f1552..667a7f0 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt @@ -2,14 +2,15 @@ SAMSUNG Exynos SoC series PMU Registers Properties: - compatible : should contain two values. First value must be one from following list: + - "samsung,exynos4210-pmu" - for Exynos4210 and Exynos4x12 SoC, - "samsung,exynos5250-pmu" - for Exynos5250 SoC, - - "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" - for Exynos5420 SoC. + - "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" - for Exynos5420 and Exynos5260 SoC. second value must be always "syscon". - reg : offset and length of the register set. Example : pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10040000 { - compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", "syscon"; + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu"; reg = <0x10040000 0x5000>; }; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi index 08452e1..94cbafa 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ #phy-cells = <1>; }; + pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10020000 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu"; + reg = <0x10020000 0x4000>; + }; + pd_mfc: mfc-power-domain@10023C40 { compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd"; reg = <0x10023C40 0x20>; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi index a93fea8..2a4dace 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi @@ -264,6 +264,11 @@ }; }; + pmu_system_controller: system-controller@10D50000 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pmu"; + reg = <0x10D50000 0x5000>; + }; + pinctrl_0: pinctrl@11600000 { compatible = "samsung,exynos5260-pinctrl"; reg = <0x11600000 0x1000>; diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c index 1df81ff..c75733b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c @@ -79,11 +79,6 @@ static struct map_desc exynos4_iodesc[] __initdata = { .length = SZ_4K, .type = MT_DEVICE, }, { - .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, - .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS4_PA_PMU), - .length = SZ_64K, - .type = MT_DEVICE, - }, { .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_COMBINER_BASE, .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS4_PA_COMBINER), .length = SZ_4K, @@ -157,11 +152,6 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = { .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS5_PA_CMU), .length = 144 * SZ_1K, .type = MT_DEVICE, - }, { - .virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, - .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(EXYNOS5_PA_PMU), - .length = SZ_64K, - .type = MT_DEVICE, }, }; @@ -243,12 +233,12 @@ static int __init exynos_fdt_map_chipid(unsigned long node, const char *uname, return 1; } -struct __sysram_desc { +struct __exynos_reg_desc { char name[32]; unsigned long addr; }; -static struct __sysram_desc sysram_desc[] __initdata = { +static struct __exynos_reg_desc exynos_sysram_desc[] __initdata = { { .name = "samsung,exynos4210-sysram", .addr = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_SYSRAM, @@ -258,7 +248,20 @@ static struct __sysram_desc sysram_desc[] __initdata = { }, }; -static int __init exynos_fdt_map_sysram(unsigned long node, const char *uname, +static struct __exynos_reg_desc exynos_pmu_desc[] __initdata = { + { + .name = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu", + .addr = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, + }, { + .name = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", + .addr = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, + }, { + .name = "samsung,exynos5420-pmu", + .addr = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_PMU, + }, +}; + +static int __init exynos_fdt_map_reg(unsigned long node, const char *uname, int depth, void *data) { struct map_desc iodesc; @@ -266,12 +269,26 @@ static int __init exynos_fdt_map_sysram(unsigned long node, const char *uname, unsigned long len; int i; - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sysram_desc); i++) { - if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, sysram_desc[i].name)) { + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_sysram_desc); i++) { + if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, + exynos_sysram_desc[i].name)) { + reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", &len); + if (!reg || len != (sizeof(unsigned long) * 2)) + return -ENODEV; + iodesc.virtual = exynos_sysram_desc[i].addr; + iodesc.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(be32_to_cpu(reg[0])); + iodesc.length = be32_to_cpu(reg[1]); + iodesc.type = MT_DEVICE; + iotable_init(&iodesc, 1); + } + } + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_pmu_desc); i++) { + if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, exynos_pmu_desc[i].name)) { reg = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reg", &len); if (!reg || len != (sizeof(unsigned long) * 2)) return -ENODEV; - iodesc.virtual = sysram_desc[i].addr; + iodesc.virtual = exynos_pmu_desc[i].addr; iodesc.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(be32_to_cpu(reg[0])); iodesc.length = be32_to_cpu(reg[1]); iodesc.type = MT_DEVICE; @@ -298,7 +315,7 @@ void __init exynos_init_io(void) exynos_map_io(); - of_scan_flat_dt(exynos_fdt_map_sysram, NULL); + of_scan_flat_dt(exynos_fdt_map_reg, NULL); } static void __init exynos_map_io(void) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h index 548269a..34eee6e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h @@ -28,9 +28,6 @@ #define EXYNOS4_PA_SYSCON 0x10010000 #define EXYNOS5_PA_SYSCON 0x10050100 -#define EXYNOS4_PA_PMU 0x10020000 -#define EXYNOS5_PA_PMU 0x10040000 - #define EXYNOS4_PA_CMU 0x10030000 #define EXYNOS5_PA_CMU 0x10010000
Instead of hardcoding the PMU details for each SoC, pass this information through device tree (DT). Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@samsung.com> --- .../devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/pmu.txt | 5 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 5 ++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi | 5 ++ arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 51 +++++++++++++------- arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 3 -- 5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)