[0/6] Various exfat fixes
mbox series

Message ID 20191009133157.14028-1-philipp.ammann@posteo.de
Headers show
Series
  • Various exfat fixes
Related show

Message

Philipp Ammann Oct. 9, 2019, 1:31 p.m. UTC
From: Philipp Ammann <philipp.ammann@posteo.de>

These patches are not mine; they are pulled from Github:

  https://github.com/dorimanx/exfat-nofuse/pull/124

Supposedly they're from Samsung.

I've been running them on 4.19 for about over a year without issues.

I know the commit messages are not exactly stellar. Please excuse my
not improving them, but I'm no filesystem guy.

Cheers
  Philipp

Andreas Schneider (6):
  Return a valid count in count_used_clusters()
  Add missing fs_error() in sector functions
  Check that the new path while moving a file is not too long
  Add the exfat version to the module info
  Sync blocks on remount
  Add device ejected to mount options

 drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c  | 19 +++++++++++++++----
 drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c |  9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Nikolay Borisov Oct. 9, 2019, 5:36 p.m. UTC | #1
On 9.10.19 г. 16:31 ч., philipp.ammann@posteo.de wrote:
> From: Philipp Ammann <philipp.ammann@posteo.de>
> 
> These patches are not mine; they are pulled from Github:
> 
>   https://github.com/dorimanx/exfat-nofuse/pull/124
> 
> Supposedly they're from Samsung.
> 
> I've been running them on 4.19 for about over a year without issues.
> 
> I know the commit messages are not exactly stellar. Please excuse my
> not improving them, but I'm no filesystem guy.
> 
> Cheers
>   Philipp
> 
> Andreas Schneider (6):
>   Return a valid count in count_used_clusters()
>   Add missing fs_error() in sector functions
>   Check that the new path while moving a file is not too long
>   Add the exfat version to the module info
>   Sync blocks on remount
>   Add device ejected to mount options
> 
>  drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_core.c  | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c |  9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 


From the same pull :

"
No, please use kernel-sdfat. It shouldn't be very hard to get it working
on 4.18. exfat-nofuse has a lot of issues, don't use it.
"
Philipp Ammann Oct. 9, 2019, 5:38 p.m. UTC | #2
Am 09.10.19 um 19:36 schrieb Nikolay Borisov:
>  From the same pull :
> 
> "
> No, please use kernel-sdfat. It shouldn't be very hard to get it working
> on 4.18. exfat-nofuse has a lot of issues, don't use it.
> "
> 

...which is this discussion here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/15/135
The version in mainline is exfat, not sdfat.