| Message ID | 1398375849-6017-10-git-send-email-joelf@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
* Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> [140424 14:44]: > The subsequent devm_ioremap_resource will catch it and print an error, let it > be checked there. > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> > --- > arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c > index 7e806f9..1fd30fa 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c > @@ -810,10 +810,6 @@ static int omap_dm_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > - if (unlikely(!mem)) { > - dev_err(dev, "%s: no memory resource.\n", __func__); > - return -ENODEV; > - } > > timer = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct omap_dm_timer), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!timer) { We still need to return an error here and not try to continue though. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 05/07/2014 10:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> [140424 14:44]: >> The subsequent devm_ioremap_resource will catch it and print an error, let it >> be checked there. >> >> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c | 4 ---- >> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c >> index 7e806f9..1fd30fa 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c >> @@ -810,10 +810,6 @@ static int omap_dm_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> } >> >> mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); >> - if (unlikely(!mem)) { >> - dev_err(dev, "%s: no memory resource.\n", __func__); >> - return -ENODEV; >> - } >> >> timer = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct omap_dm_timer), GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!timer) { > > We still need to return an error here and not try to continue though. We are returning an error if mem is NULL so the redundant check is unnecessary: ... timer->io_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, mem); if (IS_ERR(timer->io_base)) return PTR_ERR(timer->io_base); thanks, -Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> [140507 14:53]: > On 05/07/2014 10:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> [140424 14:44]: > >> The subsequent devm_ioremap_resource will catch it and print an error, let it > >> be checked there. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> > >> --- > >> arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c | 4 ---- > >> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c > >> index 7e806f9..1fd30fa 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c > >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c > >> @@ -810,10 +810,6 @@ static int omap_dm_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> } > >> > >> mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > >> - if (unlikely(!mem)) { > >> - dev_err(dev, "%s: no memory resource.\n", __func__); > >> - return -ENODEV; > >> - } > >> > >> timer = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct omap_dm_timer), GFP_KERNEL); > >> if (!timer) { > > > > We still need to return an error here and not try to continue though. > > We are returning an error if mem is NULL so the redundant check is > unnecessary: > > ... > timer->io_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, mem); > if (IS_ERR(timer->io_base)) > return PTR_ERR(timer->io_base); Why would you want to even continue omap_dm_timer_probe() further and allocate memory if platform_get_resource() fails? Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 05/07/2014 05:10 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> [140507 14:53]: >> On 05/07/2014 10:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> [140424 14:44]: >>>> The subsequent devm_ioremap_resource will catch it and print an error, let it >>>> be checked there. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c | 4 ---- >>>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c >>>> index 7e806f9..1fd30fa 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c >>>> @@ -810,10 +810,6 @@ static int omap_dm_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>> } >>>> >>>> mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); >>>> - if (unlikely(!mem)) { >>>> - dev_err(dev, "%s: no memory resource.\n", __func__); >>>> - return -ENODEV; >>>> - } >>>> >>>> timer = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct omap_dm_timer), GFP_KERNEL); >>>> if (!timer) { >>> >>> We still need to return an error here and not try to continue though. >> >> We are returning an error if mem is NULL so the redundant check is >> unnecessary: >> >> ... >> timer->io_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, mem); >> if (IS_ERR(timer->io_base)) >> return PTR_ERR(timer->io_base); > > Why would you want to even continue omap_dm_timer_probe() > further and allocate memory if platform_get_resource() fails? > But its freed anyway on error. I just felt that extra LOC could be removed. Ideally we should do something like mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); io_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, mem); if (IS_ERR(io_base)) return PTR_ERR(io_base); timer = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct omap_dm_timer), GFP_KERNEL); if (!timer) { ... } timer->io_base = io_base; That combines the platform_get_resource and devm_ioremap_resource error paths into 1 path and avoids redundant checks.. I can do it this way, or if you want drop the patch entirely, I'm OK with it both ways.. thanks, -Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> [140507 15:15]: > On 05/07/2014 05:10 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> [140507 14:53]: > >> On 05/07/2014 10:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>> * Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> [140424 14:44]: > >>>> The subsequent devm_ioremap_resource will catch it and print an error, let it > >>>> be checked there. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> > >>>> --- > >>>> arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c | 4 ---- > >>>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c > >>>> index 7e806f9..1fd30fa 100644 > >>>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c > >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c > >>>> @@ -810,10 +810,6 @@ static int omap_dm_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > >>>> - if (unlikely(!mem)) { > >>>> - dev_err(dev, "%s: no memory resource.\n", __func__); > >>>> - return -ENODEV; > >>>> - } > >>>> > >>>> timer = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct omap_dm_timer), GFP_KERNEL); > >>>> if (!timer) { > >>> > >>> We still need to return an error here and not try to continue though. > >> > >> We are returning an error if mem is NULL so the redundant check is > >> unnecessary: > >> > >> ... > >> timer->io_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, mem); > >> if (IS_ERR(timer->io_base)) > >> return PTR_ERR(timer->io_base); > > > > Why would you want to even continue omap_dm_timer_probe() > > further and allocate memory if platform_get_resource() fails? > > > > But its freed anyway on error. I just felt that extra LOC could be > removed. Ideally we should do something like > > > mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > io_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, mem); > if (IS_ERR(io_base)) > return PTR_ERR(io_base); > > timer = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct omap_dm_timer), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!timer) { > ... > } > timer->io_base = io_base; > > > That combines the platform_get_resource and devm_ioremap_resource error > paths into 1 path and avoids redundant checks.. I can do it this way, or > if you want drop the patch entirely, I'm OK with it both ways.. Just drop the dev_err if anything. Removing error checking from function calls is always going to cause people to wonder what's going on. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c index 7e806f9..1fd30fa 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c @@ -810,10 +810,6 @@ static int omap_dm_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); - if (unlikely(!mem)) { - dev_err(dev, "%s: no memory resource.\n", __func__); - return -ENODEV; - } timer = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct omap_dm_timer), GFP_KERNEL); if (!timer) {
The subsequent devm_ioremap_resource will catch it and print an error, let it be checked there. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com> --- arch/arm/plat-omap/dmtimer.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)