Message ID | 1400182902.11786.21.camel@x220 (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
* Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> [140515 12:42]: > A check for CONFIG_SX1_OLD_FLASH was added in v2.6.24. But the related > Kconfig symbol was never part of the tree. So we can remove some dead > code. Thanks applying into omap-for-v3.16/board. Tony
On Fri 2014-05-16 14:12:31, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> [140515 12:42]: > > A check for CONFIG_SX1_OLD_FLASH was added in v2.6.24. But the related > > Kconfig symbol was never part of the tree. So we can remove some dead > > code. > > Thanks applying into omap-for-v3.16/board. Actually... It seems there are two variant of SX1, and this is very useful piece of documentation how the _other_ variant looks. And if someone is hacking linux on sx1, he can probably figure out #ifdef in .c file... IOW adding the config option might be better solution. Pavel
* Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> [140529 12:03]: > On Fri 2014-05-16 14:12:31, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> [140515 12:42]: > > > A check for CONFIG_SX1_OLD_FLASH was added in v2.6.24. But the related > > > Kconfig symbol was never part of the tree. So we can remove some dead > > > code. > > > > Thanks applying into omap-for-v3.16/board. > > Actually... It seems there are two variant of SX1, and this is very > useful piece of documentation how the _other_ variant looks. > > And if someone is hacking linux on sx1, he can probably figure out > #ifdef in .c file... > > IOW adding the config option might be better solution. Or just a comment saying the same? Regards, Tony
On Thu 2014-05-29 12:17:39, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> [140529 12:03]: > > On Fri 2014-05-16 14:12:31, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> [140515 12:42]: > > > > A check for CONFIG_SX1_OLD_FLASH was added in v2.6.24. But the related > > > > Kconfig symbol was never part of the tree. So we can remove some dead > > > > code. > > > > > > Thanks applying into omap-for-v3.16/board. > > > > Actually... It seems there are two variant of SX1, and this is very > > useful piece of documentation how the _other_ variant looks. > > > > And if someone is hacking linux on sx1, he can probably figure out > > #ifdef in .c file... > > > > IOW adding the config option might be better solution. > > Or just a comment saying the same? Yes, #if 0 with a comment would do the same trick. Pavel
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-sx1.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-sx1.c index 0a8d3349149c..29e526235dc2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-sx1.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-sx1.c @@ -266,31 +266,6 @@ static struct physmap_flash_data sx1_flash_data = { .nr_parts = ARRAY_SIZE(sx1_partitions), }; -#ifdef CONFIG_SX1_OLD_FLASH -/* MTD Intel StrataFlash - old flashes */ -static struct resource sx1_old_flash_resource[] = { - [0] = { - .start = OMAP_CS0_PHYS, /* Physical */ - .end = OMAP_CS0_PHYS + SZ_16M - 1,, - .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM, - }, - [1] = { - .start = OMAP_CS1_PHYS, - .end = OMAP_CS1_PHYS + SZ_8M - 1, - .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM, - }, -}; - -static struct platform_device sx1_flash_device = { - .name = "physmap-flash", - .id = 0, - .dev = { - .platform_data = &sx1_flash_data, - }, - .num_resources = 2, - .resource = &sx1_old_flash_resource, -}; -#else /* MTD Intel 4000 flash - new flashes */ static struct resource sx1_new_flash_resource = { .start = OMAP_CS0_PHYS, @@ -307,7 +282,6 @@ static struct platform_device sx1_flash_device = { .num_resources = 1, .resource = &sx1_new_flash_resource, }; -#endif /*----------- USB -------------------------*/
A check for CONFIG_SX1_OLD_FLASH was added in v2.6.24. But the related Kconfig symbol was never part of the tree. So we can remove some dead code. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> --- Also untested. arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-sx1.c | 26 -------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-)