Message ID | 1400576675-25265-5-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 05/20/2014 11:04 AM, Antoine Ténart wrote: > The Marvell Berlin AHCI has all his specific in the PHY driver. It then > only need to use the libahci functions to work properly. If it is that generic, .. > Add its compatible into the libahci_platform driver. > > Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> > --- > drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c > index ef67e79944f9..bc050aabf206 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c > @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", }, > { .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", }, > { .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", }, > + { .compatible = "marvell,berlin-ahci", }, .. why have a Marvell-specific compatible? How about "generic-ahci" instead, like we have for other fooHCIs already? Sebastian > {}, > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ahci_of_match); >
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:18:11AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 05/20/2014 11:04 AM, Antoine Ténart wrote: > >The Marvell Berlin AHCI has all his specific in the PHY driver. It then > >only need to use the libahci functions to work properly. > > If it is that generic, .. > > >Add its compatible into the libahci_platform driver. > > > >Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> > >--- > > drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c > >index ef67e79944f9..bc050aabf206 100644 > >--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c > >+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c > >@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = { > > { .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", }, > > { .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", }, > > { .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", }, > >+ { .compatible = "marvell,berlin-ahci", }, > > .. why have a Marvell-specific compatible? Well, the 3 other compatibles seemed as generic as the marvell one. Just following what was done before here. > How about "generic-ahci" instead, like we have for other fooHCIs > already? That would avoid an endless list of compatibles :) Antoine
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c index ef67e79944f9..bc050aabf206 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = { { .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", }, { .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", }, { .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", }, + { .compatible = "marvell,berlin-ahci", }, {}, }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ahci_of_match);
The Marvell Berlin AHCI has all his specific in the PHY driver. It then only need to use the libahci functions to work properly. Add its compatible into the libahci_platform driver. Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> --- drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)