| Message ID | 20180412145757.4130-2-xose.vazquez@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Delegated to: | christophe varoqui |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 16:57 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > To indicate that the default licence is LGPL-2.0, > since there are still a lot of files without a licence header. > > Result: > multipath-tools/ > └── LICENSE.default -> LICENSES/LGPL-2.0 License.default is better than COPYING, which, as you said yourself, normally refers to a GPL-type license. But I'm unsure if this really clarifies matters. If adding my lenghty review document to the tree is out of the question, a note in the README might be more helpful than this link: License ======= The multipath-tools source code is covered by several different licenses. Refer to the individual source files for details. Source files which do not have a license header are shipped under LGPL-2.0 (see LICENSES/LGPL-2.0). Regards Martin
diff --git a/LICENSE.default b/LICENSE.default new file mode 120000 index 0000000..0c0462d --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE.default @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +LICENSES/LGPL-2.0 \ No newline at end of file
To indicate that the default licence is LGPL-2.0, since there are still a lot of files without a licence header. Result: multipath-tools/ └── LICENSE.default -> LICENSES/LGPL-2.0 Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Cc: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com> Cc: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> Cc: Gris Ge <fge@redhat.com> Cc: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com> Cc: DM ML <dm-devel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com> --- LICENSE.default | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 120000 LICENSE.default