diff mbox

thermal: samsung: Only update available threshold limits

Message ID 1397453895-6688-1-git-send-email-tushar.behera@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Zhang Rui
Headers show

Commit Message

Tushar Behera April 14, 2014, 5:38 a.m. UTC
Currently the threshold limits are updated in 2 stages, once for all
software trigger levels and again for hardware trip point.

While updating the software trigger levels, it overwrites the threshold
limit for hardware trip point thereby forcing the Exynos core to issue
an emergency shutdown.

Updating only the required fields in threshold register fixes this issue.

Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
---
Based on v3.15-rc1.

 drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Tushar Behera April 24, 2014, 3:17 a.m. UTC | #1
On 04/14/2014 11:08 AM, Tushar Behera wrote:
> Currently the threshold limits are updated in 2 stages, once for all
> software trigger levels and again for hardware trip point.
> 
> While updating the software trigger levels, it overwrites the threshold
> limit for hardware trip point thereby forcing the Exynos core to issue
> an emergency shutdown.
> 
> Updating only the required fields in threshold register fixes this issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
> ---
> Based on v3.15-rc1.
> 
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 0d96a51..ffccc89 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -225,6 +225,8 @@ skip_calib_data:
>  			trigger_levs++;
>  	}
>  
> +	rising_threshold = readl(data->base + reg->threshold_th0);
> +
>  	if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210) {
>  		/* Write temperature code for threshold */
>  		threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, pdata->threshold);
> @@ -249,6 +251,7 @@ skip_calib_data:
>  				ret = threshold_code;
>  				goto out;
>  			}
> +			rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
>  			rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
>  			if (pdata->threshold_falling) {
>  				threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
> @@ -281,6 +284,7 @@ skip_calib_data:
>  			}
>  			if (i == EXYNOS_MAX_TRIGGER_PER_REG - 1) {
>  				/* 1-4 level to be assigned in th0 reg */
> +				rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
>  				rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
>  				writel(rising_threshold,
>  					data->base + reg->threshold_th0);
> 

Adding Amit to get Samsung specific review.
amit kachhap April 24, 2014, 6:18 a.m. UTC | #2
On 4/14/14, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
> Currently the threshold limits are updated in 2 stages, once for all
> software trigger levels and again for hardware trip point.
I guess the first stage is bootloader as could not find this in this file.
Anyways the changes looks fine to me.

Acked-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>

>
> While updating the software trigger levels, it overwrites the threshold
> limit for hardware trip point thereby forcing the Exynos core to issue
> an emergency shutdown.
>
> Updating only the required fields in threshold register fixes this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
> ---
> Based on v3.15-rc1.
>
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 0d96a51..ffccc89 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -225,6 +225,8 @@ skip_calib_data:
>  			trigger_levs++;
>  	}
>
> +	rising_threshold = readl(data->base + reg->threshold_th0);
> +
>  	if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210) {
>  		/* Write temperature code for threshold */
>  		threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, pdata->threshold);
> @@ -249,6 +251,7 @@ skip_calib_data:
>  				ret = threshold_code;
>  				goto out;
>  			}
> +			rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
>  			rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
>  			if (pdata->threshold_falling) {
>  				threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
> @@ -281,6 +284,7 @@ skip_calib_data:
>  			}
>  			if (i == EXYNOS_MAX_TRIGGER_PER_REG - 1) {
>  				/* 1-4 level to be assigned in th0 reg */
> +				rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
>  				rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
>  				writel(rising_threshold,
>  					data->base + reg->threshold_th0);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz April 24, 2014, 10:48 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi,

On Monday, April 14, 2014 11:08:15 AM Tushar Behera wrote:
> Currently the threshold limits are updated in 2 stages, once for all
> software trigger levels and again for hardware trip point.
> 
> While updating the software trigger levels, it overwrites the threshold
> limit for hardware trip point thereby forcing the Exynos core to issue
> an emergency shutdown.

On what SoC type have you encountered this problem?  It doesn't seem to
happen on older SoCs (at least Exynos4210 and Exynos4x12 ones).

> Updating only the required fields in threshold register fixes this issue.

With the current code there is indeed a time window during which threshold
limit for hardware trip point is set to zero so the fix is correct.

> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
> ---
> Based on v3.15-rc1.
> 
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 0d96a51..ffccc89 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -225,6 +225,8 @@ skip_calib_data:
>  			trigger_levs++;
>  	}
>  
> +	rising_threshold = readl(data->base + reg->threshold_th0);

You may move this inside "} else {" block as rising_threshold
is not used for data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210 case.

Also rising_threshold initialization to zero at the beginning of
exynos_tmu_initialize() is not needed anylonger.

> +
>  	if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210) {
>  		/* Write temperature code for threshold */
>  		threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, pdata->threshold);
> @@ -249,6 +251,7 @@ skip_calib_data:
>  				ret = threshold_code;
>  				goto out;
>  			}
> +			rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
>  			rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
>  			if (pdata->threshold_falling) {
>  				threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
> @@ -281,6 +284,7 @@ skip_calib_data:
>  			}
>  			if (i == EXYNOS_MAX_TRIGGER_PER_REG - 1) {
>  				/* 1-4 level to be assigned in th0 reg */
> +				rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
>  				rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
>  				writel(rising_threshold,
>  					data->base + reg->threshold_th0);

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tushar Behera April 24, 2014, 11:30 a.m. UTC | #4
On 04/24/2014 04:18 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Monday, April 14, 2014 11:08:15 AM Tushar Behera wrote:
>> Currently the threshold limits are updated in 2 stages, once for all
>> software trigger levels and again for hardware trip point.
>>
>> While updating the software trigger levels, it overwrites the threshold
>> limit for hardware trip point thereby forcing the Exynos core to issue
>> an emergency shutdown.
> 
> On what SoC type have you encountered this problem?  It doesn't seem to
> happen on older SoCs (at least Exynos4210 and Exynos4x12 ones).
> 

I found this issue while testing on Exynos5420 with these patches [1].

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/1/38

>> Updating only the required fields in threshold register fixes this issue.
> 
> With the current code there is indeed a time window during which threshold
> limit for hardware trip point is set to zero so the fix is correct.
>
Tushar Behera May 9, 2014, 11:47 a.m. UTC | #5
On 04/24/2014 11:48 AM, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> On 4/14/14, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Currently the threshold limits are updated in 2 stages, once for all
>> software trigger levels and again for hardware trip point.
> I guess the first stage is bootloader as could not find this in this file.
> Anyways the changes looks fine to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
> 

Can this the patch be merged now?

>>
>> While updating the software trigger levels, it overwrites the threshold
>> limit for hardware trip point thereby forcing the Exynos core to issue
>> an emergency shutdown.
>>
>> Updating only the required fields in threshold register fixes this issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> Based on v3.15-rc1.
>>
>>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c |    4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> index 0d96a51..ffccc89 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> @@ -225,6 +225,8 @@ skip_calib_data:
>>  			trigger_levs++;
>>  	}
>>
>> +	rising_threshold = readl(data->base + reg->threshold_th0);
>> +
>>  	if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210) {
>>  		/* Write temperature code for threshold */
>>  		threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, pdata->threshold);
>> @@ -249,6 +251,7 @@ skip_calib_data:
>>  				ret = threshold_code;
>>  				goto out;
>>  			}
>> +			rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
>>  			rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
>>  			if (pdata->threshold_falling) {
>>  				threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
>> @@ -281,6 +284,7 @@ skip_calib_data:
>>  			}
>>  			if (i == EXYNOS_MAX_TRIGGER_PER_REG - 1) {
>>  				/* 1-4 level to be assigned in th0 reg */
>> +				rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
>>  				rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
>>  				writel(rising_threshold,
>>  					data->base + reg->threshold_th0);
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc"
>> in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
Zhang Rui May 15, 2014, 8:45 a.m. UTC | #6
On ?, 2014-04-24 at 11:48 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> On 4/14/14, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Currently the threshold limits are updated in 2 stages, once for all
> > software trigger levels and again for hardware trip point.
> I guess the first stage is bootloader as could not find this in this file.
> Anyways the changes looks fine to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>

applied.

thanks,
rui
> 
> >
> > While updating the software trigger levels, it overwrites the threshold
> > limit for hardware trip point thereby forcing the Exynos core to issue
> > an emergency shutdown.
> >
> > Updating only the required fields in threshold register fixes this issue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > Based on v3.15-rc1.
> >
> >  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c |    4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > index 0d96a51..ffccc89 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > @@ -225,6 +225,8 @@ skip_calib_data:
> >  			trigger_levs++;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	rising_threshold = readl(data->base + reg->threshold_th0);
> > +
> >  	if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210) {
> >  		/* Write temperature code for threshold */
> >  		threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, pdata->threshold);
> > @@ -249,6 +251,7 @@ skip_calib_data:
> >  				ret = threshold_code;
> >  				goto out;
> >  			}
> > +			rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
> >  			rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
> >  			if (pdata->threshold_falling) {
> >  				threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
> > @@ -281,6 +284,7 @@ skip_calib_data:
> >  			}
> >  			if (i == EXYNOS_MAX_TRIGGER_PER_REG - 1) {
> >  				/* 1-4 level to be assigned in th0 reg */
> > +				rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
> >  				rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
> >  				writel(rising_threshold,
> >  					data->base + reg->threshold_th0);
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc"
> > in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index 0d96a51..ffccc89 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -225,6 +225,8 @@  skip_calib_data:
 			trigger_levs++;
 	}
 
+	rising_threshold = readl(data->base + reg->threshold_th0);
+
 	if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210) {
 		/* Write temperature code for threshold */
 		threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, pdata->threshold);
@@ -249,6 +251,7 @@  skip_calib_data:
 				ret = threshold_code;
 				goto out;
 			}
+			rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
 			rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
 			if (pdata->threshold_falling) {
 				threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
@@ -281,6 +284,7 @@  skip_calib_data:
 			}
 			if (i == EXYNOS_MAX_TRIGGER_PER_REG - 1) {
 				/* 1-4 level to be assigned in th0 reg */
+				rising_threshold &= ~(0xff << 8 * i);
 				rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
 				writel(rising_threshold,
 					data->base + reg->threshold_th0);