diff mbox

[v4,4/7] ata: ahci_platform: add the Marvell Berlin AHCI compatible

Message ID 1400576675-25265-5-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Antoine Tenart May 20, 2014, 9:04 a.m. UTC
The Marvell Berlin AHCI has all his specific in the PHY driver. It then
only need to use the libahci functions to work properly.

Add its compatible into the libahci_platform driver.

Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Sebastian Hesselbarth May 20, 2014, 9:18 a.m. UTC | #1
On 05/20/2014 11:04 AM, Antoine Ténart wrote:
> The Marvell Berlin AHCI has all his specific in the PHY driver. It then
> only need to use the libahci functions to work properly.

If it is that generic, ..

> Add its compatible into the libahci_platform driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>   drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> index ef67e79944f9..bc050aabf206 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = {
>   	{ .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", },
>   	{ .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", },
>   	{ .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", },
> +	{ .compatible = "marvell,berlin-ahci", },

.. why have a Marvell-specific compatible?

How about "generic-ahci" instead, like we have for other fooHCIs
already?

Sebastian

>   	{},
>   };
>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ahci_of_match);
>
Antoine Tenart May 20, 2014, 9:23 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:18:11AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 05/20/2014 11:04 AM, Antoine Ténart wrote:
> >The Marvell Berlin AHCI has all his specific in the PHY driver. It then
> >only need to use the libahci functions to work properly.
> 
> If it is that generic, ..
> 
> >Add its compatible into the libahci_platform driver.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
> >---
> >  drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> >index ef67e79944f9..bc050aabf206 100644
> >--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> >+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> >@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", },
> >  	{ .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", },
> >  	{ .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", },
> >+	{ .compatible = "marvell,berlin-ahci", },
> 
> .. why have a Marvell-specific compatible?

Well, the 3 other compatibles seemed as generic as the marvell one. Just
following what was done before here.

> How about "generic-ahci" instead, like we have for other fooHCIs
> already?

That would avoid an endless list of compatibles :)

Antoine
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
index ef67e79944f9..bc050aabf206 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@  static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", },
 	{ .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", },
 	{ .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", },
+	{ .compatible = "marvell,berlin-ahci", },
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ahci_of_match);