Message ID | 20191218011925.19428-1-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=fY3M=2I=vger.kernel.org=linux-btrfs-owner@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55ECB139A for <patchwork-linux-btrfs@patchwork.kernel.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 01:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305D92176D for <patchwork-linux-btrfs@patchwork.kernel.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 01:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="A1T3I4uH" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726454AbfLRBRH (ORCPT <rfc822;patchwork-linux-btrfs@patchwork.kernel.org>); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 20:17:07 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com ([209.85.128.52]:53506 "EHLO mail-wm1-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726227AbfLRBRH (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 20:17:07 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id m24so101703wmc.3 for <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:17:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1dW0EZ3t3h+5kPOELNcAo3OQFCBYuhAA+qezRZC+fzk=; b=A1T3I4uHLUuHe2CMtXqzmAfqhtkJ3SHAMNJDWULnGQSlffB1KLpd3Y2CiW8AQkDoLZ Ojy4alj6q/tKhf5KMoXyhXF1tGWClxFiqZO8XDHxLmEcjG+XBwH8t6VXGH/KpjabyizA 3kUGt30lCHN/NtIQaoUZR7Xe8g2JU0pxwdcgFynUDXbCb8ZGtMav9ReQH9YtFLTVwlyb UAo5blsDtB70w2q18P7QpanHWYdJUrG3tQZYLM1IZa9vfJ6iDflwiAyCJzBh3emmgCnf zfVUsDBKGCLlGE6KJavZxtyOldRiWmAG0E1SlvyyVO0Jx8ZIqakldCw1XqfCzcy4IUZl /hZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1dW0EZ3t3h+5kPOELNcAo3OQFCBYuhAA+qezRZC+fzk=; b=j1XLu9/echdub4hurc51id5e7xq64DQFS3drF3iIbMfHvHF8a0tq4IGY8c8X8owMcs Gqdi3a1szbaEagjbDvxmN1WUeacxkrFezBtMV4TnIAtBgbZDhk8tX+5GoaKEdEkh4rYD NXd1QRGcfBL6WmapI69KHnqbiSsSEyBf0TFm+vxTsZee4hu8IH9wjBHWJI902xGL+waG Wtv0CJs/jv7DhA2gaSy7wQBmSVCyaZDAzPf+9kqFltEF5CWRO2e5bBykP1z+Sxz+Jyhu d2rq3cNLjf/76BOaR3i0aq2P2JxsdxBd0yaikCJVCA+PwU8VNOUNE4oiaj003+bDYUy9 bMRA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXJ2PtLgn8Wlnfpb684GUqDh+L+5vjiP/1RLi1ZFvcj5o4DoTC0 XAwSKJCoAEN0Ch7M6h9iaJLc/0ln X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwmEiHSNy+PKhXAW4a9M04Nyc0Th6qIRV/PTOZmKoq/hfN5SsI9NelYIUGHg3VILj+mwjCZsw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a9c6:: with SMTP id s189mr17280wme.151.1576631825272; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:17:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from hephaestus.suse.de ([179.185.209.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g25sm4782854wmh.3.2019.12.17.17.17.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:17:04 -0800 (PST) From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@gmail.com> Cc: dsterba@suse.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>, wqu@suse.com Subject: [btrfs-progs PATCHv2 0/4] tests: do not fail if dm-thin is missing Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 22:19:21 -0300 Message-Id: <20191218011925.19428-1-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org |
Series |
tests: do not fail if dm-thin is missing
|
expand
|
From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Hi there, This is a v2 of the patches which basically changes the first patch and adds Reviewed-by to other reviewed patches. The change in the first patch was to remove the SUDO_HELPER variable from check_dm_target_support, since nowadays everyone executes these tests using root. Original message: these patchset is trying to fix the issue 192[1] by checking if dm-thin exists, and if it's not available, skip the test. In the last patch, the same is done for dmsetup. Feel free to ignore the last patch if you think we should stop the tests if dmsetup isn't available. Thanks! [1]: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/192 Marcos Paulo de Souza (4): tests: common: Add check_dm_target_support helper tests: mkfs: 017: Use check_dm_target_support helper tests: mkfs: 005: Use check_dm_target_support helper tests: Do not fail is dmsetup is missing tests/common | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ .../005-long-device-name-for-ssd/test.sh | 2 +- .../test.sh | 2 +- 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)