| Message ID | 20190110175845.1203986-1-lkundrak@v3.sk (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add support for OLPC XO 1.75 Embedded Controller | expand |
On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 18:58 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > Hello! > > This is a fifth spin of the patch set that adds support for the Embedded > Controller on an OLPC XO 1.75 machine. > > It notably removes the patches that adjust the battery driver -- those were > submitted to linux-pm separately [1]. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190110174005.1202564-1-lkundrak@v3.sk/T/#m9da9aee9e6482ee680a103280ebb769ebcbb32ef > > This DT bindings doc is pretty much independent of the above: > > [01/10] dt-bindings: olpc,xo1.75-ec: Add OLPC XO-1.75 EC > > The OLPC EC changes follow. Cleanups first, then functionality: > > [02/10] Platform: OLPC: Remove an unused include > [03/10] Platform: OLPC: Move EC-specific functionality out from > [04/10] Platform: OLPC: Avoid a warning if the EC didn't > [05/10] Platform: OLPC: Use BIT() and GENMASK() for event masks > [06/10] Platform: OLPC: Add XO-1.75 EC driver > [07/10] Platform: OLPC: Add a regulator for the DCON > > The patch 08/10 only makes sense once both the above and the XO 1.75 > battery support is merged, otherwise enabling CONFIG_BATTERY_OLPC on > ARM would break build. > > [08/10] power: supply: olpc_battery: Allow building the driver > > The restart support has been split off, because there's a possibility it > needs to be reworked: the arm_pm_restart export patch was objected to: > > [09/10] ARM: export arm_pm_restart > [10/10] Platform: OLPC: Add restart support to XO-1.75 EC > > Tested to work on an OLPC XO 1.75 and also tested not to break x86 > support with an OLPC XO 1 machine. I don't have a XO 1.5, but it's > unlikely this breaks it when XO 1 works. Hello Andy & Darren, I'm wondering if there's anything more I need to do in order for the patches 01-07 to be queued for 5.1? I believe I addressed the issues that were pointed out and I believe the patch set is already in a good shape. Thanks, Lubo
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 1:46 PM Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk> wrote: > Hello Andy & Darren, > > I'm wondering if there's anything more I need to do in order for the > patches 01-07 to be queued for 5.1? I believe I addressed the issues > that were pointed out and I believe the patch set is already in a good > shape. I remember Darren did some review and according to patch work he is in charge. I dunno what Darren's plans are, but if I need to look at this series, it will require some time and may miss v5.1.