btrfs: fix bare unsigned declarations
diff mbox

Message ID
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Anand Jain Feb. 13, 2018, 9:50 a.m. UTC
Kernel style prefers "unsigned int <foo>" over "unsigned <foo>"
and "signed int <foo>" over "signed <foo>".

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <>
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


David Sterba Feb. 13, 2018, 4:58 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 05:50:48PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Kernel style prefers "unsigned int <foo>" over "unsigned <foo>"
> and "signed int <foo>" over "signed <foo>".

The changelog does not match the changes, you're switching to u32. I
agree u32 looks more suitable and consistent with the other changes.
Please update the changelog and fixup the temporary variable in
btrfs_remount. Thanks.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

diff mbox

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 80d1d4d12f9d..c6de1a5281ca 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -993,8 +993,8 @@  struct btrfs_fs_info {
 	struct btrfs_balance_control *balance_ctl;
 	wait_queue_head_t balance_wait_q;
-	unsigned data_chunk_allocations;
-	unsigned metadata_ratio;
+	u32 data_chunk_allocations;
+	u32 metadata_ratio;
 	void *bdev_holder;