Message ID | 1402673891-14618-20-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:37:37PM +0100, oscar.mateo@intel.com wrote: > From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> > > I plan to reuse these for the new logical ring path. > > No functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> I don't see the new user of this yet, but imo copy-pasting this around wouldn't be too harmful. -Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index 4a71dd4..254e4c5 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -574,8 +574,21 @@ out: > return ret; > } > > -static int > -init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > +void > +intel_fini_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > +{ > + if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) > + return; > + > + kunmap(sg_page(ring->scratch.obj->pages->sgl)); > + i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ring->scratch.obj); > + > + drm_gem_object_unreference(&ring->scratch.obj->base); > + ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > +} > + > +int > +intel_init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > { > int ret; > > @@ -648,7 +661,7 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GFX_REPLAY_MODE)); > > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) { > - ret = init_pipe_control(ring); > + ret = intel_init_pipe_control(ring); > if (ret) > return ret; > } > @@ -676,16 +689,8 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > { > struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; > > - if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) > - return; > - > - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) { > - kunmap(sg_page(ring->scratch.obj->pages->sgl)); > - i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ring->scratch.obj); > - } > - > - drm_gem_object_unreference(&ring->scratch.obj->base); > - ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) > + intel_fini_pipe_control(ring); > } > > static int gen6_signal(struct intel_engine_cs *signaller, > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > index 599b4ed..42026a1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > @@ -221,6 +221,9 @@ struct intel_engine_cs { > > bool intel_ring_initialized(struct intel_engine_cs *ring); > > +void intel_fini_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring); > +int intel_init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring); > + > static inline unsigned > intel_ring_flag(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > { > -- > 1.9.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:37:37AM -0700, oscar.mateo@intel.com wrote: > From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> > > I plan to reuse these for the new logical ring path. > > No functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index 4a71dd4..254e4c5 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -574,8 +574,21 @@ out: > return ret; > } > > -static int > -init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > +void > +intel_fini_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > +{ > + if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) > + return; > + > + kunmap(sg_page(ring->scratch.obj->pages->sgl)); > + i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ring->scratch.obj); > + > + drm_gem_object_unreference(&ring->scratch.obj->base); > + ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > +} > + > +int > +intel_init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > { > int ret; > > @@ -648,7 +661,7 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GFX_REPLAY_MODE)); > > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) { > - ret = init_pipe_control(ring); > + ret = intel_init_pipe_control(ring); > if (ret) > return ret; > } > @@ -676,16 +689,8 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > { > struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; > > - if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) > - return; > - > - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) { > - kunmap(sg_page(ring->scratch.obj->pages->sgl)); > - i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ring->scratch.obj); > - } > - > - drm_gem_object_unreference(&ring->scratch.obj->base); > - ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) > + intel_fini_pipe_control(ring); It looks like we've changed the behavior such that for the case of scratch.obj != NULL && gen < 5, we don't unreference scratch.obj. I don't know if we can ever hit that case though. Brad > } > > static int gen6_signal(struct intel_engine_cs *signaller, > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > index 599b4ed..42026a1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h > @@ -221,6 +221,9 @@ struct intel_engine_cs { > > bool intel_ring_initialized(struct intel_engine_cs *ring); > > +void intel_fini_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring); > +int intel_init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring); > + > static inline unsigned > intel_ring_flag(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > { > -- > 1.9.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> -----Original Message----- > From: Volkin, Bradley D > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 1:04 AM > To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/53] drm/i915: Extract pipe control fini & > make init outside accesible > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:37:37AM -0700, oscar.mateo@intel.com wrote: > > From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> > > > > I plan to reuse these for the new logical ring path. > > > > No functional changes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 31 > > ++++++++++++++++++------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 3 +++ > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > index 4a71dd4..254e4c5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > > @@ -574,8 +574,21 @@ out: > > return ret; > > } > > > > -static int > > -init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > > +void > > +intel_fini_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) { > > + if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) > > + return; > > + > > + kunmap(sg_page(ring->scratch.obj->pages->sgl)); > > + i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ring->scratch.obj); > > + > > + drm_gem_object_unreference(&ring->scratch.obj->base); > > + ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > > +} > > + > > +int > > +intel_init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > > { > > int ret; > > > > @@ -648,7 +661,7 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_engine_cs > *ring) > > _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GFX_REPLAY_MODE)); > > > > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) { > > - ret = init_pipe_control(ring); > > + ret = intel_init_pipe_control(ring); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > } > > @@ -676,16 +689,8 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct > > intel_engine_cs *ring) { > > struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; > > > > - if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) > > - return; > > - > > - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) { > > - kunmap(sg_page(ring->scratch.obj->pages->sgl)); > > - i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ring->scratch.obj); > > - } > > - > > - drm_gem_object_unreference(&ring->scratch.obj->base); > > - ring->scratch.obj = NULL; > > + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) > > + intel_fini_pipe_control(ring); > > It looks like we've changed the behavior such that for the case of scratch.obj > != NULL && gen < 5, we don't unreference scratch.obj. > I don't know if we can ever hit that case though. I think you´re right, what was I thinking? :( Thanks for the heads up!
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index 4a71dd4..254e4c5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -574,8 +574,21 @@ out: return ret; } -static int -init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) +void +intel_fini_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) +{ + if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) + return; + + kunmap(sg_page(ring->scratch.obj->pages->sgl)); + i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ring->scratch.obj); + + drm_gem_object_unreference(&ring->scratch.obj->base); + ring->scratch.obj = NULL; +} + +int +intel_init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) { int ret; @@ -648,7 +661,7 @@ static int init_render_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GFX_REPLAY_MODE)); if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) { - ret = init_pipe_control(ring); + ret = intel_init_pipe_control(ring); if (ret) return ret; } @@ -676,16 +689,8 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) { struct drm_device *dev = ring->dev; - if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) - return; - - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) { - kunmap(sg_page(ring->scratch.obj->pages->sgl)); - i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ring->scratch.obj); - } - - drm_gem_object_unreference(&ring->scratch.obj->base); - ring->scratch.obj = NULL; + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) + intel_fini_pipe_control(ring); } static int gen6_signal(struct intel_engine_cs *signaller, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h index 599b4ed..42026a1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h @@ -221,6 +221,9 @@ struct intel_engine_cs { bool intel_ring_initialized(struct intel_engine_cs *ring); +void intel_fini_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring); +int intel_init_pipe_control(struct intel_engine_cs *ring); + static inline unsigned intel_ring_flag(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) {