[v6,13/15] xfs: communicate lock drop events from xfs_break_layouts()
diff mbox

Message ID 152112915950.24669.2377167541944853596.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Dan Williams March 15, 2018, 3:52 p.m. UTC
In preparation for adding a new layout type, teach xfs_break_layouts()
to return a positive number if it needed to drop locks while trying to
break leases. For all layouts to be successfully broken each layout type
needs to be able to assert that the layouts were broken with the locks
held.

The existing a xfs_break_layouts() is pushed down a level to
xfs_break_leased_layouts() and the new xfs_break_layouts() will
coordinate interpreting the return code from the low level 'break'
helpers.

Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c  |   17 +++++++++++++++++
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h |    2 ++
 fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c |    1 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c  |    1 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c  |   15 ++++++++-------
 fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.h  |    4 ++--
 6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Christoph Hellwig March 16, 2018, 7:08 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 08:52:39AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> In preparation for adding a new layout type, teach xfs_break_layouts()
> to return a positive number if it needed to drop locks while trying to
> break leases. For all layouts to be successfully broken each layout type
> needs to be able to assert that the layouts were broken with the locks
> held.
> 
> The existing a xfs_break_layouts() is pushed down a level to
> xfs_break_leased_layouts() and the new xfs_break_layouts() will
> coordinate interpreting the return code from the low level 'break'
> helpers.

With that the subject line is rather confusing, given that the
externally visible xfs_break_layouts does not communicate the lock
drop events.  So maybe this should just be titled something about
refactoring.  Or just merged into the next patch which reshuffles
everything again anyway.

>  int
> -xfs_break_layouts(
> +xfs_break_leased_layouts(
>  	struct inode		*inode,
>  	uint			*iolock)
>  {
>  	struct xfs_inode	*ip = XFS_I(inode);
>  	int			error;
> -
> -	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL
> -				| XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL));
> +	int			did_unlock = 0;
>  
>  	while ((error = break_layout(inode, false) == -EWOULDBLOCK)) {
>  		xfs_iunlock(ip, *iolock);
> +		did_unlock = 1;
>  		error = break_layout(inode, true);
>  		*iolock &= ~XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED;
>  		*iolock |= XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
>  		xfs_ilock(ip, *iolock);
>  	}
>  
> -	return error;
> +	if (error < 0)
> +		return error;
> +	return did_unlock;

And I suspect the cleaner interface would be to just pass a 
bool *did_unlock argument.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Patch
diff mbox

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index ba969019bf26..5742d395a4e4 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -759,6 +759,23 @@  xfs_file_write_iter(
 	return ret;
 }
 
+int
+xfs_break_layouts(
+	struct inode		*inode,
+	uint			*iolock)
+{
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip = XFS_I(inode);
+	int			ret;
+
+	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL
+				| XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL));
+
+	ret = xfs_break_leased_layouts(inode, iolock);
+	if (ret > 0)
+		ret = 0;
+	return ret;
+}
+
 #define	XFS_FALLOC_FL_SUPPORTED						\
 		(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE |		\
 		 FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE | FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE |	\
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
index 3e8dc990d41c..74c63f3a720f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
@@ -447,6 +447,8 @@  int	xfs_zero_eof(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_off_t offset,
 		     xfs_fsize_t isize, bool *did_zeroing);
 int	xfs_zero_range(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_off_t pos, xfs_off_t count,
 		bool *did_zero);
+int	xfs_break_layouts(struct inode *inode, uint *iolock);
+
 
 /* from xfs_iops.c */
 extern void xfs_setup_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
index 4151fade4bb1..d70a1919e787 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ 
 #include "xfs_icache.h"
 #include "xfs_symlink.h"
 #include "xfs_trans.h"
-#include "xfs_pnfs.h"
 #include "xfs_acl.h"
 #include "xfs_btree.h"
 #include <linux/fsmap.h>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
index d23aa08426f9..78eb56d447df 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ 
 #include "xfs_da_btree.h"
 #include "xfs_dir2.h"
 #include "xfs_trans_space.h"
-#include "xfs_pnfs.h"
 #include "xfs_iomap.h"
 
 #include <linux/capability.h>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
index 9fe661c2d59c..49784828929d 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
@@ -31,25 +31,26 @@ 
  * rules in the page fault path we don't bother.
  */
 int
-xfs_break_layouts(
+xfs_break_leased_layouts(
 	struct inode		*inode,
 	uint			*iolock)
 {
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip = XFS_I(inode);
 	int			error;
-
-	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL
-				| XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL));
+	int			did_unlock = 0;
 
 	while ((error = break_layout(inode, false) == -EWOULDBLOCK)) {
 		xfs_iunlock(ip, *iolock);
+		did_unlock = 1;
 		error = break_layout(inode, true);
 		*iolock &= ~XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED;
 		*iolock |= XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
 		xfs_ilock(ip, *iolock);
 	}
 
-	return error;
+	if (error < 0)
+		return error;
+	return did_unlock;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -122,8 +123,8 @@  xfs_fs_map_blocks(
 	 * Lock out any other I/O before we flush and invalidate the pagecache,
 	 * and then hand out a layout to the remote system.  This is very
 	 * similar to direct I/O, except that the synchronization is much more
-	 * complicated.  See the comment near xfs_break_layouts for a detailed
-	 * explanation.
+	 * complicated.  See the comment near xfs_break_leased_layouts
+	 * for a detailed explanation.
 	 */
 	xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
 
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.h
index bf45951e28fe..12f46fe6d902 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.h
@@ -9,10 +9,10 @@  int xfs_fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, u64 length,
 int xfs_fs_commit_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *maps, int nr_maps,
 		struct iattr *iattr);
 
-int xfs_break_layouts(struct inode *inode, uint *iolock);
+int xfs_break_leased_layouts(struct inode *inode, uint *iolock);
 #else
 static inline int
-xfs_break_layouts(struct inode *inode, uint *iolock)
+xfs_break_leased_layouts(struct inode *inode, uint *iolock)
 {
 	return 0;
 }