| Message ID | 1511956946-16667-1-git-send-email-yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:02:26PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: > If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and > mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return > EBUSY instead of pass. > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> As we have blktests[1] now, I think this may fit in blktests better? Thanks, Eryu [1] https://github.com/osandov/blktests > --- > tests/generic/473 | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/generic/473.out | 2 ++ > tests/generic/group | 1 + > 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 tests/generic/473 > create mode 100644 tests/generic/473.out > > diff --git a/tests/generic/473 b/tests/generic/473 > new file mode 100755 > index 0000000..d7998cd > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/generic/473 > @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ > +#! /bin/bash > +# FS QA Test No. 473 > +# > +# Regression test for commit: > +# 77032ca ("Return EBUSY from BLKRRPART for mounted whole-dev fs") > +# > +# If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and > +# mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return > +# EBUSY. On buggy kernel, it passes unexpectedly. > +# > +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- > +# Copyright (c) 2017 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved. > +# Author: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> > +# > +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as > +# published by the Free Software Foundation. > +# > +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, > +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > +# GNU General Public License for more details. > +# > +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, > +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA > +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- > +# > + > +seq=`basename $0` > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq > +echo "QA output created by $seq" > + > +here=`pwd` > +tmpdir=`mktemp -d` > +status=1 # failure is the default! > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 7 15 > + > +_cleanup() > +{ > + # Umount > + $UMOUNT_PROG $tmpdir >>$seqres.full 2>&1 > + # Destroy device > + _put_scsi_debug_dev > + rm -rf $tmpdir > +} > + > +# get standard environment, filters and checks > +. ./common/rc > +. ./common/scsi_debug > + > +# remove previous $seqres.full before test > +rm -f $seqres.full > + > +# real QA test starts here > +_supported_os Linux > +_require_scsi_debug > + > +# Create and format > +test_dev=`_get_scsi_debug_dev` > +_mkfs_dev $test_dev >>$seqres.full 2>&1 > + > +# Mount and check mounted whole-dev > +_mount $test_dev $tmpdir > + > +out=$(blockdev --rereadpt $test_dev 2>&1) > +res=$? > + > +echo $out | grep -q "Unknown command" && \ > + _notrun "blockdev --rereadpt was not supported" > + > +[ $res -eq 0 ] && _fail "blockdev --rereadpt passed when checking mounted whole-dev" > + > +echo $out | grep -q "Device or resource busy" || \ > + _fail "blockdev --rereadpt returned unexpected error when checking mounted whole-dev" > + > +echo $out >> $seqres.full > + > +echo "Silence is golden" > + > +# success, all done > +status=0 > +exit > diff --git a/tests/generic/473.out b/tests/generic/473.out > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..854fbcd > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/generic/473.out > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > +QA output created by 473 > +Silence is golden > diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group > index 6c3bb03..54b9404 100644 > --- a/tests/generic/group > +++ b/tests/generic/group > @@ -472,3 +472,4 @@ > 467 auto quick exportfs > 468 shutdown auto quick metadata > 469 auto quick > +473 auto quick blockdev > -- > 1.8.3.1 > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2017/12/04 16:29, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:02:26PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: >> If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and >> mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return >> EBUSY instead of pass. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> > As we have blktests[1] now, I think this may fit in blktests better? Hi Eryu, Do you think test cases which use scsi_debug module should be moved into blktests? (e.g. generic/108, generic/349, generic/350, generic/351) Thanks, Xiao Yang > Thanks, > Eryu > > [1] https://github.com/osandov/blktests > >> --- >> tests/generic/473 | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/generic/473.out | 2 ++ >> tests/generic/group | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+) >> create mode 100755 tests/generic/473 >> create mode 100644 tests/generic/473.out >> >> diff --git a/tests/generic/473 b/tests/generic/473 >> new file mode 100755 >> index 0000000..d7998cd >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tests/generic/473 >> @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ >> +#! /bin/bash >> +# FS QA Test No. 473 >> +# >> +# Regression test for commit: >> +# 77032ca ("Return EBUSY from BLKRRPART for mounted whole-dev fs") >> +# >> +# If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and >> +# mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return >> +# EBUSY. On buggy kernel, it passes unexpectedly. >> +# >> +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> +# Copyright (c) 2017 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved. >> +# Author: Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> >> +# >> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or >> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as >> +# published by the Free Software Foundation. >> +# >> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, >> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >> +# GNU General Public License for more details. >> +# >> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License >> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, >> +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA >> +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> +# >> + >> +seq=`basename $0` >> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq >> +echo "QA output created by $seq" >> + >> +here=`pwd` >> +tmpdir=`mktemp -d` >> +status=1 # failure is the default! >> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 7 15 >> + >> +_cleanup() >> +{ >> + # Umount >> + $UMOUNT_PROG $tmpdir>>$seqres.full 2>&1 >> + # Destroy device >> + _put_scsi_debug_dev >> + rm -rf $tmpdir >> +} >> + >> +# get standard environment, filters and checks >> +. ./common/rc >> +. ./common/scsi_debug >> + >> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test >> +rm -f $seqres.full >> + >> +# real QA test starts here >> +_supported_os Linux >> +_require_scsi_debug >> + >> +# Create and format >> +test_dev=`_get_scsi_debug_dev` >> +_mkfs_dev $test_dev>>$seqres.full 2>&1 >> + >> +# Mount and check mounted whole-dev >> +_mount $test_dev $tmpdir >> + >> +out=$(blockdev --rereadpt $test_dev 2>&1) >> +res=$? >> + >> +echo $out | grep -q "Unknown command"&& \ >> + _notrun "blockdev --rereadpt was not supported" >> + >> +[ $res -eq 0 ]&& _fail "blockdev --rereadpt passed when checking mounted whole-dev" >> + >> +echo $out | grep -q "Device or resource busy" || \ >> + _fail "blockdev --rereadpt returned unexpected error when checking mounted whole-dev" >> + >> +echo $out>> $seqres.full >> + >> +echo "Silence is golden" >> + >> +# success, all done >> +status=0 >> +exit >> diff --git a/tests/generic/473.out b/tests/generic/473.out >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..854fbcd >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tests/generic/473.out >> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ >> +QA output created by 473 >> +Silence is golden >> diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group >> index 6c3bb03..54b9404 100644 >> --- a/tests/generic/group >> +++ b/tests/generic/group >> @@ -472,3 +472,4 @@ >> 467 auto quick exportfs >> 468 shutdown auto quick metadata >> 469 auto quick >> +473 auto quick blockdev >> -- >> 1.8.3.1 >> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:15:17PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: > On 2017/12/04 16:29, Eryu Guan wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:02:26PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: > > > If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and > > > mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return > > > EBUSY instead of pass. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> > > As we have blktests[1] now, I think this may fit in blktests better? > Hi Eryu, > > Do you think test cases which use scsi_debug module should be moved into > blktests? > (e.g. generic/108, generic/349, generic/350, generic/351) I don't think they need to be moved to blktests. Most other tests that take use of scsi_debug are for filesystem testing, e.g. generic/108. generic/349 generic/35[01] are a bit special, they were there before blktests was announced available, so they're in a special blockdev group and not in the auto group. If Omar agrees, I think they can be ported to blktests. Thanks, Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2017/12/04 17:25, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:15:17PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: >> On 2017/12/04 16:29, Eryu Guan wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:02:26PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: >>>> If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and >>>> mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return >>>> EBUSY instead of pass. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> >>> As we have blktests[1] now, I think this may fit in blktests better? >> Hi Eryu, >> >> Do you think test cases which use scsi_debug module should be moved into >> blktests? >> (e.g. generic/108, generic/349, generic/350, generic/351) > I don't think they need to be moved to blktests. Most other tests that > take use of scsi_debug are for filesystem testing, e.g. generic/108. > generic/349 generic/35[01] are a bit special, they were there before > blktests was announced available, so they're in a special blockdev group > and not in the auto group. If Omar agrees, I think they can be ported to > blktests. Hi Eryu, Thanks for your explanation, and i will try to send it to blktests. Thanks, Xiao Yang > Thanks, > Eryu > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:48:36PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: > On 2017/12/04 17:25, Eryu Guan wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:15:17PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: > > > On 2017/12/04 16:29, Eryu Guan wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:02:26PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: > > > > > If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and > > > > > mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return > > > > > EBUSY instead of pass. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> > > > > As we have blktests[1] now, I think this may fit in blktests better? > > > Hi Eryu, > > > > > > Do you think test cases which use scsi_debug module should be moved into > > > blktests? > > > (e.g. generic/108, generic/349, generic/350, generic/351) > > I don't think they need to be moved to blktests. Most other tests that > > take use of scsi_debug are for filesystem testing, e.g. generic/108. > > generic/349 generic/35[01] are a bit special, they were there before > > blktests was announced available, so they're in a special blockdev group > > and not in the auto group. If Omar agrees, I think they can be ported to > > blktests. > Hi Eryu, > > Thanks for your explanation, and i will try to send it to blktests. > > Thanks, > Xiao Yang I agree, the three tests Eryu mentioned and this new test would be a good fit for blktests. Let me know if you need any help porting, things are a little different from xfstests. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2017/12/05 2:29, Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:48:36PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: >> On 2017/12/04 17:25, Eryu Guan wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:15:17PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: >>>> On 2017/12/04 16:29, Eryu Guan wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:02:26PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote: >>>>>> If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and >>>>>> mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return >>>>>> EBUSY instead of pass. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> >>>>> As we have blktests[1] now, I think this may fit in blktests better? >>>> Hi Eryu, >>>> >>>> Do you think test cases which use scsi_debug module should be moved into >>>> blktests? >>>> (e.g. generic/108, generic/349, generic/350, generic/351) >>> I don't think they need to be moved to blktests. Most other tests that >>> take use of scsi_debug are for filesystem testing, e.g. generic/108. >>> generic/349 generic/35[01] are a bit special, they were there before >>> blktests was announced available, so they're in a special blockdev group >>> and not in the auto group. If Omar agrees, I think they can be ported to >>> blktests. >> Hi Eryu, >> >> Thanks for your explanation, and i will try to send it to blktests. >> >> Thanks, >> Xiao Yang > I agree, the three tests Eryu mentioned and this new test would be a > good fit for blktests. Let me know if you need any help porting, things > are a little different from xfstests. Hi Omar, With gcc v4.4.7 on RHEL6, i got the following compiler error: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [root@RHEL6U9GA_Intel64 blktests]# make make -C src all make[1]: Entering directory `/root/blktests/src' cc -Wall -o sg/syzkaller1 -O2 sg/syzkaller1.c sg/syzkaller1.c: In function ‘segv_handler’: sg/syzkaller1.c:118: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘__atomic_load_n’ sg/syzkaller1.c:118: error: ‘__ATOMIC_RELAXED’ undeclared (first use in this function) sg/syzkaller1.c:118: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once sg/syzkaller1.c:118: error: for each function it appears in.) sg/syzkaller1.c: In function ‘syz_open_dev’: sg/syzkaller1.c:204: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘__atomic_fetch_add’ sg/syzkaller1.c:204: error: ‘__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST’ undeclared (first use in this function) sg/syzkaller1.c:204: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘__atomic_fetch_sub’ sg/syzkaller1.c: In function ‘test’: sg/syzkaller1.c:406: error: ‘__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST’ undeclared (first use in this function) make[1]: *** [sg/syzkaller1] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/blktests/src' make: *** [all] Error 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It seems that __atomic_* functions are not available, and could you tell me how to fix the compiler error? Thanks, Xiao Yang > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> writes: > [root@RHEL6U9GA_Intel64 blktests]# make > make -C src all > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/blktests/src' > cc -Wall -o sg/syzkaller1 -O2 sg/syzkaller1.c > sg/syzkaller1.c: In function ‘segv_handler’: > sg/syzkaller1.c:118: warning: implicit declaration of function > ‘__atomic_load_n’ > sg/syzkaller1.c:118: error: ‘__ATOMIC_RELAXED’ undeclared (first use > in this function) > sg/syzkaller1.c:118: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported > only once > sg/syzkaller1.c:118: error: for each function it appears in.) > sg/syzkaller1.c: In function ‘syz_open_dev’: > sg/syzkaller1.c:204: warning: implicit declaration of function > ‘__atomic_fetch_add’ > sg/syzkaller1.c:204: error: ‘__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST’ undeclared (first use > in this function) > sg/syzkaller1.c:204: warning: implicit declaration of function > ‘__atomic_fetch_sub’ > sg/syzkaller1.c: In function ‘test’: > sg/syzkaller1.c:406: error: ‘__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST’ undeclared (first use > in this function) > make[1]: *** [sg/syzkaller1] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/blktests/src' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > It seems that __atomic_* functions are not available, and could you > tell me how to fix > the compiler error? It seems like gcc 4.4 is too old to handle __ATOMIC_*. The oldest version of gcc I tried was 4.8 which could handle this code perfectly fine. I think we need hacks in the makefile to see which compiler version we have and conditionally compile the code. Byte, Johannes
On 2017/12/19 18:53, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> writes: >> [root@RHEL6U9GA_Intel64 blktests]# make >> make -C src all >> make[1]: Entering directory `/root/blktests/src' >> cc -Wall -o sg/syzkaller1 -O2 sg/syzkaller1.c >> sg/syzkaller1.c: In function ‘segv_handler’: >> sg/syzkaller1.c:118: warning: implicit declaration of function >> ‘__atomic_load_n’ >> sg/syzkaller1.c:118: error: ‘__ATOMIC_RELAXED’ undeclared (first use >> in this function) >> sg/syzkaller1.c:118: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported >> only once >> sg/syzkaller1.c:118: error: for each function it appears in.) >> sg/syzkaller1.c: In function ‘syz_open_dev’: >> sg/syzkaller1.c:204: warning: implicit declaration of function >> ‘__atomic_fetch_add’ >> sg/syzkaller1.c:204: error: ‘__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST’ undeclared (first use >> in this function) >> sg/syzkaller1.c:204: warning: implicit declaration of function >> ‘__atomic_fetch_sub’ >> sg/syzkaller1.c: In function ‘test’: >> sg/syzkaller1.c:406: error: ‘__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST’ undeclared (first use >> in this function) >> make[1]: *** [sg/syzkaller1] Error 1 >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/blktests/src' >> make: *** [all] Error 2 >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> It seems that __atomic_* functions are not available, and could you >> tell me how to fix >> the compiler error? > It seems like gcc 4.4 is too old to handle __ATOMIC_*. The oldest > version of gcc I tried was 4.8 which could handle this code perfectly > fine. > > I think we need hacks in the makefile to see which compiler version we > have and conditionally compile the code. Hi Johannes, Thanks for your quick reply. i will try to fix it as you suggested. Thanks, Xiao Yang > Byte, > Johannes > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/tests/generic/473 b/tests/generic/473 new file mode 100755 index 0000000..d7998cd --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/generic/473 @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +#! /bin/bash +# FS QA Test No. 473 +# +# Regression test for commit: +# 77032ca ("Return EBUSY from BLKRRPART for mounted whole-dev fs") +# +# If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and +# mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return +# EBUSY. On buggy kernel, it passes unexpectedly. +# +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- +# Copyright (c) 2017 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved. +# Author: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> +# +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as +# published by the Free Software Foundation. +# +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +# GNU General Public License for more details. +# +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- +# + +seq=`basename $0` +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq +echo "QA output created by $seq" + +here=`pwd` +tmpdir=`mktemp -d` +status=1 # failure is the default! +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 7 15 + +_cleanup() +{ + # Umount + $UMOUNT_PROG $tmpdir >>$seqres.full 2>&1 + # Destroy device + _put_scsi_debug_dev + rm -rf $tmpdir +} + +# get standard environment, filters and checks +. ./common/rc +. ./common/scsi_debug + +# remove previous $seqres.full before test +rm -f $seqres.full + +# real QA test starts here +_supported_os Linux +_require_scsi_debug + +# Create and format +test_dev=`_get_scsi_debug_dev` +_mkfs_dev $test_dev >>$seqres.full 2>&1 + +# Mount and check mounted whole-dev +_mount $test_dev $tmpdir + +out=$(blockdev --rereadpt $test_dev 2>&1) +res=$? + +echo $out | grep -q "Unknown command" && \ + _notrun "blockdev --rereadpt was not supported" + +[ $res -eq 0 ] && _fail "blockdev --rereadpt passed when checking mounted whole-dev" + +echo $out | grep -q "Device or resource busy" || \ + _fail "blockdev --rereadpt returned unexpected error when checking mounted whole-dev" + +echo $out >> $seqres.full + +echo "Silence is golden" + +# success, all done +status=0 +exit diff --git a/tests/generic/473.out b/tests/generic/473.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..854fbcd --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/generic/473.out @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +QA output created by 473 +Silence is golden diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group index 6c3bb03..54b9404 100644 --- a/tests/generic/group +++ b/tests/generic/group @@ -472,3 +472,4 @@ 467 auto quick exportfs 468 shutdown auto quick metadata 469 auto quick +473 auto quick blockdev
If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return EBUSY instead of pass. Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> --- tests/generic/473 | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/generic/473.out | 2 ++ tests/generic/group | 1 + 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100755 tests/generic/473 create mode 100644 tests/generic/473.out