From patchwork Sat Dec 2 05:33:39 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mikulas Patocka X-Patchwork-Id: 10088533 X-Patchwork-Delegate: snitzer@redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A500A60380 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 05:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A67D2A00B for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 05:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 7C4E32A00D; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 05:33:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51CA82A00B for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 05:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF2964A6E6; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 05:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2761F6BF89; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 05:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEDB1800BDC; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 05:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id vB25XhDZ028713 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 00:33:43 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 3705A5EDE4; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 05:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: dm-devel@redhat.com Received: from file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com (file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.5.7]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 898185D6A2; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 05:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id vB25Xd9V014315; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 00:33:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (mpatocka@localhost) by file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id vB25XdhY014311; Sat, 2 Dec 2017 00:33:39 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com: mpatocka owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 00:33:39 -0500 (EST) From: Mikulas Patocka X-X-Sender: mpatocka@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com To: Mike Snitzer Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-bufio: use REQ_OP_ macros X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Sat, 02 Dec 2017 05:33:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP We should use REQ_OP_READ and REQ_OP_WRITE macros instead of READ and WRITE. The have the same value, but the block layer uses REQ_OP, so we should use it too. Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka --- drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c +++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static void submit_io(struct dm_buffer * sector = (b->block << b->c->sectors_per_block_bits) + b->c->start; - if (rw != WRITE) { + if (rw != REQ_OP_WRITE) { n_sectors = 1 << b->c->sectors_per_block_bits; offset = 0; } else { @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static void __write_dirty_buffer(struct b->write_end = b->dirty_end; if (!write_list) - submit_io(b, WRITE, write_endio); + submit_io(b, REQ_OP_WRITE, write_endio); else list_add_tail(&b->write_list, write_list); } @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ static void __flush_write_list(struct li struct dm_buffer *b = list_entry(write_list->next, struct dm_buffer, write_list); list_del(&b->write_list); - submit_io(b, WRITE, write_endio); + submit_io(b, REQ_OP_WRITE, write_endio); cond_resched(); } blk_finish_plug(&plug); @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ static void *new_read(struct dm_bufio_cl return NULL; if (need_submit) - submit_io(b, READ, read_endio); + submit_io(b, REQ_OP_READ, read_endio); wait_on_bit_io(&b->state, B_READING, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); @@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ void dm_bufio_prefetch(struct dm_bufio_c dm_bufio_unlock(c); if (need_submit) - submit_io(b, READ, read_endio); + submit_io(b, REQ_OP_READ, read_endio); dm_bufio_release(b); cond_resched(); @@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ retry: old_block = b->block; __unlink_buffer(b); __link_buffer(b, new_block, b->list_mode); - submit_io(b, WRITE, write_endio); + submit_io(b, REQ_OP_WRITE, write_endio); wait_on_bit_io(&b->state, B_WRITING, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); __unlink_buffer(b);