@@ -363,13 +363,13 @@ i915_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
I915_SHRINK_BOUND |
I915_SHRINK_UNBOUND |
I915_SHRINK_PURGEABLE);
- if (freed < sc->nr_to_scan)
+ if (sc->nr_scanned < sc->nr_to_scan)
freed += i915_gem_shrink(i915,
sc->nr_to_scan - sc->nr_scanned,
&sc->nr_scanned,
I915_SHRINK_BOUND |
I915_SHRINK_UNBOUND);
- if (freed < sc->nr_to_scan && current_is_kswapd()) {
+ if (sc->nr_scanned < sc->nr_to_scan && current_is_kswapd()) {
intel_runtime_pm_get(i915);
freed += i915_gem_shrink(i915,
sc->nr_to_scan - sc->nr_scanned,
Since commit 4e773c3a8a69 ("drm/i915: Wire up shrinkctl->nr_scanned"), we track the number of objects we scan and do not wish to exceed that as it will overly penalise our own slabs under mempressure. Given that we now know the target number of objects to scan, use that as our guide for deciding to shrink as opposed to the number of objects we manage to shrink (which doesn't correspond to the numbers we report to shrinkctl). Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)