@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ clocks {
reg-names = "control";
};
- clkusb1: clkusb1 {
+ clkusb1: clkusb1@2350004 {
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "ti,keystone,psc-clock";
clocks = <&chipclk16>;
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ clocks {
domain-id = <0>;
};
- clkhyperlink0: clkhyperlink0 {
+ clkhyperlink0: clkhyperlink02350030 {
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "ti,keystone,psc-clock";
clocks = <&chipclk12>;
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ clocks {
domain-id = <5>;
};
- clkpcie1: clkpcie1 {
+ clkpcie1: clkpcie1@235006c {
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "ti,keystone,psc-clock";
clocks = <&chipclk12>;
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ clocks {
domain-id = <18>;
};
- clkxge: clkxge {
+ clkxge: clkxge@23500c8 {
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "ti,keystone,psc-clock";
clocks = <&chipclk13>;
Add the control register as the base for the clock nodes which are missing them. This squashes the following warnings of the effect when built with W=1: arch/arm/boot/dts/keystone-k2e-evm.dtb: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc@0/clocks/clkusb1 has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name arch/arm/boot/dts/keystone-k2e-evm.dtb: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc@0/clocks/clkhyperlink0 has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name arch/arm/boot/dts/keystone-k2e-evm.dtb: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc@0/clocks/clkpcie1 has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name arch/arm/boot/dts/keystone-k2e-evm.dtb: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc@0/clocks/clkxge has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name Reported-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/keystone-k2e-clocks.dtsi | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)