[v3,0/4] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: use of_data and add dma-channel-mask support

Message

Yoshihiro Shimoda Sept. 9, 2019, 6:34 a.m. UTC

This patch series is based on the latest slave-dma.git / next branch.

Changes from v2:
 - Rebase the latest slave-dma.git / next branch (In other words,
   this patch series doesn't depend any other branches.
 - Cherry-picked a patch which is contained in v5.3-rc8 to solve any
   dependency. (I'm not sure whether this is a right way or not...)
  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=169317

Changes from v1:
 - Combine two patch series into this patch series.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=166457&state=*
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=166457&state=*
 - Remove a patch because updated patch is already merged into
   the latest slave-dma.git / fixes branch as described above.
 - Add Reviewed-by tags into all patches.
 - Rename a member of rcar_dmac_of_data.
 - Just ignore the return value of of_property_read_u32() for dma-channel-mask.


Yoshihiro Shimoda (4):
  dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Fix DMACHCLR handling if iommu is mapped
  dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Use of_data values instead of a macro
  dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
  dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support

 drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Comments

Vinod Koul Oct. 14, 2019, 6:58 a.m. UTC | #1

On 09-09-19, 15:34, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> This patch series is based on the latest slave-dma.git / next branch.
> 
> Changes from v2:
>  - Rebase the latest slave-dma.git / next branch (In other words,
>    this patch series doesn't depend any other branches.
>  - Cherry-picked a patch which is contained in v5.3-rc8 to solve any
>    dependency. (I'm not sure whether this is a right way or not...)
>   https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=169317

Sorry for delay, I was on vacation + conference. Yeah ideally I would
merge fixes and this wouldn't be the case.

patch1 is no longer needed now, I have applied the rest

Thanks