Message ID | 20190527121348.45251-1-tony@atomide.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ti-sysc driver changes to drop custom hwmods property | expand |
On 27/05/19 5:43 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi all, > > Here are changes to improve ti-sysc driver to the point where we can > finally drop the custom hwmods property for most cases. This series > drops hwmods property only for omap4 UART and MMC as those can be > tested with core retention idle. > > I'll be posting more patches for dropping hwmods properties as they > get tested. Tony, What is the base of this series? It does not apply cleanly neither on linux-next nor on top of 5.2->rc1. If there are dependencies do you have a branch? - Keerthy > > Regards, > > Tony > > > Tony Lindgren (12): > bus: ti-sysc: Support 16-bit writes too > bus: ti-sysc: Make OCP reset work for sysstatus and sysconfig reset > bits > bus: ti-sysc: Allow QUIRK_LEGACY_IDLE even if legacy_mode is not set > bus: ti-sysc: Enable interconnect target module autoidle bit on enable > bus: ti-sysc: Handle clockactivity for enable and disable > bus: ti-sysc: Handle swsup idle mode quirks > bus: ti-sysc: Set ENAWAKEUP if available > bus: ti-sysc: Add support for disabling module without legacy mode > bus: ti-sysc: Do rstctrl reset handling in two phases > bus: ti-sysc: Detect uarts also on omap34xx > ARM: dts: Drop legacy custom hwmods property for omap4 uart > ARM: dts: Drop legacy custom hwmods property for omap4 mmc > > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4-l4.dtsi | 9 -- > drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++++------ > include/linux/platform_data/ti-sysc.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) >
* Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> [190528 00:58]: > > > On 27/05/19 5:43 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here are changes to improve ti-sysc driver to the point where we can > > finally drop the custom hwmods property for most cases. This series > > drops hwmods property only for omap4 UART and MMC as those can be > > tested with core retention idle. > > > > I'll be posting more patches for dropping hwmods properties as they > > get tested. > > Tony, > > What is the base of this series? It does not apply cleanly neither on > linux-next nor on top of 5.2->rc1. If there are dependencies do you have a > branch? Oh thanks for letting me know. It's against v5.2-rc1 but the first patch of the series got accidentally left out. Looks like I used -n option with git format-patch with -n 12 instead of -n13. I will repost the series. Regards, Tony