diff mbox

[v5,20/28] fpga: dfl: add fpga bridge platform driver for FME

Message ID 1525229431-3087-21-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Wu, Hao May 2, 2018, 2:50 a.m. UTC
This patch adds fpga bridge platform driver for FPGA Management Engine.
It implements the enable_set callback for fpga bridge.

Signed-off-by: Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
---
v3: rename driver to fpga-dfl-fme-br
    remove useless dev_dbg in probe function.
    rebased due to fpga api change.
v4: rename to dfl-fme-br and fix SPDX license issue
    include dfl-fme-pr.h instead of dfl-fme.h
    add Acked-by from Alan and Moritz
v5: rebase due to API changes.
    defer port and its ops finding when really need.
---
 drivers/fpga/Kconfig      |   6 +++
 drivers/fpga/Makefile     |   1 +
 drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c

Comments

Alan Tull May 23, 2018, 3:15 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:

Hi Hao,

> This patch adds fpga bridge platform driver for FPGA Management Engine.
> It implements the enable_set callback for fpga bridge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
> ---
> v3: rename driver to fpga-dfl-fme-br
>     remove useless dev_dbg in probe function.
>     rebased due to fpga api change.
> v4: rename to dfl-fme-br and fix SPDX license issue
>     include dfl-fme-pr.h instead of dfl-fme.h
>     add Acked-by from Alan and Moritz
> v5: rebase due to API changes.
>     defer port and its ops finding when really need.
> ---
>  drivers/fpga/Kconfig      |   6 +++
>  drivers/fpga/Makefile     |   1 +
>  drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> index 89f76e8..a8f939a 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> @@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ config FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR
>         help
>           Say Y to enable FPGA Manager driver for FPGA Management Engine.
>
> +config FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE
> +       tristate "FPGA DFL FME Bridge Driver"
> +       depends on FPGA_DFL_FME
> +       help
> +         Say Y to enable FPGA Bridge driver for FPGA Management Engine.
> +
>  config FPGA_DFL_PCI
>         tristate "FPGA Device Feature List (DFL) PCIe Device Driver"
>         depends on PCI && FPGA_DFL
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> index f82814a..75096e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_FPGA_REGION)          += of-fpga-region.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL)                 += dfl.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME)             += dfl-fme.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR)         += dfl-fme-mgr.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE)      += dfl-fme-br.o
>
>  dfl-fme-objs := dfl-fme-main.o dfl-fme-pr.o
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5c51b08
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * FPGA Bridge Driver for FPGA Management Engine (FME)
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc.
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + *   Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> + *   Joseph Grecco <joe.grecco@intel.com>
> + *   Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> + *   Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
> + *   Ananda Ravuri <ananda.ravuri@intel.com>
> + *   Henry Mitchel <henry.mitchel@intel.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h>
> +
> +#include "dfl.h"
> +#include "dfl-fme-pr.h"
> +
> +struct fme_br_priv {
> +       struct dfl_fme_br_pdata *pdata;
> +       struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *port_ops;
> +       struct platform_device *port_pdev;
> +};
> +
> +static int fme_bridge_enable_set(struct fpga_bridge *bridge, bool enable)
> +{
> +       struct fme_br_priv *priv = bridge->priv;
> +       struct platform_device *port_pdev;
> +       struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *ops;
> +
> +       if (!priv->port_pdev) {
> +               port_pdev = dfl_fpga_cdev_find_port(priv->pdata->cdev,
> +                                                   &priv->pdata->port_id,
> +                                                   dfl_fpga_check_port_id);
> +               if (!port_pdev)
> +                       return -ENODEV;
> +
> +               priv->port_pdev = port_pdev;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (priv->port_pdev && !priv->port_ops) {
> +               ops = dfl_fpga_get_port_ops(priv->port_pdev);
> +               if (!ops || !ops->enable_set)
> +                       return -ENOENT;
> +
> +               priv->port_ops = ops;
> +       }

This is saving some pointers.  Is it possible that the port_pdev or
port_ops could go away?

Also, the port ops routines probably should be named
dfl_fpga_port_ops_get/find_port/etc

Alan

> +
> +       return priv->port_ops->enable_set(priv->port_pdev, enable);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct fpga_bridge_ops fme_bridge_ops = {
> +       .enable_set = fme_bridge_enable_set,
> +};
> +
> +static int fme_br_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +       struct fme_br_priv *priv;
> +       struct fpga_bridge *br;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!priv)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       priv->pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> +
> +       br = fpga_bridge_create(dev, "DFL FPGA FME Bridge",
> +                               &fme_bridge_ops, priv);
> +       if (!br)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, br);
> +
> +       ret = fpga_bridge_register(br);
> +       if (ret)
> +               fpga_bridge_free(br);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int fme_br_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       struct fpga_bridge *br = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +       struct fme_br_priv *priv = br->priv;
> +
> +       fpga_bridge_unregister(br);
> +
> +       if (priv->port_pdev)
> +               put_device(&priv->port_pdev->dev);
> +       if (priv->port_ops)
> +               dfl_fpga_put_port_ops(priv->port_ops);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver fme_br_driver = {
> +       .driver = {
> +               .name    = DFL_FPGA_FME_BRIDGE,
> +       },
> +       .probe   = fme_br_probe,
> +       .remove  = fme_br_remove,
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(fme_br_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("FPGA Bridge for DFL FPGA Management Engine");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:dfl-fme-bridge");
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Wu, Hao May 23, 2018, 3:28 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:15:00AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Hao,
> 
> > This patch adds fpga bridge platform driver for FPGA Management Engine.
> > It implements the enable_set callback for fpga bridge.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
> > Acked-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > v3: rename driver to fpga-dfl-fme-br
> >     remove useless dev_dbg in probe function.
> >     rebased due to fpga api change.
> > v4: rename to dfl-fme-br and fix SPDX license issue
> >     include dfl-fme-pr.h instead of dfl-fme.h
> >     add Acked-by from Alan and Moritz
> > v5: rebase due to API changes.
> >     defer port and its ops finding when really need.
> > ---
> >  drivers/fpga/Kconfig      |   6 +++
> >  drivers/fpga/Makefile     |   1 +
> >  drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> > index 89f76e8..a8f939a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> > @@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ config FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR
> >         help
> >           Say Y to enable FPGA Manager driver for FPGA Management Engine.
> >
> > +config FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE
> > +       tristate "FPGA DFL FME Bridge Driver"
> > +       depends on FPGA_DFL_FME
> > +       help
> > +         Say Y to enable FPGA Bridge driver for FPGA Management Engine.
> > +
> >  config FPGA_DFL_PCI
> >         tristate "FPGA Device Feature List (DFL) PCIe Device Driver"
> >         depends on PCI && FPGA_DFL
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> > index f82814a..75096e9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_FPGA_REGION)          += of-fpga-region.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL)                 += dfl.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME)             += dfl-fme.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR)         += dfl-fme-mgr.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE)      += dfl-fme-br.o
> >
> >  dfl-fme-objs := dfl-fme-main.o dfl-fme-pr.o
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..5c51b08
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * FPGA Bridge Driver for FPGA Management Engine (FME)
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Authors:
> > + *   Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> > + *   Joseph Grecco <joe.grecco@intel.com>
> > + *   Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> > + *   Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
> > + *   Ananda Ravuri <ananda.ravuri@intel.com>
> > + *   Henry Mitchel <henry.mitchel@intel.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h>
> > +
> > +#include "dfl.h"
> > +#include "dfl-fme-pr.h"
> > +
> > +struct fme_br_priv {
> > +       struct dfl_fme_br_pdata *pdata;
> > +       struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *port_ops;
> > +       struct platform_device *port_pdev;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int fme_bridge_enable_set(struct fpga_bridge *bridge, bool enable)
> > +{
> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv = bridge->priv;
> > +       struct platform_device *port_pdev;
> > +       struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *ops;
> > +
> > +       if (!priv->port_pdev) {
> > +               port_pdev = dfl_fpga_cdev_find_port(priv->pdata->cdev,
> > +                                                   &priv->pdata->port_id,
> > +                                                   dfl_fpga_check_port_id);
> > +               if (!port_pdev)
> > +                       return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +               priv->port_pdev = port_pdev;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       if (priv->port_pdev && !priv->port_ops) {
> > +               ops = dfl_fpga_get_port_ops(priv->port_pdev);
> > +               if (!ops || !ops->enable_set)
> > +                       return -ENOENT;
> > +
> > +               priv->port_ops = ops;
> > +       }
> 
> This is saving some pointers.  Is it possible that the port_pdev or
> port_ops could go away?

Hi Alan

Thanks for the comments.

The find_port function will get the port device to prevent that.
You can see put device in remove function. And it's similar for the
port ops. In dfl_fpga_get_port_ops function, it will prevent unexpected
port ops removing by try module get.

> 
> Also, the port ops routines probably should be named
> dfl_fpga_port_ops_get/find_port/etc
>

Hm.. as I see there are functions named as get_device(), put_device(), so
I just name it as ..._get_port_ops and ..._put_port_ops in similar way. :)
If you think that could be a better name, it's fine for me to change them.

Thanks
Hao
 
> Alan
> 
> > +
> > +       return priv->port_ops->enable_set(priv->port_pdev, enable);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct fpga_bridge_ops fme_bridge_ops = {
> > +       .enable_set = fme_bridge_enable_set,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int fme_br_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv;
> > +       struct fpga_bridge *br;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       if (!priv)
> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +       priv->pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> > +
> > +       br = fpga_bridge_create(dev, "DFL FPGA FME Bridge",
> > +                               &fme_bridge_ops, priv);
> > +       if (!br)
> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, br);
> > +
> > +       ret = fpga_bridge_register(br);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               fpga_bridge_free(br);
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int fme_br_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +       struct fpga_bridge *br = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv = br->priv;
> > +
> > +       fpga_bridge_unregister(br);
> > +
> > +       if (priv->port_pdev)
> > +               put_device(&priv->port_pdev->dev);
> > +       if (priv->port_ops)
> > +               dfl_fpga_put_port_ops(priv->port_ops);
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver fme_br_driver = {
> > +       .driver = {
> > +               .name    = DFL_FPGA_FME_BRIDGE,
> > +       },
> > +       .probe   = fme_br_probe,
> > +       .remove  = fme_br_remove,
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_platform_driver(fme_br_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("FPGA Bridge for DFL FPGA Management Engine");
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:dfl-fme-bridge");
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Alan Tull May 23, 2018, 9:06 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:15:00AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hao,
>>
>> > This patch adds fpga bridge platform driver for FPGA Management Engine.
>> > It implements the enable_set callback for fpga bridge.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@intel.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@intel.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
>> > Acked-by: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
>> > Acked-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
>> > ---
>> > v3: rename driver to fpga-dfl-fme-br
>> >     remove useless dev_dbg in probe function.
>> >     rebased due to fpga api change.
>> > v4: rename to dfl-fme-br and fix SPDX license issue
>> >     include dfl-fme-pr.h instead of dfl-fme.h
>> >     add Acked-by from Alan and Moritz
>> > v5: rebase due to API changes.
>> >     defer port and its ops finding when really need.
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/fpga/Kconfig      |   6 +++
>> >  drivers/fpga/Makefile     |   1 +
>> >  drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  3 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
>> >  create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
>> > index 89f76e8..a8f939a 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
>> > @@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ config FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR
>> >         help
>> >           Say Y to enable FPGA Manager driver for FPGA Management Engine.
>> >
>> > +config FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE
>> > +       tristate "FPGA DFL FME Bridge Driver"
>> > +       depends on FPGA_DFL_FME
>> > +       help
>> > +         Say Y to enable FPGA Bridge driver for FPGA Management Engine.
>> > +
>> >  config FPGA_DFL_PCI
>> >         tristate "FPGA Device Feature List (DFL) PCIe Device Driver"
>> >         depends on PCI && FPGA_DFL
>> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
>> > index f82814a..75096e9 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile
>> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
>> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_FPGA_REGION)          += of-fpga-region.o
>> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL)                 += dfl.o
>> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME)             += dfl-fme.o
>> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR)         += dfl-fme-mgr.o
>> > +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE)      += dfl-fme-br.o
>> >
>> >  dfl-fme-objs := dfl-fme-main.o dfl-fme-pr.o
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 0000000..5c51b08
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
>> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> > +/*
>> > + * FPGA Bridge Driver for FPGA Management Engine (FME)
>> > + *
>> > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc.
>> > + *
>> > + * Authors:
>> > + *   Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
>> > + *   Joseph Grecco <joe.grecco@intel.com>
>> > + *   Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
>> > + *   Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
>> > + *   Ananda Ravuri <ananda.ravuri@intel.com>
>> > + *   Henry Mitchel <henry.mitchel@intel.com>
>> > + */
>> > +
>> > +#include <linux/module.h>
>> > +#include <linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h>
>> > +
>> > +#include "dfl.h"
>> > +#include "dfl-fme-pr.h"
>> > +
>> > +struct fme_br_priv {
>> > +       struct dfl_fme_br_pdata *pdata;
>> > +       struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *port_ops;
>> > +       struct platform_device *port_pdev;
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +static int fme_bridge_enable_set(struct fpga_bridge *bridge, bool enable)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv = bridge->priv;
>> > +       struct platform_device *port_pdev;
>> > +       struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *ops;
>> > +
>> > +       if (!priv->port_pdev) {
>> > +               port_pdev = dfl_fpga_cdev_find_port(priv->pdata->cdev,
>> > +                                                   &priv->pdata->port_id,
>> > +                                                   dfl_fpga_check_port_id);
>> > +               if (!port_pdev)
>> > +                       return -ENODEV;
>> > +
>> > +               priv->port_pdev = port_pdev;
>> > +       }
>> > +
>> > +       if (priv->port_pdev && !priv->port_ops) {
>> > +               ops = dfl_fpga_get_port_ops(priv->port_pdev);
>> > +               if (!ops || !ops->enable_set)
>> > +                       return -ENOENT;
>> > +
>> > +               priv->port_ops = ops;
>> > +       }
>>
>> This is saving some pointers.  Is it possible that the port_pdev or
>> port_ops could go away?
>
> Hi Alan
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> The find_port function will get the port device to prevent that.
> You can see put device in remove function. And it's similar for the
> port ops. In dfl_fpga_get_port_ops function, it will prevent unexpected
> port ops removing by try module get.

OK, good, and I see the find_port function documents that put_device
is needed, so that's good too.

When we previously discussed this [1] you described a procedure of
hot-unplugging the VF AFU from the VM and turning it back to PF before
doing the FPGA programming.   Some comments on that would be helpful,
maybe located with the port_ops functions.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/6/180

>
>>
>> Also, the port ops routines probably should be named
>> dfl_fpga_port_ops_get/find_port/etc
>>
>
> Hm.. as I see there are functions named as get_device(), put_device(), so
> I just name it as ..._get_port_ops and ..._put_port_ops in similar way. :)
> If you think that could be a better name, it's fine for me to change them.

Yes, I've seen that too.  I think keeping the prefix the same helps to
organize the namespace.  Plus :) if I'm grepping through the code, I
can be lazy and not have to use a regex to find the port ops
functions.

Alan

>
> Thanks
> Hao
>
>> Alan
>>
>> > +
>> > +       return priv->port_ops->enable_set(priv->port_pdev, enable);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static const struct fpga_bridge_ops fme_bridge_ops = {
>> > +       .enable_set = fme_bridge_enable_set,
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +static int fme_br_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv;
>> > +       struct fpga_bridge *br;
>> > +       int ret;
>> > +
>> > +       priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>> > +       if (!priv)
>> > +               return -ENOMEM;
>> > +
>> > +       priv->pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
>> > +
>> > +       br = fpga_bridge_create(dev, "DFL FPGA FME Bridge",
>> > +                               &fme_bridge_ops, priv);
>> > +       if (!br)
>> > +               return -ENOMEM;
>> > +
>> > +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, br);
>> > +
>> > +       ret = fpga_bridge_register(br);
>> > +       if (ret)
>> > +               fpga_bridge_free(br);
>> > +
>> > +       return ret;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int fme_br_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct fpga_bridge *br = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv = br->priv;
>> > +
>> > +       fpga_bridge_unregister(br);
>> > +
>> > +       if (priv->port_pdev)
>> > +               put_device(&priv->port_pdev->dev);
>> > +       if (priv->port_ops)
>> > +               dfl_fpga_put_port_ops(priv->port_ops);
>> > +
>> > +       return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static struct platform_driver fme_br_driver = {
>> > +       .driver = {
>> > +               .name    = DFL_FPGA_FME_BRIDGE,
>> > +       },
>> > +       .probe   = fme_br_probe,
>> > +       .remove  = fme_br_remove,
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +module_platform_driver(fme_br_driver);
>> > +
>> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("FPGA Bridge for DFL FPGA Management Engine");
>> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
>> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:dfl-fme-bridge");
>> > --
>> > 1.8.3.1
>> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Wu, Hao May 23, 2018, 11:42 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:06:17PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:15:00AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Hao,
> >>
> >> > This patch adds fpga bridge platform driver for FPGA Management Engine.
> >> > It implements the enable_set callback for fpga bridge.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@intel.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@intel.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> >> > Acked-by: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
> >> > Acked-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
> >> > ---
> >> > v3: rename driver to fpga-dfl-fme-br
> >> >     remove useless dev_dbg in probe function.
> >> >     rebased due to fpga api change.
> >> > v4: rename to dfl-fme-br and fix SPDX license issue
> >> >     include dfl-fme-pr.h instead of dfl-fme.h
> >> >     add Acked-by from Alan and Moritz
> >> > v5: rebase due to API changes.
> >> >     defer port and its ops finding when really need.
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/fpga/Kconfig      |   6 +++
> >> >  drivers/fpga/Makefile     |   1 +
> >> >  drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >  3 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
> >> >  create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> >> > index 89f76e8..a8f939a 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> >> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> >> > @@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ config FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR
> >> >         help
> >> >           Say Y to enable FPGA Manager driver for FPGA Management Engine.
> >> >
> >> > +config FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE
> >> > +       tristate "FPGA DFL FME Bridge Driver"
> >> > +       depends on FPGA_DFL_FME
> >> > +       help
> >> > +         Say Y to enable FPGA Bridge driver for FPGA Management Engine.
> >> > +
> >> >  config FPGA_DFL_PCI
> >> >         tristate "FPGA Device Feature List (DFL) PCIe Device Driver"
> >> >         depends on PCI && FPGA_DFL
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> >> > index f82814a..75096e9 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> >> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> >> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_FPGA_REGION)          += of-fpga-region.o
> >> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL)                 += dfl.o
> >> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME)             += dfl-fme.o
> >> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR)         += dfl-fme-mgr.o
> >> > +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE)      += dfl-fme-br.o
> >> >
> >> >  dfl-fme-objs := dfl-fme-main.o dfl-fme-pr.o
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> > index 0000000..5c51b08
> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
> >> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> > +/*
> >> > + * FPGA Bridge Driver for FPGA Management Engine (FME)
> >> > + *
> >> > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc.
> >> > + *
> >> > + * Authors:
> >> > + *   Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> >> > + *   Joseph Grecco <joe.grecco@intel.com>
> >> > + *   Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> >> > + *   Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
> >> > + *   Ananda Ravuri <ananda.ravuri@intel.com>
> >> > + *   Henry Mitchel <henry.mitchel@intel.com>
> >> > + */
> >> > +
> >> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> > +#include <linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h>
> >> > +
> >> > +#include "dfl.h"
> >> > +#include "dfl-fme-pr.h"
> >> > +
> >> > +struct fme_br_priv {
> >> > +       struct dfl_fme_br_pdata *pdata;
> >> > +       struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *port_ops;
> >> > +       struct platform_device *port_pdev;
> >> > +};
> >> > +
> >> > +static int fme_bridge_enable_set(struct fpga_bridge *bridge, bool enable)
> >> > +{
> >> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv = bridge->priv;
> >> > +       struct platform_device *port_pdev;
> >> > +       struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *ops;
> >> > +
> >> > +       if (!priv->port_pdev) {
> >> > +               port_pdev = dfl_fpga_cdev_find_port(priv->pdata->cdev,
> >> > +                                                   &priv->pdata->port_id,
> >> > +                                                   dfl_fpga_check_port_id);
> >> > +               if (!port_pdev)
> >> > +                       return -ENODEV;
> >> > +
> >> > +               priv->port_pdev = port_pdev;
> >> > +       }
> >> > +
> >> > +       if (priv->port_pdev && !priv->port_ops) {
> >> > +               ops = dfl_fpga_get_port_ops(priv->port_pdev);
> >> > +               if (!ops || !ops->enable_set)
> >> > +                       return -ENOENT;
> >> > +
> >> > +               priv->port_ops = ops;
> >> > +       }
> >>
> >> This is saving some pointers.  Is it possible that the port_pdev or
> >> port_ops could go away?
> >
> > Hi Alan
> >
> > Thanks for the comments.
> >
> > The find_port function will get the port device to prevent that.
> > You can see put device in remove function. And it's similar for the
> > port ops. In dfl_fpga_get_port_ops function, it will prevent unexpected
> > port ops removing by try module get.
> 
> OK, good, and I see the find_port function documents that put_device
> is needed, so that's good too.
> 
> When we previously discussed this [1] you described a procedure of
> hot-unplugging the VF AFU from the VM and turning it back to PF before
> doing the FPGA programming.   Some comments on that would be helpful,
> maybe located with the port_ops functions.
> 

Hi Alan

Actually I plan to add those descriptions about virtualization in the
documenation/fpga/dfl.txt, together with the patch which enables the
virtualization support for Intel FPGA device (e.g Intel PAC card). I
think dfl.txt is a better place to have that procedure documented.
How do you think?


> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/6/180
> 
> >
> >>
> >> Also, the port ops routines probably should be named
> >> dfl_fpga_port_ops_get/find_port/etc
> >>
> >
> > Hm.. as I see there are functions named as get_device(), put_device(), so
> > I just name it as ..._get_port_ops and ..._put_port_ops in similar way. :)
> > If you think that could be a better name, it's fine for me to change them.
> 
> Yes, I've seen that too.  I think keeping the prefix the same helps to
> organize the namespace.  Plus :) if I'm grepping through the code, I
> can be lazy and not have to use a regex to find the port ops
> functions.

so we good with current naming?

some places we find it's get_device() and put_device(), but other functions
like device_add(), device_del(). actually it's not a big problem I think, :)
currently port_ops has a unified style ..._add/del/get/put_port_ops. I am
fine with both kind of naming, if you prefer ...port_ops_add/del/get/put
style, please let me know, I can change them in the next version.

Thanks
Hao

> 
> Alan
> 
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hao
> >
> >> Alan
> >>
> >> > +
> >> > +       return priv->port_ops->enable_set(priv->port_pdev, enable);
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static const struct fpga_bridge_ops fme_bridge_ops = {
> >> > +       .enable_set = fme_bridge_enable_set,
> >> > +};
> >> > +
> >> > +static int fme_br_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> > +{
> >> > +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv;
> >> > +       struct fpga_bridge *br;
> >> > +       int ret;
> >> > +
> >> > +       priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > +       if (!priv)
> >> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> >> > +
> >> > +       priv->pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> >> > +
> >> > +       br = fpga_bridge_create(dev, "DFL FPGA FME Bridge",
> >> > +                               &fme_bridge_ops, priv);
> >> > +       if (!br)
> >> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> >> > +
> >> > +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, br);
> >> > +
> >> > +       ret = fpga_bridge_register(br);
> >> > +       if (ret)
> >> > +               fpga_bridge_free(br);
> >> > +
> >> > +       return ret;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static int fme_br_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> > +{
> >> > +       struct fpga_bridge *br = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv = br->priv;
> >> > +
> >> > +       fpga_bridge_unregister(br);
> >> > +
> >> > +       if (priv->port_pdev)
> >> > +               put_device(&priv->port_pdev->dev);
> >> > +       if (priv->port_ops)
> >> > +               dfl_fpga_put_port_ops(priv->port_ops);
> >> > +
> >> > +       return 0;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static struct platform_driver fme_br_driver = {
> >> > +       .driver = {
> >> > +               .name    = DFL_FPGA_FME_BRIDGE,
> >> > +       },
> >> > +       .probe   = fme_br_probe,
> >> > +       .remove  = fme_br_remove,
> >> > +};
> >> > +
> >> > +module_platform_driver(fme_br_driver);
> >> > +
> >> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("FPGA Bridge for DFL FPGA Management Engine");
> >> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
> >> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> >> > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:dfl-fme-bridge");
> >> > --
> >> > 1.8.3.1
> >> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Alan Tull May 24, 2018, 5:26 p.m. UTC | #5
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:42 PM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:06:17PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:15:00AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>> >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Hao,
>> >>
>> >> > This patch adds fpga bridge platform driver for FPGA Management Engine.
>> >> > It implements the enable_set callback for fpga bridge.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@intel.com>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@intel.com>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
>> >> > Acked-by: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
>> >> > Acked-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
>> >> > ---
>> >> > v3: rename driver to fpga-dfl-fme-br
>> >> >     remove useless dev_dbg in probe function.
>> >> >     rebased due to fpga api change.
>> >> > v4: rename to dfl-fme-br and fix SPDX license issue
>> >> >     include dfl-fme-pr.h instead of dfl-fme.h
>> >> >     add Acked-by from Alan and Moritz
>> >> > v5: rebase due to API changes.
>> >> >     defer port and its ops finding when really need.
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  drivers/fpga/Kconfig      |   6 +++
>> >> >  drivers/fpga/Makefile     |   1 +
>> >> >  drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> >  3 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
>> >> >  create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
>> >> > index 89f76e8..a8f939a 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
>> >> > @@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ config FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR
>> >> >         help
>> >> >           Say Y to enable FPGA Manager driver for FPGA Management Engine.
>> >> >
>> >> > +config FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE
>> >> > +       tristate "FPGA DFL FME Bridge Driver"
>> >> > +       depends on FPGA_DFL_FME
>> >> > +       help
>> >> > +         Say Y to enable FPGA Bridge driver for FPGA Management Engine.
>> >> > +
>> >> >  config FPGA_DFL_PCI
>> >> >         tristate "FPGA Device Feature List (DFL) PCIe Device Driver"
>> >> >         depends on PCI && FPGA_DFL
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
>> >> > index f82814a..75096e9 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
>> >> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_FPGA_REGION)          += of-fpga-region.o
>> >> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL)                 += dfl.o
>> >> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME)             += dfl-fme.o
>> >> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR)         += dfl-fme-mgr.o
>> >> > +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE)      += dfl-fme-br.o
>> >> >
>> >> >  dfl-fme-objs := dfl-fme-main.o dfl-fme-pr.o
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
>> >> > new file mode 100644
>> >> > index 0000000..5c51b08
>> >> > --- /dev/null
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
>> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
>> >> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> >> > +/*
>> >> > + * FPGA Bridge Driver for FPGA Management Engine (FME)
>> >> > + *
>> >> > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc.
>> >> > + *
>> >> > + * Authors:
>> >> > + *   Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
>> >> > + *   Joseph Grecco <joe.grecco@intel.com>
>> >> > + *   Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
>> >> > + *   Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
>> >> > + *   Ananda Ravuri <ananda.ravuri@intel.com>
>> >> > + *   Henry Mitchel <henry.mitchel@intel.com>
>> >> > + */
>> >> > +
>> >> > +#include <linux/module.h>
>> >> > +#include <linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h>
>> >> > +
>> >> > +#include "dfl.h"
>> >> > +#include "dfl-fme-pr.h"
>> >> > +
>> >> > +struct fme_br_priv {
>> >> > +       struct dfl_fme_br_pdata *pdata;
>> >> > +       struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *port_ops;
>> >> > +       struct platform_device *port_pdev;
>> >> > +};
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static int fme_bridge_enable_set(struct fpga_bridge *bridge, bool enable)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv = bridge->priv;
>> >> > +       struct platform_device *port_pdev;
>> >> > +       struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *ops;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       if (!priv->port_pdev) {
>> >> > +               port_pdev = dfl_fpga_cdev_find_port(priv->pdata->cdev,
>> >> > +                                                   &priv->pdata->port_id,
>> >> > +                                                   dfl_fpga_check_port_id);
>> >> > +               if (!port_pdev)
>> >> > +                       return -ENODEV;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +               priv->port_pdev = port_pdev;
>> >> > +       }
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       if (priv->port_pdev && !priv->port_ops) {
>> >> > +               ops = dfl_fpga_get_port_ops(priv->port_pdev);
>> >> > +               if (!ops || !ops->enable_set)
>> >> > +                       return -ENOENT;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +               priv->port_ops = ops;
>> >> > +       }
>> >>
>> >> This is saving some pointers.  Is it possible that the port_pdev or
>> >> port_ops could go away?
>> >
>> > Hi Alan
>> >
>> > Thanks for the comments.
>> >
>> > The find_port function will get the port device to prevent that.
>> > You can see put device in remove function. And it's similar for the
>> > port ops. In dfl_fpga_get_port_ops function, it will prevent unexpected
>> > port ops removing by try module get.
>>
>> OK, good, and I see the find_port function documents that put_device
>> is needed, so that's good too.
>>
>> When we previously discussed this [1] you described a procedure of
>> hot-unplugging the VF AFU from the VM and turning it back to PF before
>> doing the FPGA programming.   Some comments on that would be helpful,
>> maybe located with the port_ops functions.
>>
>
> Hi Alan
>
> Actually I plan to add those descriptions about virtualization in the
> documenation/fpga/dfl.txt, together with the patch which enables the
> virtualization support for Intel FPGA device (e.g Intel PAC card).

Great

> I
> think dfl.txt is a better place to have that procedure documented.
> How do you think?

If it is only in the dff.txt, it may remain unclear (in the code) that
that is an issue that the code is working around.

>
>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/6/180
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Also, the port ops routines probably should be named
>> >> dfl_fpga_port_ops_get/find_port/etc
>> >>
>> >
>> > Hm.. as I see there are functions named as get_device(), put_device(), so
>> > I just name it as ..._get_port_ops and ..._put_port_ops in similar way. :)
>> > If you think that could be a better name, it's fine for me to change them.
>>
>> Yes, I've seen that too.  I think keeping the prefix the same helps to
>> organize the namespace.  Plus :) if I'm grepping through the code, I
>> can be lazy and not have to use a regex to find the port ops
>> functions.
>
> so we good with current naming?

Recently GregKH give us some guidance about using a common prefix [2].

>
> some places we find it's get_device() and put_device(), but other functions
> like device_add(), device_del(). actually it's not a big problem I think, :)
> currently port_ops has a unified style ..._add/del/get/put_port_ops. I am
> fine with both kind of naming, if you prefer ...port_ops_add/del/get/put
> style, please let me know, I can change them in the next version.

Since you have struct dfl_fpga_port_ops, you can just add _{action} to
the name of the struct and you have dfl_fpga_port_ops_add/del/get/pu

Thanks,
Alan

[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/15/709

>
> Thanks
> Hao
>
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Hao
>> >
>> >> Alan
>> >>
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       return priv->port_ops->enable_set(priv->port_pdev, enable);
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static const struct fpga_bridge_ops fme_bridge_ops = {
>> >> > +       .enable_set = fme_bridge_enable_set,
>> >> > +};
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static int fme_br_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> >> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv;
>> >> > +       struct fpga_bridge *br;
>> >> > +       int ret;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> > +       if (!priv)
>> >> > +               return -ENOMEM;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       priv->pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       br = fpga_bridge_create(dev, "DFL FPGA FME Bridge",
>> >> > +                               &fme_bridge_ops, priv);
>> >> > +       if (!br)
>> >> > +               return -ENOMEM;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, br);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       ret = fpga_bridge_register(br);
>> >> > +       if (ret)
>> >> > +               fpga_bridge_free(br);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       return ret;
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static int fme_br_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +       struct fpga_bridge *br = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> >> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv = br->priv;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       fpga_bridge_unregister(br);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       if (priv->port_pdev)
>> >> > +               put_device(&priv->port_pdev->dev);
>> >> > +       if (priv->port_ops)
>> >> > +               dfl_fpga_put_port_ops(priv->port_ops);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +       return 0;
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static struct platform_driver fme_br_driver = {
>> >> > +       .driver = {
>> >> > +               .name    = DFL_FPGA_FME_BRIDGE,
>> >> > +       },
>> >> > +       .probe   = fme_br_probe,
>> >> > +       .remove  = fme_br_remove,
>> >> > +};
>> >> > +
>> >> > +module_platform_driver(fme_br_driver);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("FPGA Bridge for DFL FPGA Management Engine");
>> >> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
>> >> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> >> > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:dfl-fme-bridge");
>> >> > --
>> >> > 1.8.3.1
>> >> >
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Wu, Hao May 24, 2018, 11:59 p.m. UTC | #6
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:26:09PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:42 PM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:06:17PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:15:00AM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Hao,
> >> >>
> >> >> > This patch adds fpga bridge platform driver for FPGA Management Engine.
> >> >> > It implements the enable_set callback for fpga bridge.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@intel.com>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@intel.com>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> >> >> > Acked-by: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
> >> >> > Acked-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
> >> >> > ---
> >> >> > v3: rename driver to fpga-dfl-fme-br
> >> >> >     remove useless dev_dbg in probe function.
> >> >> >     rebased due to fpga api change.
> >> >> > v4: rename to dfl-fme-br and fix SPDX license issue
> >> >> >     include dfl-fme-pr.h instead of dfl-fme.h
> >> >> >     add Acked-by from Alan and Moritz
> >> >> > v5: rebase due to API changes.
> >> >> >     defer port and its ops finding when really need.
> >> >> > ---
> >> >> >  drivers/fpga/Kconfig      |   6 +++
> >> >> >  drivers/fpga/Makefile     |   1 +
> >> >> >  drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >> >  3 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
> >> >> >  create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
> >> >> >
> >> >> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> >> >> > index 89f76e8..a8f939a 100644
> >> >> > --- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> >> >> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> >> >> > @@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ config FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR
> >> >> >         help
> >> >> >           Say Y to enable FPGA Manager driver for FPGA Management Engine.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +config FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE
> >> >> > +       tristate "FPGA DFL FME Bridge Driver"
> >> >> > +       depends on FPGA_DFL_FME
> >> >> > +       help
> >> >> > +         Say Y to enable FPGA Bridge driver for FPGA Management Engine.
> >> >> > +
> >> >> >  config FPGA_DFL_PCI
> >> >> >         tristate "FPGA Device Feature List (DFL) PCIe Device Driver"
> >> >> >         depends on PCI && FPGA_DFL
> >> >> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> >> >> > index f82814a..75096e9 100644
> >> >> > --- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> >> >> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> >> >> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_FPGA_REGION)          += of-fpga-region.o
> >> >> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL)                 += dfl.o
> >> >> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME)             += dfl-fme.o
> >> >> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR)         += dfl-fme-mgr.o
> >> >> > +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE)      += dfl-fme-br.o
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  dfl-fme-objs := dfl-fme-main.o dfl-fme-pr.o
> >> >> >
> >> >> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
> >> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> >> > index 0000000..5c51b08
> >> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> >> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
> >> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
> >> >> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> >> > +/*
> >> >> > + * FPGA Bridge Driver for FPGA Management Engine (FME)
> >> >> > + *
> >> >> > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc.
> >> >> > + *
> >> >> > + * Authors:
> >> >> > + *   Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> >> >> > + *   Joseph Grecco <joe.grecco@intel.com>
> >> >> > + *   Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> >> >> > + *   Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
> >> >> > + *   Ananda Ravuri <ananda.ravuri@intel.com>
> >> >> > + *   Henry Mitchel <henry.mitchel@intel.com>
> >> >> > + */
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> >> > +#include <linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h>
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +#include "dfl.h"
> >> >> > +#include "dfl-fme-pr.h"
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +struct fme_br_priv {
> >> >> > +       struct dfl_fme_br_pdata *pdata;
> >> >> > +       struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *port_ops;
> >> >> > +       struct platform_device *port_pdev;
> >> >> > +};
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +static int fme_bridge_enable_set(struct fpga_bridge *bridge, bool enable)
> >> >> > +{
> >> >> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv = bridge->priv;
> >> >> > +       struct platform_device *port_pdev;
> >> >> > +       struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *ops;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       if (!priv->port_pdev) {
> >> >> > +               port_pdev = dfl_fpga_cdev_find_port(priv->pdata->cdev,
> >> >> > +                                                   &priv->pdata->port_id,
> >> >> > +                                                   dfl_fpga_check_port_id);
> >> >> > +               if (!port_pdev)
> >> >> > +                       return -ENODEV;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +               priv->port_pdev = port_pdev;
> >> >> > +       }
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       if (priv->port_pdev && !priv->port_ops) {
> >> >> > +               ops = dfl_fpga_get_port_ops(priv->port_pdev);
> >> >> > +               if (!ops || !ops->enable_set)
> >> >> > +                       return -ENOENT;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +               priv->port_ops = ops;
> >> >> > +       }
> >> >>
> >> >> This is saving some pointers.  Is it possible that the port_pdev or
> >> >> port_ops could go away?
> >> >
> >> > Hi Alan
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the comments.
> >> >
> >> > The find_port function will get the port device to prevent that.
> >> > You can see put device in remove function. And it's similar for the
> >> > port ops. In dfl_fpga_get_port_ops function, it will prevent unexpected
> >> > port ops removing by try module get.
> >>
> >> OK, good, and I see the find_port function documents that put_device
> >> is needed, so that's good too.
> >>
> >> When we previously discussed this [1] you described a procedure of
> >> hot-unplugging the VF AFU from the VM and turning it back to PF before
> >> doing the FPGA programming.   Some comments on that would be helpful,
> >> maybe located with the port_ops functions.
> >>
> >
> > Hi Alan
> >
> > Actually I plan to add those descriptions about virtualization in the
> > documenation/fpga/dfl.txt, together with the patch which enables the
> > virtualization support for Intel FPGA device (e.g Intel PAC card).
> 
> Great
> 
> > I
> > think dfl.txt is a better place to have that procedure documented.
> > How do you think?
> 
> If it is only in the dff.txt, it may remain unclear (in the code) that
> that is an issue that the code is working around.

No problem, I will add more comments in the code too.

> 
> >
> >
> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/6/180
> >>
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Also, the port ops routines probably should be named
> >> >> dfl_fpga_port_ops_get/find_port/etc
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Hm.. as I see there are functions named as get_device(), put_device(), so
> >> > I just name it as ..._get_port_ops and ..._put_port_ops in similar way. :)
> >> > If you think that could be a better name, it's fine for me to change them.
> >>
> >> Yes, I've seen that too.  I think keeping the prefix the same helps to
> >> organize the namespace.  Plus :) if I'm grepping through the code, I
> >> can be lazy and not have to use a regex to find the port ops
> >> functions.
> >
> > so we good with current naming?
> 
> Recently GregKH give us some guidance about using a common prefix [2].

I see, Thanks.

> 
> >
> > some places we find it's get_device() and put_device(), but other functions
> > like device_add(), device_del(). actually it's not a big problem I think, :)
> > currently port_ops has a unified style ..._add/del/get/put_port_ops. I am
> > fine with both kind of naming, if you prefer ...port_ops_add/del/get/put
> > style, please let me know, I can change them in the next version.
> 
> Since you have struct dfl_fpga_port_ops, you can just add _{action} to
> the name of the struct and you have dfl_fpga_port_ops_add/del/get/pu

Sure, I will change them in the next version.

Hao

> 
> Thanks,
> Alan
> 
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/15/709
> 
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hao
> >
> >>
> >> Alan
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Hao
> >> >
> >> >> Alan
> >> >>
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       return priv->port_ops->enable_set(priv->port_pdev, enable);
> >> >> > +}
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +static const struct fpga_bridge_ops fme_bridge_ops = {
> >> >> > +       .enable_set = fme_bridge_enable_set,
> >> >> > +};
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +static int fme_br_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> >> > +{
> >> >> > +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> >> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv;
> >> >> > +       struct fpga_bridge *br;
> >> >> > +       int ret;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> >> > +       if (!priv)
> >> >> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       priv->pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       br = fpga_bridge_create(dev, "DFL FPGA FME Bridge",
> >> >> > +                               &fme_bridge_ops, priv);
> >> >> > +       if (!br)
> >> >> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, br);
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       ret = fpga_bridge_register(br);
> >> >> > +       if (ret)
> >> >> > +               fpga_bridge_free(br);
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       return ret;
> >> >> > +}
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +static int fme_br_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> >> > +{
> >> >> > +       struct fpga_bridge *br = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> >> > +       struct fme_br_priv *priv = br->priv;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       fpga_bridge_unregister(br);
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       if (priv->port_pdev)
> >> >> > +               put_device(&priv->port_pdev->dev);
> >> >> > +       if (priv->port_ops)
> >> >> > +               dfl_fpga_put_port_ops(priv->port_ops);
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       return 0;
> >> >> > +}
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +static struct platform_driver fme_br_driver = {
> >> >> > +       .driver = {
> >> >> > +               .name    = DFL_FPGA_FME_BRIDGE,
> >> >> > +       },
> >> >> > +       .probe   = fme_br_probe,
> >> >> > +       .remove  = fme_br_remove,
> >> >> > +};
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +module_platform_driver(fme_br_driver);
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("FPGA Bridge for DFL FPGA Management Engine");
> >> >> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
> >> >> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> >> >> > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:dfl-fme-bridge");
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > 1.8.3.1
> >> >> >
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
index 89f76e8..a8f939a 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
@@ -156,6 +156,12 @@  config FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR
 	help
 	  Say Y to enable FPGA Manager driver for FPGA Management Engine.
 
+config FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE
+	tristate "FPGA DFL FME Bridge Driver"
+	depends on FPGA_DFL_FME
+	help
+	  Say Y to enable FPGA Bridge driver for FPGA Management Engine.
+
 config FPGA_DFL_PCI
 	tristate "FPGA Device Feature List (DFL) PCIe Device Driver"
 	depends on PCI && FPGA_DFL
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
index f82814a..75096e9 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@  obj-$(CONFIG_OF_FPGA_REGION)		+= of-fpga-region.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL)			+= dfl.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME)		+= dfl-fme.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_MGR)		+= dfl-fme-mgr.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_DFL_FME_BRIDGE)	+= dfl-fme-br.o
 
 dfl-fme-objs := dfl-fme-main.o dfl-fme-pr.o
 
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5c51b08
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-br.c
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * FPGA Bridge Driver for FPGA Management Engine (FME)
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc.
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ *   Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
+ *   Joseph Grecco <joe.grecco@intel.com>
+ *   Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
+ *   Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
+ *   Ananda Ravuri <ananda.ravuri@intel.com>
+ *   Henry Mitchel <henry.mitchel@intel.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h>
+
+#include "dfl.h"
+#include "dfl-fme-pr.h"
+
+struct fme_br_priv {
+	struct dfl_fme_br_pdata *pdata;
+	struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *port_ops;
+	struct platform_device *port_pdev;
+};
+
+static int fme_bridge_enable_set(struct fpga_bridge *bridge, bool enable)
+{
+	struct fme_br_priv *priv = bridge->priv;
+	struct platform_device *port_pdev;
+	struct dfl_fpga_port_ops *ops;
+
+	if (!priv->port_pdev) {
+		port_pdev = dfl_fpga_cdev_find_port(priv->pdata->cdev,
+						    &priv->pdata->port_id,
+						    dfl_fpga_check_port_id);
+		if (!port_pdev)
+			return -ENODEV;
+
+		priv->port_pdev = port_pdev;
+	}
+
+	if (priv->port_pdev && !priv->port_ops) {
+		ops = dfl_fpga_get_port_ops(priv->port_pdev);
+		if (!ops || !ops->enable_set)
+			return -ENOENT;
+
+		priv->port_ops = ops;
+	}
+
+	return priv->port_ops->enable_set(priv->port_pdev, enable);
+}
+
+static const struct fpga_bridge_ops fme_bridge_ops = {
+	.enable_set = fme_bridge_enable_set,
+};
+
+static int fme_br_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct fme_br_priv *priv;
+	struct fpga_bridge *br;
+	int ret;
+
+	priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!priv)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	priv->pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
+
+	br = fpga_bridge_create(dev, "DFL FPGA FME Bridge",
+				&fme_bridge_ops, priv);
+	if (!br)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, br);
+
+	ret = fpga_bridge_register(br);
+	if (ret)
+		fpga_bridge_free(br);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int fme_br_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct fpga_bridge *br = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct fme_br_priv *priv = br->priv;
+
+	fpga_bridge_unregister(br);
+
+	if (priv->port_pdev)
+		put_device(&priv->port_pdev->dev);
+	if (priv->port_ops)
+		dfl_fpga_put_port_ops(priv->port_ops);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver fme_br_driver = {
+	.driver	= {
+		.name    = DFL_FPGA_FME_BRIDGE,
+	},
+	.probe   = fme_br_probe,
+	.remove  = fme_br_remove,
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(fme_br_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("FPGA Bridge for DFL FPGA Management Engine");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+MODULE_ALIAS("platform:dfl-fme-bridge");