Message ID | 1406828534-10072-15-git-send-email-ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:12:13PM +0530, Ajay Kumar wrote: > Add commit callback for exynos_dp, and move the DP link training, > video configuration code from the hotplug handler into commit(). > > Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) This is not related to the other patches in the series, so it can be applied independently. Sean, this looks like a back-/forward-port of the patch you linked to in reply to an earlier version of the series, does this still correspond to what you think it should be doing? (hence not trimming the quote) Thierry > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > index 31c3de9..347dec9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c > @@ -875,10 +875,18 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_dp_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg) > static void exynos_dp_hotplug(struct work_struct *work) > { > struct exynos_dp_device *dp; > - int ret; > > dp = container_of(work, struct exynos_dp_device, hotplug_work); > > + if (dp->drm_dev) > + drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(dp->drm_dev); > +} > + > +static void exynos_dp_commit(struct exynos_drm_display *display) > +{ > + struct exynos_dp_device *dp = display->ctx; > + int ret; > + > ret = exynos_dp_detect_hpd(dp); > if (ret) { > /* Cable has been disconnected, we're done */ > @@ -1050,8 +1058,10 @@ static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) > } > } > > -static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) > +static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display) > { > + struct exynos_dp_device *dp = display->ctx; > + > if (dp->dpms_mode == DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) > return; > > @@ -1059,10 +1069,13 @@ static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) > exynos_dp_phy_init(dp); > exynos_dp_init_dp(dp); > enable_irq(dp->irq); > + exynos_dp_commit(display); > } > > -static void exynos_dp_poweroff(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) > +static void exynos_dp_poweroff(struct exynos_drm_display *display) > { > + struct exynos_dp_device *dp = display->ctx; > + > if (dp->dpms_mode != DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) > return; > > @@ -1078,12 +1091,12 @@ static void exynos_dp_dpms(struct exynos_drm_display *display, int mode) > > switch (mode) { > case DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON: > - exynos_dp_poweron(dp); > + exynos_dp_poweron(display); > break; > case DRM_MODE_DPMS_STANDBY: > case DRM_MODE_DPMS_SUSPEND: > case DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF: > - exynos_dp_poweroff(dp); > + exynos_dp_poweroff(display); > break; > default: > break; > @@ -1094,6 +1107,7 @@ static void exynos_dp_dpms(struct exynos_drm_display *display, int mode) > static struct exynos_drm_display_ops exynos_dp_display_ops = { > .create_connector = exynos_dp_create_connector, > .dpms = exynos_dp_dpms, > + .commit = exynos_dp_commit, > }; > > static struct exynos_drm_display exynos_dp_display = { > -- > 1.7.9.5 >
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:12:13PM +0530, Ajay Kumar wrote: >> Add commit callback for exynos_dp, and move the DP link training, >> video configuration code from the hotplug handler into commit(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> >> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > This is not related to the other patches in the series, so it can be > applied independently. This patch should go in this series only. [PATCH 15/15] has dependency on this because it modifies exynos_dp_commit(). > Sean, this looks like a back-/forward-port of the patch you linked to in > reply to an earlier version of the series, does this still correspond to > what you think it should be doing? (hence not trimming the quote) Sean said one of his test app fails since exynos_dp_commit was missing in previous version of this patch. Now, I have added exynos_dp_commit as he suggested, and the side effect because of this addition (video reconfiguration glitch) is taken care by the panel calls in the next patch [PATCH 15/15]. Ajay >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> index 31c3de9..347dec9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c >> @@ -875,10 +875,18 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_dp_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg) >> static void exynos_dp_hotplug(struct work_struct *work) >> { >> struct exynos_dp_device *dp; >> - int ret; >> >> dp = container_of(work, struct exynos_dp_device, hotplug_work); >> >> + if (dp->drm_dev) >> + drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(dp->drm_dev); >> +} >> + >> +static void exynos_dp_commit(struct exynos_drm_display *display) >> +{ >> + struct exynos_dp_device *dp = display->ctx; >> + int ret; >> + >> ret = exynos_dp_detect_hpd(dp); >> if (ret) { >> /* Cable has been disconnected, we're done */ >> @@ -1050,8 +1058,10 @@ static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> } >> } >> >> -static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> +static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display) >> { >> + struct exynos_dp_device *dp = display->ctx; >> + >> if (dp->dpms_mode == DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) >> return; >> >> @@ -1059,10 +1069,13 @@ static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> exynos_dp_phy_init(dp); >> exynos_dp_init_dp(dp); >> enable_irq(dp->irq); >> + exynos_dp_commit(display); >> } >> >> -static void exynos_dp_poweroff(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) >> +static void exynos_dp_poweroff(struct exynos_drm_display *display) >> { >> + struct exynos_dp_device *dp = display->ctx; >> + >> if (dp->dpms_mode != DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) >> return; >> >> @@ -1078,12 +1091,12 @@ static void exynos_dp_dpms(struct exynos_drm_display *display, int mode) >> >> switch (mode) { >> case DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON: >> - exynos_dp_poweron(dp); >> + exynos_dp_poweron(display); >> break; >> case DRM_MODE_DPMS_STANDBY: >> case DRM_MODE_DPMS_SUSPEND: >> case DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF: >> - exynos_dp_poweroff(dp); >> + exynos_dp_poweroff(display); >> break; >> default: >> break; >> @@ -1094,6 +1107,7 @@ static void exynos_dp_dpms(struct exynos_drm_display *display, int mode) >> static struct exynos_drm_display_ops exynos_dp_display_ops = { >> .create_connector = exynos_dp_create_connector, >> .dpms = exynos_dp_dpms, >> + .commit = exynos_dp_commit, >> }; >> >> static struct exynos_drm_display exynos_dp_display = { >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:11:37PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote: > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:12:13PM +0530, Ajay Kumar wrote: > >> Add commit callback for exynos_dp, and move the DP link training, > >> video configuration code from the hotplug handler into commit(). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> > >> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- > >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > This is not related to the other patches in the series, so it can be > > applied independently. > This patch should go in this series only. > [PATCH 15/15] has dependency on this because it modifies exynos_dp_commit(). Okay, I'll apply it to the panel tree. Inki, can I assume your Acked-by from patch 06/15 applies to this one as well? Thierry
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c index 31c3de9..347dec9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c @@ -875,10 +875,18 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_dp_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg) static void exynos_dp_hotplug(struct work_struct *work) { struct exynos_dp_device *dp; - int ret; dp = container_of(work, struct exynos_dp_device, hotplug_work); + if (dp->drm_dev) + drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(dp->drm_dev); +} + +static void exynos_dp_commit(struct exynos_drm_display *display) +{ + struct exynos_dp_device *dp = display->ctx; + int ret; + ret = exynos_dp_detect_hpd(dp); if (ret) { /* Cable has been disconnected, we're done */ @@ -1050,8 +1058,10 @@ static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) } } -static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) +static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display) { + struct exynos_dp_device *dp = display->ctx; + if (dp->dpms_mode == DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) return; @@ -1059,10 +1069,13 @@ static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) exynos_dp_phy_init(dp); exynos_dp_init_dp(dp); enable_irq(dp->irq); + exynos_dp_commit(display); } -static void exynos_dp_poweroff(struct exynos_dp_device *dp) +static void exynos_dp_poweroff(struct exynos_drm_display *display) { + struct exynos_dp_device *dp = display->ctx; + if (dp->dpms_mode != DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON) return; @@ -1078,12 +1091,12 @@ static void exynos_dp_dpms(struct exynos_drm_display *display, int mode) switch (mode) { case DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON: - exynos_dp_poweron(dp); + exynos_dp_poweron(display); break; case DRM_MODE_DPMS_STANDBY: case DRM_MODE_DPMS_SUSPEND: case DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF: - exynos_dp_poweroff(dp); + exynos_dp_poweroff(display); break; default: break; @@ -1094,6 +1107,7 @@ static void exynos_dp_dpms(struct exynos_drm_display *display, int mode) static struct exynos_drm_display_ops exynos_dp_display_ops = { .create_connector = exynos_dp_create_connector, .dpms = exynos_dp_dpms, + .commit = exynos_dp_commit, }; static struct exynos_drm_display exynos_dp_display = {